WEBSITE GALORE (8-24-25)

Website Galore (but make it chaos).
Tonight’s stream unpacked the whole “who-built-the-website” saga, the eternal privacy strike vs. copyright strike confusion, and the line that launched a thousand comment wars: “weaponize my ex.” We break down what was actually said on-air versus what got spun afterward—plus the receipts people claim to have (and the ones they don’t).

What we covered (in human words):

The website debate: who allegedly bought it, who “condoned” it, and who says they had zero prior knowledge.

“We don’t dig… but sometimes we dig”: backroom info-sharing vs. public doxxing accusations.

Privacy strikes ≠ copyright strikes—why people keep mixing them up and what each one reveals (or doesn’t).

The “weaponize my ex” quote: intent, interpretation, and the fallout.

Gray-rock vows, “game on” chest-thumping, and why manufactured outrage keeps trending.

Fundraiser talk: claims, counters, and “the attorney has it” updates.

Cameos: Reality Loses co-hosts; Craig provides background color commentary at full volume.

Vibe check: commentary, not a crusade. We’re recapping public statements made on a public stream and pushing for clarity over chaos.

Disclaimer & Community Note
This description summarizes on-stream statements, allegations, and opinions. Allegations remain unproven unless verified by official records. Do not harass, contact, or dox anyone mentioned. If something here is off, drop verifiable sources and we’ll review.
📌 FULL LIVE HERE - https://www.youtube.com/live/s_GWASHGYCM?si=DvPVXqEzShHp_52z

📌 ALL CLIPS OBTAINED AND USED UNDER FAIR USE:
The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act states:

“Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106a, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.”

This video, and my YouTube channel in general, may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for one or more of the reasons noted above.

📌 Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCgSKmkXzVsuXIN5iQuKEhVw/join
👉 DMCA Attorney
Copyright Strikes
Protect your privacy from trolls and stalkers
Counterdmca.com