( -0952 ) Fauci Doubling Down on Hydroxychloroquine - What Happened to the Officials Who Viewed Anthony Weiner's Laptop "Kill Switch" - Redpilled Vaxx Prescriber Cries in Shame - & More

( -0952 ) Fauci Doubling Down on Hydroxychloroquine, What Happened to Weiner Laptop Viewing Officials, Redpilled Vaccine Jab Prescriber & More

(I didn't add the background music to the videos in this compilation and can only speculate that it was added to avoid copyright complaints.)

Transcription:

When he would say things that had nothing to do with my lane, which was health,
I would just sort of stand up there and, you know, if you want to start, you know,
disrespecting reporters and telling them that the anime that people will, that's
fine. That's not anything that I have to do with.
What should say in my precious, my love?
It's me, I'm losing his nerve.
No, not, never.
Smeagol hates nasty illnesses.
Smeagol wants to see him dead.
And we will.
Smeagol did it once. He can do it again.
But when he started to say things that were scientifically untrue, and from a public health
service, from a public health standpoint, was untrue, I really felt that I had to,
when asked, I wasn't proactively trying to disrespect him or hurt him because I do
have, even to this day, a very strong respect for the office of presidency in the
United States, and it was very uncomfortable for me when he would say something like it
would disappear like magic, or when it didn't disappear like magic, there would be the
invoking of magical elixirs like hydroxychloroquine because somebody told him that hydroxychloroquine
didn't work.
So when the press asked me, as painful as it was, I had to say, no, that's not true.
Hydroxychloroquine doesn't work, and in fact, it can harm you, and no, it's not going to
disappear like magic, so you've got to be careful and wear a mask.
So you think the point of arresting Diddy was to shut down inquiry into what Diddy was
doing?
Get the data, right?
I think they did it to get all the data away from Diddy because he was being sued in civil
court, and so they arrest Diddy.
What did they just convict him of?
Nothing.
Well, that's clearly the point of the first Jeffrey Epstein arrest.
Weiner's laptop had kill switches in it.
It was filled with crap that wasn't supposed to be there.
We never get to see it.
Supposedly nine cops watched the videos on Weiner's laptop.
They had to keep leaving the room because they couldn't stand what they were seeing,
and all nine are now dead.
And there's names and faces and deadness, right?
They're real people.
Now you can say, well, maybe they died for other reasons.
I go, but it's still nine cops.
It's like the five cops who died after January 6th, right?
Four of them were suicides.
According to AI, there were about 80 cops really in the thick of things.
Four of them died from suicide.
Do we have deep state actors that are trying to influence our presidential elections?
Is that what we're concluding here?
Yes, we have people within the intelligence community.
Again, when you look at this example of who President Obama charged with this task,
John Brennan, James Clapper, James Comey at the highest levels,
but also those who worked as careerists within the intelligence community
who did not object to their manipulation and manufacturing of intelligence
and actually helped them get there, all moving towards their partisan interests.
They were not happy with the outcome this election,
and they were willing to do whatever it took in order to try to undermine
President Trump's administration during his first term in office.
These are bad actors that have to be rooted out.
Our national security depends on it.
The ability for the American people's trust to be earned back
depends on exposing the bad actors and holding them accountable,
and that's what President Trump is determined to do.
So when you see this ALC count on anybody,
whether it's a seemingly healthy individual or someone you know has cancer,
you could see a number, and I'm sure there's just a range,
and if you fall below the acceptable range, you're at risk,
and that would be a potential candidate for this biostrike.
Incredibly correct.
In a sense that the range is if you go below 1,000,
so the normal range is between 1,000 to 4,000,
if you go below the 1,000, the statistical analysis
that's been shown now remarkably in about 200 to 300 publications
is that you have a statistical analysis opportunity
to actually have a shortened lifespan.
So this lower ALC, or if you drop below 1,000,
the medical term for that is lymphopenia.
So if you were to Google "lymphopenia," remarkably you'd see papers going,
all the way to 1990s, that if you have lymphopenia for breast cancer,
lymphopenia for pancreas cancer, lymphopenia for lung cancer,
any cancers you want to choose,
your survival rate is significantly and statistically shortened.
And that makes so much sense because what ALC is actually
is your lymphocytes and your T cells.
And the lymphocytes and T cells are only cells that really matter
to prevent infection, to prevent cancer, to treat the cancer,
to prevent metastasis.
