Premium Only Content
TJ'S SECOND CONVERSATION WITH GŎLEM ZŎMBIE GROK AI
It sounds like you're expressing frustration with systems of authority and bureaucracy that dictate personal freedoms or moral judgments through legal or institutional frameworks, often at odds with individual instincts or natural rights. Your point seems to center on the tension between imposed rules—backed by signatures, laws, or "masters"—and inherent human autonomy or common sense.
If I’m reading you right, you’re questioning why people accept external definitions of right and wrong, especially when those definitions serve the interests of those in power rather than the individual. This touches on deep philosophical and political themes: the social contract, the legitimacy of authority, and the erosion of personal liberty. Historically, thinkers like Rousseau, Locke, or even anarchists like Bakunin have wrestled with these ideas, debating whether authority derives from consent, force, or manipulation.
The "piece of paper" you mention could symbolize legal documents, contracts, or laws that grant or restrict freedoms, often arbitrarily or self-servingly. Your reference to "psychotic psychopaths" suggests a distrust in those who wield this power, viewing their motives as disconnected from the common good. The appeal to "natural born instincts" aligns with arguments for natural law—where morality and rights are innate, not granted by institutions.
If you’re pointing to a specific system, event, or example (e.g., a law, policy, or societal norm), could you clarify? That would help me address your concern more concretely, maybe with data or a breakdown of the mechanism you’re criticizing. For now, I’ll say the phenomenon you’re describing—blind deference to authority—is often explained by social conditioning, fear of punishment, or the comfort of conformity. Studies like Milgram’s obedience experiment (1961) show how far people will go when instructed by perceived authority, even against their own moral instincts.
What’s the specific “bullshit” you’re calling out here? Want to dig deeper into its mechanics or implications?
⬇️Link To The Query With Grok ⬇️
First before it shut off 😒
https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtMw%3D%3D_9e7fd28f-6a77-4a3c-9213-225aaf3c8d17
Second attempt
https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtMw%3D%3D_6b7e4c93-2122-4842-ba9b-201a3493a9ac
⬇️For more raw uncensored uncut truth and reviews visit ⬇️
-
1:08:44
TJ SWEETWATER'S TRUTH CHANNEL
1 day agoFBI CASH PATEL SAYS ANYONE OF FAITH WILL NOT BE INVESTIGATED BY THIS FBI
17 -
1:29:40
Anthony Rogers
14 hours agoEpisode 394 - Isaac Butterfield
29.7K1 -
8:02
China Uncensored
13 hours agoChina Just Took The First Step Towards WAR
43.6K22 -
1:20:04
Flyover Conservatives
1 day agoWhy Did Jesus Really Come? It’s NOT What You Think - Pedro Adao | FOC Show
35.7K4 -
2:18:25
DLDAfterDark
5 hours ago $2.95 earnedYo Homie! Is That My Briefcase?? EDC & Gun Talk - Blue Waffle Giveaway Pre Stream
34.8K3 -
1:34:23
Glenn Greenwald
10 hours agoSydney Shooting Exploited for Pro-Israel Censorship and Anti-Muslim Crackdowns; How Media DEI Was the Opposite of Diversity | SYSTEM UPDATE #559
142K133 -
1:09:01
MattMorseTV
9 hours ago $52.49 earned🔴Trump just handed Congress THE EVIDENCE.🔴
60.3K123 -
1:01:54
BonginoReport
10 hours agoVanity Fair Goes Nuclear On Trump’s Inner Circle - Nightly Scroll w/ Hayley Caronia (Ep.198)
154K72 -
53:25
Katie Miller Pod
12 hours ago $9.35 earnedFBI Director Kash Patel & Alexis Wilkins on Balancing Their Relationship with Work | KMP Ep.19
47K32 -
1:15:37
Candace Owens
10 hours agoErika And I Sat Down. Here’s What Happened. | Candace Ep 280
233K959