Part 2 of Latest Updates/Breaking Cases

Tonight’s True-Crime Hangout w/ Britney & Craig
A community night that swings from cozy cat cameos to tough conversations. We unpack breaking details in the Laken Snelling (KY) case, touch on the Hendersonville twins appeal (Lindsey Lowe), and take a deep dive into the Mackenzie Shirilla crash case—playing key interview/jail-call clips and discussing accountability, evidence, and media narratives.

Content notes: strong language; discussion of child death, sexual misconduct, and violence. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in court.

What we cover

Warm-up, chat shout-outs, Mabel the cat, and a few laughs (“Do it, lady” clip)

Laken Snelling (University of Kentucky cheerleader): charges (abuse of a corpse, tampering, concealing a birth), preliminary autopsy labeled undetermined pending histology; safe-haven options and ethics discussion

Hendersonville, TN: brief update that Lindsey Lowe (2011 case) was granted a hearing that could lead to a new trial

Mackenzie Shirilla (Strongsville, OH): crash video context, event-data findings presented at trial, conviction & sentence; family interview highlights; jail-call excerpts and reactions

Chapters (approx.)
00:00 Welcome, community check-ins, Mabel the cat
07:30 Brief debate on teacher–student scandals (then we move on)
15:00 Viral chuckle break (“Do it, lady”)
23:30 CASE 1 – Laken Snelling (KY): charges & autopsy status
36:50 CASE 2 – Hendersonville twins (TN): hearing granted
46:00 CASE 3 – Mackenzie Shirilla (OH): timeline, data, court findings
1:58:00 Family interview takeaways
2:03:00 Jail-call clips & discussion
2:37:00 Closing notes

Credits (fair use commentary/education):

Court TV (expert discussion on autopsy & evidentiary standards)

Phone Calls From Prison (compiled jail-call audio)

If you need support: If a topic here hits close to home, consider local resources for safe-haven laws, crisis lines, or counseling in your area.
📌 ALL CLIPS OBTAINED AND USED UNDER FAIR USE:
The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act states:

“Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106a, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.”

This video, and my YouTube channel in general, may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for one or more of the reasons noted above.

📌 Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCgSKmkXzVsuXIN5iQuKEhVw/join
👉 DMCA Attorney
Copyright Strikes
Protect your privacy from trolls and stalkers
Counterdmca.com