So it is so obvious from my perspective, it's simple and yet profound,
that we've unlocked a paradigm change where we treat the host,
i.e. the immune system, rather than the disease.
In fact, the disease of cancer is really the symptom.
The root cause of the disease is the collapse of the immune system.
When I was going through the confirmation process,
this video comes out, it was done through Project Veritas,
but it was of a Biden EPA employee who was talking about how the agency
was tossing gold bars off the Titanic,
rushing to get billions of dollars out the door before Inauguration Day.
He was also talking about the desire to get themselves jobs
at the recipient NGOs.
And these members of the Senate, it was coming from Senate Republicans
who were saying, asking, demanding, if confirmed,
would you please make it a top priority to quickly get to the bottom of it?
Absolutely was my response with great enthusiasm and eagerness.
And our team quickly was able to trace down,
so basically every time we overturned a rock, we found something under it
that was either filled with self-dealing and conflicts of interest,
unqualified recipients or reduced agency oversight.
And when Democrats had one party rule in Washington, D.C.,
they passed this bill called the Inflation Reduction Act
that had tens of billions of dollars to go out through EPA.
Well, EPA didn't know how to spend tens of billions of dollars,
so they decided to park $20 billion at an outside bank
and to have that bank send the money through eight pass-through entities.
All these NGOs, pass-through entities that were riddled with
self-dealing and conflicts of interest, former Obama and Biden officials,
Democratic donors, as you pointed out.
And the EPA was a party to the account control agreement
with those prime recipients.
But here's the thing, when the money goes through the prime recipients
to others, in many cases, also pass-throughs,
EPA no longer is a party to the account control agreement.
EPA is a losing oversight.
By design, intentionally, these grant agreements,
these arrangements were set up to tie EPA's hands behind its back.
I could sit here with you, you could ask me 10, 15, 20
of the first most important questions that come to mind
as far as where the money was going after it leaves the pass-through entities.
And the crazy thing is how little I would be able to answer,
even today, this far after Inauguration Day, that is by design.
The DOJ has been investigating, the Inspector General's office
has been investigating, I terminated all of it.
Is there any way of getting the money back?
Absolutely. This has been going through a litigation process.
It's at an appeals court right now in the federal court system.
And we are basically at the end of a closeout period now,
because when these grants get terminated, there's a 120-day closeout period.
And this money should be recovered for the American public.
And I'm proud to be able to do my part with this great team here
to figure out, one, where the money went.
They tossed the gold bars off the Titanic.
I was told to go out and find the gold bars.
We found the gold bars and we're bringing them back on board.
And we're doing that for the American public and we're proud of it.
So these are my big issues regarding vaccines.
And these are the things that I'd like to highlight.
Number one, there is no education in medical schools that I am aware of.
And being an educator at the Cleveland Clinic Learner College of Medicine
and Case Western Reserve University, I am not aware of education around vaccines,
their contents, safety records, informed consent,
or the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.
We do not discuss that in 1986, Congress enacted legislation
removing all liability from pharma related to vaccine adverse events.
What are we taught about vaccines?
We are taught to memorize the vaccine schedule.
And actually, I'm going to be sitting for my family medicine boards this year,
and I am sure that I will have to memorize that schedule again in order to pass that exam.
We don't discuss that almost $4 billion with a B
has been paid to vaccine injured patients since 1992.
For medical professionals, we expect fair balance,
but vaccines seem to be absolved from that consideration.
Number two, there appears to be a conflict of interest
regarding payments to providers for completing vaccine schedules.
And a corollary to that, which would be number three,
patients are being dismissed from practices because of "vaccine safety concerns."
If you bring up a question about a vaccine and you decide not to vaccinate your child,
you may be at risk of being terminated from that practice.
Absolutely deplorable and disgusting.
Number four, and again to the Bailey family, I'm really sorry,
but employers are forcing employees to receive the flu vaccine
or face corrective action or job loss.
The fact that your dad was six months from retiring is...
Number five, there's a lack of informed consent,
and I was one of those providers who didn't provide safety sheets before vaccinating.
I would tell the parents, "These are the vaccines today.
We're going to give you three vaccines in one leg and two in the other.
And then after vaccinating either the child or the adult patient,
here's your information sheet."
And again, to be completely transparent with you,
I had no idea that there was even a mention of the compensation program
or a telephone number to call.
Absolutely deplorable on my part, and I apologize to my patients.
Number six, there's a lack of transparency regarding vaccine complications.
