Premium Only Content

Statutes Are Not Laws
Confusion over the Bill of Rights and the so called "law".
Statutes are not laws.
Any legislative body can only REGULATE COMMERCE.
So without a living being or property being harmed, no crime has taken place.
All the rest is smoke & mirror BS statutes.
We used to have booze free Sundays, and stores closes on Sundays, and even in prohibition, they couldn't arrest you for the consumption, only the selling & distribution.
If they created a statute that it was illegal to eat jellybeans on Sunday, is that a law?
Would a jury convict me of a "crime" if I was caught eating jellybeans on Sunday? Not likely.
But a statutory jury in and administrative court would direct them to do so.
But under the "common law", which is the law regarding private rights, nobody would because my eating jelly beans hasn't harmed anyone.
And that's the deciding factor.
All the rest is consent and contracts of commerce.
They trick the people into being in commerce.
So once you have the lens to SEE this, it's easy to extrapolate from it.
If the Bill of Rights isn't being respected, isn't that warring against the Constitution?
Don't the two go hand in hand?
That IS the contract to constrain the so called government right?
But the government isn't the government anymore.
They are private corporations.
You hear a lot about the Articles these days in Trump 2.0 and thank God we are.
This is so unfamiliar to people that the super ignorant who support the looney left topics consider it to be tyrannical when one is following the Constitution because of FEELINGS.
Article I is legislative. Legislative controls commerce.
Unless a court is specifically Article III it's Article I and you have no rights in those courts.
They are fictitious.
Article II is the powers of the president/executive branch.
Article III is judicial.
Not all courts are created equal in fact I'd say it's the biggest legal fockery of a lifetime.
I discovered a judgment against me declared by a Justice of the Peach (laughing) where I was never served, never mailed anything, and the judgement never hit my credit.
But the attorneys can claim a victory and probably got paid by whomever hired them.
But it was completely unlawful and administrative.
I reported it to the state judiciary ethics.
Crickets.
You know what they do?
Only monitor the personal behavior of the judge, which doesn't count IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURTROOM.
This is legal fockery.
Join the fight at https://InalienableUniversity.com
-
4:21
Legal Fockery With Gianna & Scott
9 days agoWhat If Your Rights Are Violated?
191 -
6:59:16
BaldBrad
7 hours agoCharlie Kirk Memorial LIVESTREAM
13.6K3 -
5:13:13
Professor Nez
1 day ago🚨Charlie Kirk Funeral LIVE: Trump Honors Kirk in Arizona 🇺🇸
14.4K8 -
22:13
iCkEdMeL
8 hours ago $10.26 earnedMass Shooting at Wedding Reception — Witnesses Say Shooter Yelled “Free Palestine”
100K39 -
0:36
Danny Rayes
2 days ago $4.29 earnedFacebook Needs To Be Stopped...
87.2K19 -
10:12:19
Total Horse Channel
23 hours agoAMHA World Show 2025 9/21
118K8 -
1:29:02
Game On!
1 day ago $7.77 earnedTHEY'RE BACK! NFL Wise Guys Return For Week 3 BEST BETS!
79.1K4 -
6:16
China Uncensored
9 hours agoHow Trump Plans on Stopping Russia and China—Without Firing a Shot!
291K46 -
33:13
Ohio State Football and Recruiting at Buckeye Huddle
21 hours agoOhio State Football: 10 Things We Learned Watching Washington's Win over Colorado State
160K -
1:14:04
NAG Entertainment
21 hours agoKickback w/ Leon - Rocket League: Road to GC
92.7K