Premium Only Content

Misrepresentation Claim Requires Production of Representation
Not Wise to Attempt Rescission Without Evidence
Post 5173
Desiree Durga and Justin Durga v. Memberselect Insurance Company, No. 371891, Court of Appeals of Michigan (August 13, 2025)Â Desiree Durga and Justin Durga (plaintiffs) claimed the insurer wrongfully attempted to rescind an auto policy.
THE ALLEGATIONS
The plaintiffs alleged that the defendant breached their automobile insurance contract by rescinding their policy based on an allegation of fraudulent misrepresentation in the application process. Â The rescission was attempted because plaintiff Justin Durga had two or more substance abuse convictions in seven years, his Michigan operator's license was mandatorily revoked from June 9, 2007 "until requirements have been met."
While defendant MemberSelect claimed that Desiree Durga's application for insurance contained a material misrepresentation, it did not produce a copy of the June 2012 application. In fact defendant admitted the application for insurance no longer exists.
Trial Court Decision
The trial court granted the plaintiffs' motion for summary disposition on their breach of contract claim and denied the defendant's cross-motion for summary disposition, which argued that it was entitled to rescind the policy. The court found that the defendant failed to provide clear and convincing evidence of fraud and that the plaintiffs had disclosed that Justin Durga did not have a valid driver's license. The court also noted that the defendant's reliance on underwriting guidelines that were not made available to the plaintiffs was not sufficient to support their claim .
The court ultimately affirmed the trial court's decision, granting judgment in favor of the plaintiffs in the amount of $82,476.04.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Insurance policies are contracts and, in the absence of an applicable statute, are subject to the same contract construction principles that apply to any other species of contract. An insurance policy must be enforced in accordance with its terms, which are given their commonly used meaning if not defined in the policy
Seeking Policy Rescission Based Upon Alleged Fraud In The Application Or Procurement Process
MemberSelect asserted the common law defense of fraudulent misrepresentation in plaintiff's application for or procurement of the subject automobile insurance policy allowed it rescission of the policy ab initio in order to avoid its contractual obligations to pay on plaintiffs' claim.
Because a claim to rescind a transaction is equitable in nature, it is not strictly a matter of right but is granted only in the sound discretion of the court.
The insurer, as the party asserting entitlement to the defense of fraudulent misrepresentation, bears the burden of proving the elements of rescission. At best, the question seeking license status of a proposed insured was ambiguous, such that it is construed against the drafter in favor of coverage. As a result the representation made by the plaintiffs did not constitute a false representation for purposes of establishing that prima facie element of a fraud in the application rescission claim.
DEFENDANT IS NOT ENTITLED TO RESCISSION
When people seek to procure insurance by making a clear material misrepresentation to the insurance company, thereby entitling the insurance carrier to rescind the subject policies of insurance, the insurer must produce admissible evidence of the misrepresentation. Not only has defendant not provided clear and convincing evidence of fraud in this case defendant provided no evidence of fraud. Therefore, it was not entitled to rescission.
ZALMA OPINION
Rescission is an equitable remedy that seeks to deal fairly with both parties to the insurance contract. The insurer claimed that the Durgas lied on the application which they could not produce because it did not exist. An insurer seeking rescission must do so fairly and in good faith with clear and unambiguous evidence of the misrepresentation. The insurer failed when it was unable to produce the allegedly false application.
(c) 2025 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.
Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos.
Subscribe to my substack at https://barryzalma.substack.com/subscribe
Go to X @bzalma; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/account/content?type=all; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg; Go to the Insurance Claims Library – https://lnkd.in/gwEYk.
-
8:20
Insurance Law
5 days agoInsurer Liable but Only for $1 Damages
281 -
LIVE
TimcastIRL
2 hours agoVP Says No Unity With Democrats Celebrating Charlie Kirk Assassination, Left Confirmed | Timcast IRL
33,346 watching -
13:45
The Charlie Kirk Show
1 hour agoTPUSA AT ASU CANDLELIGHT VIGIL
132K27 -
55:10
Katie Miller Pod
1 hour ago $2.46 earnedEpisode 6 - Attorney General Pam Bondi | The Katie Miller Podcast
12.9K3 -
UPCOMING
Man in America
6 hours agoLIVE: Assassin Story DOESN'T ADD UP! What Are They HIDING From Us?? | LET'S TALK
4.92K -
LIVE
Barry Cunningham
2 hours agoFOR PRESIDENT TRUMP WILL TAKE NO PRISONERS AND THE LIBS SHOULD EXPECT NO MERCY!
6,325 watching -
LIVE
Savanah Hernandez
2 hours agoCharlie Kirk Was Our Bridge And The Left Burned It
366 watching -
LIVE
Flyover Conservatives
5 hours agoFinancial Web Behind Charlie Kirk's Murder with Mel K | Silver On It's Way to $50 | FOC Show
1,167 watching -
LIVE
We Like Shooting
13 hours agoWe Like Shooting 628 (Gun Podcast)
149 watching -
1:09:26
Glenn Greenwald
4 hours agoTrump's Shifting Immigration and H-1B Policies: With Journalist Lee Fang and Political Science Professor Ron Hira | SYSTEM UPDATE #515
130K18