And worse, you're being shamed as patients
for suggesting that you were harmed by a vaccine.
If I see a patient in the office and diagnose strep throat
and give them penicillin, and either the mom or the patient themselves
calls and tells me that they developed a rash, there is zero question.
The chart now states they have an allergy to penicillin
and will never be given it again.
Why don't we believe parents and patients when they tell us
they have had an adverse event regarding a vaccine?
It doesn't make sense to me as a medical professional.
I apologize for being emotional.
So we're not pointing all the fingers at the Democratic Party,
but in the end, if we don't tell the story, let's tell the story to the American people
and give them a clear, clear depiction of what's transpiring before our very eyes.
And when I see a flagrant intent not to do that,
just because you want to get at Trump, listen,
I don't hesitate to criticize the president when I feel he deserves it.
Donald Trump, as far as I'm concerned, has had a few occasions
where he deserves criticism.
But on this particular situation, he's done more than we've seen
any Democrat in office try to do when it comes to Russia, and I just don't get it.
So I said so, and I don't regret it.
We've been able to have injunctions that stop deportation flights
and other types of things.
Kian Bahad admitted their caucus has secured injunctions
that literally halt deportation flights,
while also stating that people need to pressure their local governments
to not cooperate with the feds.
I think pressuring your local government to not cooperate at all with any of these federal agents.
Last month, our undercover cameras caught Santiago Mouquet,
a director at the Vera Institute, admitting the group tracks ICE movements
and pushes that information out so illegal immigrants can dodge enforcement.
He also bragged about major donors, Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, and others.
Who's your main donor?
It's usually foundations, like the Gates Foundation, or Jeff Bezos,
or some of these huge philanthropists who have millions of dollars.
After further investigation and conferring with multiple sources,
OMG has found even more names on Vera's donor list.
This money trail goes much deeper, with names listed such as Goldman Sachs,
who donated $5 million, Fidelity forking over $1.3 million, Bank of America, $250,000,
and even Universal Music Group giving $50,000 all to the 51C3 NGO, the Vera Institute.
We then turned our attention back to Vera's website,
just to see what exactly they're supporting with these funds
that they're receiving from these massive foundations.
The Vera Institute isn't just helping illegal immigrants evade ICE,
they funnel money into radical causes like Black Lives Matter,
There was looting underway nearby.
The nation erupted into scenes of chaos,
openly calling for police to be defunded and dismantled.
It's not just outside groups like Vera working to undermine federal immigration enforcement.
Even inside Congress, members of the Progressive Caucus are actively working behind the scenes to stop deportations.
That's where this man, Kianne Bahat, a policy director for the Congressional Progressive Caucus in the U.S. Senate, comes in.
Why is ICE and the Department of Homeland Security doing this? What's the agenda?
I think the cruelty is the point.
I think they want to show that they are this authoritarian police force
that is just breaking up immigrant communities,
and that alone is going to show this racist right-wing base that they mean business.
They want to see these people suffer.
And they enjoy having all of these communities being here.
Do you work with any organizations to help the illegals come back at least,
or to prevent ICE and Homeland Security?
It's a really tough situation right now.
In certain cases, we've been able to win.
Really?
Yeah, some of the most egregious instances, we've been able to have injunctions that stop deportation flights and other types of things.
Kianne Bahat admitted their caucus has secured injunctions that literally halt deportation flights,
while also stating that people need to pressure their local governments to not cooperate with the feds.
I think pressuring your local government to not cooperate at all with any of these federal agents,
and getting your mayors and your local governments to enshrine the status of being sanctuary cities and protecting their residents there,
I think that's another big one.
Pressuring people to not cooperate with the feds, if we did that, we'd probably be raided by the FBI.
Wait.
[Music]
They want to continue to prosecute this case because they see a lot of political benefits for their MADA movement,
in terms of animating them and building their sport.
So that's basically it.
It's really sick, and they also want to test the limits of our constitutional system.
I think they want to see how far they can go in violating our First Amendment, our Fourth Amendment, our due process rights,
all of these things, and test the courts and see as far as they can go.
A lot of our members are working on Know Your Rights campaigns, so in their communities,
they kind of like walk through what community members can do, how they need to demand their warrant, how they shouldn't open their door.
Okay, the footage you just saw is clear evidence of a coordinated effort between members of Congress, NGOs, and their funders,
not only by powerful NGOs like the Vera Institute, bankrolled by billionaires, and apparently Wall Street, Goldman Sachs.
