BJ'S SIDE OF TIKTOK

1 month ago
36

Two sleep-deprived gremlins tried to learn TikTok Live and accidentally hosted a carnival. We juggled rogue mods, cursed filters, and a corgi-based economy; got yeeted for an age-violation mid-bit; summoned 100k+ taps with ~30 people; battled for digital roses, dolphins, and a “naughty chicken”; argued pizza theology; quoted the Joker like it was scripture; and crawled to 1,000 followers while swatting Bible-username trolls. Attorneys were mentioned. Ring lights were begged for. Someone became a honey bee and threatened to “clap them yams.” Internet, you’re ridiculous—and we love you for it.

Highlights (aka the wreckage):
Filter roulette: cowboy - ghost - jaundiced zombie - Pixar child - moon goblin - honey bee menace
Mod saga: “mod me”—wrong account—“mod me again”—now everyone’s a sheriff
TikTok Battles: money guns flying, corgi inflation rampant, and a last-second overtime snipe
100K likes with 30 viewers because apparently thumbs have CrossFit memberships
Age-gate KO: live ends, bouncer TikTok asks for ID, we appeal, we cackle
Boundaries & haters: respect the couple, or catch the block—no refunds
Screen-share prophecy: next time we bring receipts, cases, geopolitics, and actual visuals
White-sauce pizza VS red sauce; we don’t make the rules
Final boss: hitting 1K… then watching gremlins unsub out of spite… then hitting it again
Watch it, laugh at it, argue with it—just don’t be weird in DMs.
Subscribe, tap like until your phone begs for mercy, and catch the next live where we finally screen-share and behave even worse (but prettier, with a ring light).
TIMESTAMPS:
3:034:09 — Kiwi Farms anxiety: viewer says they’re not listed; hosts treat KF as a real danger. This becomes a running theme.
10:4513:13 — “Christian channel” vs chat snark about cleavage; they defend boundaries but also personalize conflict (“Bible girl”).
29:0031:16 — Harassment escalations: doxxing/CPS/fraud reports; lawyers retained. Heavy real-life claims dropped mid-Live.
53:0755:17 — Label policing: “girlfriend” vs “child’s mother”; they reassert 14-year partnership + 2 kids.
1:11:041:15:23 — Kiwi Farms redux: mixes legitimate concern with inaccurate “dark web/FBI” conflation; names an owner “Joshua.”
1:15:501:16:04 — Religious frame: “No weapon formed against us…” (persecution arc).
1:39:261:40:07 — Craig accidentally ends his stream; re-invites. Tech competence remains shaky.
1:58:032:00:17 — Craig taken down for age-requirement; told to appeal/ID-verify and set 18+.
2:01:072:05:06 — Cross-streaming risk talk (YouTube monetized; won’t dual-cast).
2:47:092:47:55 — Critique of “blocking too many”; Britney defends “drain the swamp” moderation strategy.
2:48:23 — Sign-off with one last dig at a negative commenter.
“Cheesy / Cheesy Wheezy” — 3:034:09, 1:11:061:11:25
Brought KF reassurance (“you’re not on Kiwi Farms”), later identified as tied to “Queen Bee’s people.”
“Bible girl” — 10:4516:07, ~14:0514:36
Became the center of a modesty/“Christian channel” argument; hosts call out the insult (“paper bag over her head”).
“Georgia dog” — 13:2214:11, 18:4118:49
Called out for past YouTube comments; bit of back-and-forth.
“Lisa” — 40:0451:10 and then repeatedly (e.g., 44:4645:05; 50:5151:10)
Keeps asking to be unblocked; Britney declines and explains why.
“Justice for Alyssa,”
Queen Bee (“QB”) — 1:17:271:17:44
Viewers suggest going on her panel; Britney says she’ll try to talk privately.
Kiwi Farms (site + owner first name “Joshua”) — 3:034:09; 1:11:041:15:23; 1:14:311:14:37
A persistent topic: safety concerns, whether they’re listed, how the site operates.

📌 ALL CLIPS OBTAINED AND USED UNDER FAIR USE:
The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act states:

“Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106a, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.”

This video, and my YouTube channel in general, may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for one or more of the reasons noted above.

Loading comments...