3RD SNL

Here for the chaos? Same. This backup-channel late-night special has everything: buffering apologies, a molar mutiny, AI grandmas on a rollercoaster, and a whiplash sprint from “like and subscribe” to missing-person updates. Empathy meets entropy, and the algorithm wants a snack.
TIMESTAMPS:
17:52 — “Hater channels” + view predictions
Notable positioning/claims about the channel’s trajectory (“end of 2025… 4K/5K views”) and tone toward critics.
1:15:24–1:16:58 — “Rings on it / we’re married?” banter
Personal reveal/branding moment that fans will clip; not investigatively important, but high engagement.
17:52 — “Hater channels” + view predictions
Notable positioning/claims about the channel’s trajectory (“end of 2025… 4K/5K views”) and tone toward critics.
Drama timestamps
17:52 – “Hater channels are falling apart … end of 2025 … 4K/5K views.” (direct shots at rivals)

20:29 – Bans a user; “quality over quantity.”

1:09:03–1:09:41 – Trolls “spelling out really bad stuff,” considers members-only.

1:07:29–1:08:10 – “Mallorie”/creator beef and makeup digs (then says they won’t engage).

1:14:02–1:14:43 – “They’re trying to discourage people from supporting me… we’re not going to be shut down.” (sustained feud narrative)

Possible Terms-of-Service risks (flag to review/mute)
Copyright / unlicensed media

46:48–49:00 – Plays a local TV news package on air. Fair use if heavily transformative, but this often gets claims.

31:27–33:10 (+ scattered [Music] cues) – AI “grannies ride” clip with music; unknown rights → claim risk.

Health/medical claims & potentially harmful advice

26:07–26:34 – Says metal fillings are “extremely toxic/mercury-filled” and that excess mercury “goes into the ocean” and can “kill 80,000 fish.” That’s questionable medical/environmental info; low–moderate policy risk but credibility hit.

1:02:34–1:03:02 – Chat suggests crushing ibuprofen into a cavity; host entertains it. That’s potentially harmful self-treatment (chemical burn risk). Safer to discourage.

Harassment / violence language (from chat, read aloud)

~1:04:29–1:04:35 – “More than half of them need to be beat with a [bible/babble].” Advocates violence toward unnamed people; should be moderated or disavowed to stay safe.

Misinfo/accuracy nits
59:11 – Mentions “October 7” during an August timeline—likely a slip. Not a violation, but worth correcting.
What’s inside:

Roll-call hellos, troll smackdowns, and the eternal “smash that like” chant
True-crime coverage: Gio’s case notes and the ongoing search for 10-year-old Jaden Spicer (with reminders to stick to verified info, not Facebook fever dreams)

Platform scheming: the “30 minutes on TikTok, two more times” ritual to unlock features

Relationship soft-launch: rings flashed, price tags dropped, credit scores humbled
Ground rules (because the internet needs them):

Tips go to official authorities, not my DMs. Rumors are not homework.

Don’t harass, dox, or dogpile anyone mentioned. Families are living this, not streaming it.

#truecrimecommunity #livestreamfail #missingpersons

📌 FULL LIVE HERE - https://www.youtube.com/live/O2I_qGHdENE?si=tApv4h-PGS_dZxFd

📌 ALL CLIPS OBTAINED AND USED UNDER FAIR USE:
The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act states:

“Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106a, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.”

This video, and my YouTube channel in general, may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for one or more of the reasons noted above.