Whaaaaat???

A loosely structured, off-the-cuff Sunday livestream that starts casual (greetings, birthday shout-out) and quickly turns into a defensive monologue responding to chat accusations and long-running creator drama. Most of the runtime is the host reacting to live comments and naming viewers, not presenting new evidence.

Central conflict (per the host)

Alleged “website”/domain incident. Chatters accuse the host of involvement with a domain (described as an “Illuminati” domain bought in a rival’s name). The host repeatedly denies creating, owning, or promoting it and says others (“Kim & Craftton”) have already stated she had no prior knowledge.

Compilation video making the rounds. A packaged clip reel (posted on “Chason/Chasing”’s community tab) shows segments from the host’s panels where guests discussed a rival’s child/trauma. The host refuses to play it on-stream, calls it bait and potentially manipulated, and says she’ll only review it privately and compare against her original VODs.

Accountability vs. ongoing harassment. The host says she already took accountability—for allowing guests to say things on her panel—by sitting on another creator’s panel (“Jonesen’s”) for six hours and apologizing. She argues that this doesn’t justify months of what she calls targeted harassment from rivals.

Claims & denials (host’s side, not independently verified)

Denials:

Didn’t make/know about the website before it was mentioned.

Never discussed the rival’s child’s trauma.

Never read the rival’s documents on her channel.

Didn’t ask anyone to “fight her battles.”

Claims of wrongdoing by others:

Being mocked about her rape and domestic violence history; insults toward her children; doxxing of deceased friends; false grooming allegations against her partner; threats/boasts about drones or trail cams near her property; attempts to interfere with her children’s benefits; monetizing harassment.

Says a previous clip was faked to make it look like she was present during another channel’s problematic segment.

Critical note: the host does not show receipts during this stream. She references “timelines,” “messages,” or prior admissions by others, but doesn’t surface links, timestamps, or screenshots here.

How she manages the live

Moderation: Repeatedly asks mods to block/remove dissenting chatters; tells “people from over there” to leave. Removes at least one commenter in real time.

Tone: Agitated, profane at times, and confrontational. Alternates between addressing individual usernames and venting. There’s circular repetition—“I didn’t make the website,” “I already apologized,” “this is a setup/bait,” “get receipts.”

Boundary setting: Refuses to go on the rival’s panel to apologize; says any further communication should go through her attorney. Threatens copyright strikes against “snipers” restreaming audio and says she’ll switch to members-only mode.

Points of tension/inconsistency a non-supporter will notice

Evidence gap: She insists others “already admitted” things but won’t review or show the circulating video on-stream, and provides no direct receipts during this broadcast.

“I don’t watch them” vs. detailed awareness: She says she doesn’t watch “hate channels” but recounts specific claims and posts from those channels.

Website timeline confusion: She denies prior knowledge, while chat claims there are dated clips showing otherwise. She counters by saying she’ll compare dates privately—again, no on-stream proof.

Cast cheat-sheet (as referenced)

Host: “BJ/Britney.”

Opponents mentioned: “Clue,” “Cletus,” “Chason/Chasing.”

Former panel guests/allies in question: “Kim & Craftton.”

Others named in chat back-and-forth: Aisha, Ocean Loving Lady, Bri/Britney (viewer), Reality, Shady (mod), Kelsey, Boston, Jay (alleged “sniper”), QB (moving to Rumble), etc.

What actually happens by the end

Host rejects playing the compilation, asserts prior apologies stand, labels the current push “a setup,” instructs mods to purge detractors, and says she’ll relaunch in members-only and issue strikes against restreams. Stream ends with the promise to return shortly behind paywall.

Bottom line (non-supporter’s read)

It’s a defensive, grievance-heavy stream with no fresh evidence. The host reiterates denials, frames criticism as coordinated bait, clamps down on dissent in chat, and escalates to legal/strike threats. If you’re not a supporter, you come away with lots of claims, few receipts, and no direct engagement with the circulating video beyond refusing to show it. Content warnings throughout: sexual assault, domestic violence, harassment/doxing allegations, and insults.
📌 FULL LIVE HERE - https://www.youtube.com/live/KYspu1jz_R0?si=mPAnuxmMY64JEauZ

📌 ALL CLIPS OBTAINED AND USED UNDER FAIR USE:
The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act states:

“Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106a, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.”

This video, and my YouTube channel in general, may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for one or more of the reasons noted above.

📌 Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCgSKmkXzVsuXIN5iQuKEhVw/join

👉 DMCA Attorney
Copyright Strikes
Protect your privacy from trolls and stalkers
Counterdmca.com