John Wanoa is Not A Scammer - Fact!

Making Sense of It All – My Conversation with Den Tarragon on John Wanoa
Last night, I found myself in a detailed discussion with Den Tarragon regarding his persistent claims that John Wanoa is a scammer. Den presented three pieces of “evidence” to back his assertions, and I responded point-by-point.
1. The London Court Paperwork Incident
Den’s first example centred on an incident in which John Wanoa and supporters, including Lee Cant, attempted to lodge paperwork at a court in England against the Queen and her judicial system.
According to Den, the court clerk refused to take possession of John’s paperwork (which I view as his affidavit or witness statement) and instead gave him only a slip – the meaning of which is unclear. He claims this slip proves that no official case was lodged. Den says John, Lee, and others portrayed this as a victory, misleading people into thinking the case was officially in the system when it wasn’t.
I disagreed with Den’s interpretation, pointing out that this event is a red herring and irrelevant to whether John Wanoa or the King’s Flag movement is a scam. The individuals involved believed the event was a success, and I see no deliberate deception. Different people can witness the same event and interpret it differently based on their own perspectives and biases.
Den has promised to post footage of the incident so that others can make up their own minds.
2. The Share Certificate from Jason Law
Den’s second piece of evidence is a receipt or certificate from someone named Jason Law, relating to a share sale in John Wanoa’s venture. He argues that if shares were sold without being legally issued, that would be fraudulent.
I agreed in principle – if John was taking money for shares that didn’t legally exist, that would be wrong. However, I emphasised that I wanted to see the document before making any judgment. It may well have been a “placeholder” – an acknowledgement of payment with the promise of a genuine share certificate once shares were formally available.
From my own experience, I once sent £25 to John Wanoa for a share, only to have it returned because no shares were ready to be issued.
I also explained that an unrelated administrative error sabotaged progress. When Lee Cant registered me as a director of Moai Power House, my name was misspelt at Companies House (“Mathew” instead of “Matthew”). Barclays refused to open a business bank account because the name on Companies House didn’t match my passport. Before I could correct this, I was arrested on unrelated allegations and had my computer equipment seized. This prevented me from updating company records and ultimately led to the company lapsing – a failure I take responsibility for, though I believe online detractors, including Tarragon, exploited the situation.
Den also alleged that 36 bank accounts were connected to John Wanoa – a claim I strongly dispute. Den agreed to publish the Jason Law document for public review.

3. Alleged Plan to Have Veterans Storm Parliament
Den’s final example was an extraordinary claim – that John Wanoa and the King’s Flag movement were attempting to incite 4.3 million veterans to storm parliament, each being a potential target to pay £25 for a share.
I find this claim ridiculous.
Neither John Wanoa nor anyone connected to him ever tried to get veterans to take such action. In fact, I personally attended the Veterans’ Weekend in June 2019 in London to speak directly to veteran leaders Dean Cumberpatch and Simon Bean – to assure them that John Wanoa is not a scammer, contrary to what they were being told by Den Tarragon, Nathan Kirkden, Gary Clarke, Danny Jones, AJ Lashbrook, and others.

My Conclusion
Den Tarragon’s three examples fail to prove that John Wanoa or the King’s Flag movement is a scam:
Court Paperwork: At worst, open to interpretation. Not evidence of a scam.

Share Certificate: Needs inspection before judgment. From my own dealings, I was refunded when shares weren’t ready.

Storming Parliament Claim: Baseless and exaggerated.

We’ve agreed to move forward by reviewing the documents and footage Den says he will publish, so others can make their own assessments.
If Den truly provides the evidence he claims, we can all look at it and judge for ourselves. Until then, I maintain that John Wanoa is not a scammer, and much of the rhetoric against him is exaggerated or outright false.