Premium Only Content

TJ'S SECOND CONVERSATION WITH GŎLEM ZŎMBIE GROK AI
It sounds like you're expressing frustration with systems of authority and bureaucracy that dictate personal freedoms or moral judgments through legal or institutional frameworks, often at odds with individual instincts or natural rights. Your point seems to center on the tension between imposed rules—backed by signatures, laws, or "masters"—and inherent human autonomy or common sense.
If I’m reading you right, you’re questioning why people accept external definitions of right and wrong, especially when those definitions serve the interests of those in power rather than the individual. This touches on deep philosophical and political themes: the social contract, the legitimacy of authority, and the erosion of personal liberty. Historically, thinkers like Rousseau, Locke, or even anarchists like Bakunin have wrestled with these ideas, debating whether authority derives from consent, force, or manipulation.
The "piece of paper" you mention could symbolize legal documents, contracts, or laws that grant or restrict freedoms, often arbitrarily or self-servingly. Your reference to "psychotic psychopaths" suggests a distrust in those who wield this power, viewing their motives as disconnected from the common good. The appeal to "natural born instincts" aligns with arguments for natural law—where morality and rights are innate, not granted by institutions.
If you’re pointing to a specific system, event, or example (e.g., a law, policy, or societal norm), could you clarify? That would help me address your concern more concretely, maybe with data or a breakdown of the mechanism you’re criticizing. For now, I’ll say the phenomenon you’re describing—blind deference to authority—is often explained by social conditioning, fear of punishment, or the comfort of conformity. Studies like Milgram’s obedience experiment (1961) show how far people will go when instructed by perceived authority, even against their own moral instincts.
What’s the specific “bullshit” you’re calling out here? Want to dig deeper into its mechanics or implications?
⬇️Link To The Query With Grok ⬇️
First before it shut off 😒
https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtMw%3D%3D_9e7fd28f-6a77-4a3c-9213-225aaf3c8d17
Second attempt
https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtMw%3D%3D_6b7e4c93-2122-4842-ba9b-201a3493a9ac
⬇️For more raw uncensored uncut truth and reviews visit ⬇️
-
55:56
TJ SWEETWATER'S TRUTH CHANNEL
20 days agoThe Facts Are Clear
281 -
12:37
itsSeanDaniel
1 day agoFake Republican REFUSES to Stand Up for Charlie Kirk
12.1K21 -
1:01:55
MTNTOUGH Podcast w/ Dustin Diefenderfer
21 hours agoJason Khalipa: American Men: Get Off the Couch and Rise Up Now | MTNPOD #133
20.4K43 -
5:17
Blackstone Griddles
12 hours agoEasy Weeknight Meals: Creamy Parmesan Beef Pasta
11.7K3 -
7:08
Rena Malik, M.D.
22 hours ago $1.02 earnedFour totally surprising causes of Back Pain
10.7K1 -
6:27
DropItLikeItsScott
14 hours ago $0.77 earnedIs This the Coolest Gun Accessory Ever? The Gun Guardian
12.2K -
19:05
Michael Feyrer Jr
23 hours agoCan you even fit this much FAIL in one video? $10K Challenge Week 1
9.87K -
19:53
Professor Nez
16 hours agoYou WON’T BELIEVE What I Found on Charlie Kirk’s Shooter!
12.3K22 -
1:35:53
The China Show
18 hours ago $1.40 earnedBrutal Mayhem in China as Dark Coverups are Exposed - #280
17.5K7 -
12:30:34
Times Now World
1 day agoLIVE | Russia-Belarus Zapad-2025 LIVE | Missiles Target NATO in Arctic & Baltic
28.2K3