Natural Updates: “CommieFornia” Mag Ban—Is Duncan v. Bonta Overturned?

📄 Description
Is California finally losing the fight over its magazine ban? The en banc Ninth Circuit just ruled in Duncan v. Bonta, upholding the state’s prohibition on large-capacity magazines—a major setback for Second Amendment advocates. But this isn’t the end: the California Rifle & Pistol Association has now petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court, hoping to reverse the decision.
Join Natural Law Attorney Michael Ehline as he breaks down:

What the Ninth Circuit's en banc ruling means for gun rights
How their legal reasoning clashes with Supreme Court precedent (Bruen)
Whether Duncan v. Bonta can be overturned or reshaped
The future of man-on-the-street firearms rights and how patriots can prepare

#Hashtags
#NaturalAttorneyUpdates #DuncanvBonta #MagazineBan #SecondAmendment #GunRights #AttorneyReact #Bruen #CaliforniaGunLaw #SCOTUSpetition #CommieFornia
Legal Breakdown Highlights:
In March 2025, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, sitting en banc, delivered a 7-4 decision upholding the constitutionality of California’s large-capacity magazine ban, calling magazines “accessories” not covered under the Second Amendment
Wikipedia
Crawford Defense Lawyer
.
The court dismissed the plaintiffs’ Fifth Amendment takings claim, saying the state’s forfeiture of property didn’t amount to unconstitutional taking
NRA-ILA
Everytown Law
.
Dissenting judges, including Bumatay and VanDyke, strongly argued that large-capacity magazines are protected “arms” under Bruen’s historical-textual standard and should be considered presumptively protected
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
Wikipedia
.
The California Rifle & Pistol Association filed a petition for Supreme Court review, urging SCOTUS to resolve the conflict between the Ninth Circuit’s decision and existing Second Amendment precedent
CRPA