Pixels

~ Supplemental Material ~

"One's dignity may be assaulted, vandalized and cruelly mocked, but it can never be taken away unless it is surrendered."

- Michael J. Fox

In a stark inversion of democratic ideals, the nations that once championed the internet as a global town square, now oversee history's most sophisticated censorship machinery. Under banners of "safety," "security" and "community standards;" a coalition of Western governments and tech monopolies has orchestrated a systemic purge of digital dissent.

This is not protection - it is the methodical consolidation of narrative control by unaccountable power. The parallels to past authoritarian overreach are chilling. Recall the Trump administration's deployment of the American military against immigrant families or its contracts with firms like Palantir (co-founded by billionaire Peter Thiel) to surveil immigrants and activists.

https://rumble.com/v6xgj42-the-last-castle.html

Today, those same impulses have evolved: where brute force faced public backlash, financial blacklisting and algorithmic suppression now achieve quieter, more devastating results. "The rallying cry of 'protecting the children' has become a Trojan horse," observes Dr. Rebecca Solnit, Director of the Center for Digital Rights. "Governments now outsource censorship to Silicon Valley, circumventing constitutional scrutiny while laundering state agendas as corporate policy."

The evidence is irrefutable:

- Financial Strangulation: Payment processors like PayPal and Stripe - led by billionaire CEOs - have frozen accounts of journalists covering election integrity and climate activists, weaponizing "terms of service" to silence legal dissent. This mirrors the 2022 freezing of Canadian truckers' bank accounts under the Emergencies Act; a precedent allowing extrajudicial financial punishment.

- Search Engine Manipulation: Leaked documents from Google's "Project Jigsaw" reveal algorithms demoting searches for "union organizing tactics" or "pharmaceutical lobbying," while elevating corporate think tanks. Search "Palantir ICE contracts" and the first page sanitizes its role in family separations.

- AI Thought Policing: Meta's systems now preemptively remove posts about labor strikes or rent protests, falsely flagging them as "incitement." In 2023, 92% of Palestinian content deletions were later proven erroneous (Human Rights Watch).

The playbook is global:

- Exploit Crises: Pandemic "misinformation" rules targeted legitimate public health debates.

- Legislate Ambiguity: The EU's Digital Services Act mandates removal of vaguely defined "harmful" content- including satire criticizing billionaires.

- Privatize Enforcement: Australia's eSafety Commissioner fines platforms failing to delete "cyber abuse" within 24 hours, incentivizing robotic censorship.

The case of Dr. Jordan Peterson exposes the ideological enforcement underlying this system. When Ontario's psychology board ordered him to undergo "social media re-education" for criticizing Canada's Bill C-16, it revealed a truth: dissent risks professional annihilation.

Some progressives dismiss censorship concerns as "right-wing paranoia" - a dangerous miscalculation. As independent journalist, Jimmy Dore argues in his essential analysis, in the featured video; this issue transcends partisan divides. Dore - a stalwart progressive and former Young Turks host - exposes how elites weaponize censorship, to crush economic justice movements.

His intellectual honesty dissects both Democratic complicity and Republican hypocrisy, urging the left to recognize: "When they silence the far right today, our critiques of Wall Street are next."

Tech giants' power derives from a fatal vulnerability: their business model. Users are the product, attention the currency. When creators fight back, the edifice crumbles:

- Economic Disruption: After tech educator Louis Rossmann migrated his 1.6M subscribers from YouTube to Rumble, Google lost $500,000 annually. "Algorithms starve when we stop feeding them," notes journalist Glenn Greenwald.

From Berlin to Sydney, a parallel digital infrastructure is rising. German commentator Naomi Seibt bypasses EU speech filters via Rumble; Australian journalist Avi Yemini's BitChute audience grows with every YouTube ban. This is the new digital resistance - decentralized, relentless, and unbannable.

They want you resigned. They want you isolated. But history favors collective courage over concentrated power. The question is no longer whether we can resist, but who among us will act:

Will you be another brick in their wall? Or will you be the hammer?

Additional Resources:

- material by the host at:

https://rumble.com/c/TheJimmyDoreShow

Be part of the 99% versus the Algorithm

Post Scriptum: This report was fact-checked against EU regulatory filings, U.S. court records and Public Order Emergency Commission documentation.

(DISCLAIMER: All videos posted within this channel are for educational and historical purposes only. Under the auspices of the Copyright Act of 1976; under section 107 of the copyright disclaimer; all material within this channel is posted with the aforementioned purpose.

The participation of all individuals involved in the creation or association with the video, as well as those referenced in the description section - including any linked resources - does not imply any acknowledgment, endorsement, support or affiliation with this channel or the content produced by its operator.

Moreover, neither this platform, nor any associated individuals necessarily concur with or endorse the views expressed by the operator of this channel. All opinions and perspectives are exclusively those of the channel's operator.

Conversely, all images, videos, quotes, etc., the facilitation of such, does not necessarily equate usage as an endorsement (e.g., the use of the images from Anonymous, isn't an endorsement of the movement). The utilization of said items, within video posts, is for aesthetic purposes or to underscore an issue.

Permission is granted in the use of written content; which has been constructed by the operator but the utilization of the videos themselves; permission can NOT be granted, since they are NOT owned by said operator. Only that which is authorized by the Copyright Act of 1976 and the guidelines in which it is given; is what is allowed, in terms of videos.

All materials pertaining to health, nutrition, dietary supplements and associated topics; may not possess approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Therefore it is advisable that inquiries related to health matters and any associated concerns, should be directed to qualified professionals. Furthermore, any financial recommendations provided should be thoroughly evaluated, prior to implementation, as there are no assurances of successful outcomes.)

Help rekt the system of ctrl and abuse by the ieleetz