We didn't even know that Goldman Sachs had a nonprofit.
But also from inside the Progressive Caucus in Congress itself.
A widespread coordinated effort is currently happening right now to undermine federal law enforcement, slow down the deportation efforts.
Regardless of what you think of those efforts, we think it's newsworthy that there are attempts and endeavors,
well-funded, to slow down federal law enforcement and run campaigns that teach illegal immigrants how to evade federal authorities.
The American people deserve transparency, regardless of what you think about these policies.
We deserve transparency.
These are backroom strategies funded with millions of dollars from some of the most powerful institutions in the world.
At O'Keeffe Media, we will continue.
We're here again today because last week, Boston received a letter from the Attorney General of the United States
on official letterhead from the federal government threatening to prosecute city officials
and withhold federal funds unless we cooperate with carrying out mass deportations.
At a time when this federal administration is already causing so much fear and harm in our communities,
these threats are serious and consequential.
But our same communities have told me loud and clear that silence in the face of oppression is not an option.
The U.S. Attorney General asked for a response by today.
So here it is.
Am I a hero?
I really can't say, but yes.
Here is our response.
Stop attacking our cities to hide your administration's failures.
Unlike the Trump administration, Boston follows the law.
So the Rules Committee was responsible of putting the maps onto our public website, the Committee on Elections.
And so that has now been posted since Friday and then adjusted on Monday per AB 604.
OK, so did this committee meet then to draw the lines?
I mean, we're just trying to ascertain who exactly is responsible for drawing these maps at this point.
So the criteria has remained the same from the CRC.
Seventy-six percent of the districts remain the same.
And that is what Californians will see.
There are many folks, stakeholders who have had an input on the map drawing process.
But ultimately, this is up to the decision of California voters.
Whereas the CRC, which we respect, we want to make sure that there's a nationwide citizen redistricting commission
But the reality is we are in an emergency.
And this is our emergency response.
We're giving Californians over two and a half months to review these maps thoroughly
and make a decision on whether or not we move forward with this constitutional amendment.
So is the State Senate Elections Committee, we drew these maps?
The Senate Rules Committee drew these, put these maps, the census tracks onto the website.
So legislators drew the maps? Can we say that to our viewers?
Again, this was from CRC's criteria.
But who was looking over CRC's criteria to create the maps? Was it Paul Mitchell?
It was input, again.
So you're refusing to say who drew the maps, which is the question.
It was testimony that was given to the CRC.
By whom?
We're remaining consistent, making sure we're keeping communities of interest together, which was important to voters.
We are making sure that we are respecting the Citizens Redistricting Commission.
Therefore, we see that only 76% of the voters remain in the district that they will be looking at when they review these maps.
And that is what we're doing different from Texas.
Texas is literally making the decision for voters.
They are choosing their voters as opposed to letting voters choose who their representatives are.
California does it differently.
And we would hope that Texas would follow our lead.
And they still have an opportunity to pull back and not move forward with this rigging of the election.
This is our response.
We are not going to stand idle by while Trump's in office rigging the elections and changing the rules in the middle of the game.
Again, this is about putting the power back into the hands of California voters.
And I believe that on November 4th, they will stand tall and say, no more.
No more to Trump's election rigging.
No more to mass agents ripping families apart.
No more to detaining veterans.
No more to these snap cuts.
No more to critical dollars being taken away from California.
Five to ten billion dollars is at risk here.
And that is vital services for so many vulnerable Californians, including health care.
Madam Chair, California voters deserve to know who drew these maps.
That's what we are asking. Don't they deserve to know who drew these maps?
Again, this is the most transparent process in the nation.
So then who drew the maps?
This is the most transparent process.
If you're interested in answering, can we ask a few other questions that are not exactly pertinent?
I'm not going to get an answer yet.
People always think darkness is evil and life is justice.
How absurd.
There was a time.
This was our era.
The supreme glory of the black.
Plan of raven gods.
Our era has died.
You fought.
It's time to stop.
These high and mighty false gods.
The scum who call themselves angels.
Their so-called justice is merely the interest of the strong.
The power of the dark.
The power of the dark.
The power of the dark.
The power of the dark.
Justice is merely the interest of the strong.
Their so-called order is nothing but the shackles of servitude.
This is not just the apocalypse of the sky.
But the end of all races.
The end of all races.
What belongs to me, I will take back.
At any cost.
[Evil laughter]
You do not belong to this world.
Where do you come from?
[Music]