Part 47: LBank Access vs. NYPD Excuses | Proof Wallet Tracing Was Possible

Part 47 of the Justice DIY series exposes the contradictions in the NYPD’s closure of Case #2025-120-5286 by comparing their statements with official responses from LBank. While detectives claimed that “the wallet was not hosted anywhere” and implied non-traceability, LBank itself confirmed that law enforcement inquiries can be directed to its dedicated enforcement channel and provided contact details for compliance. This means wallet tracing and subpoena options were available — but ignored. As a victim of crypto fraud certified under CYBERA Ref. c7a00295ba26, I formally demanded documentation from NYPD regarding any wallet tracing, outreach to LBank, or investigative methods used. The absence of transparency or records confirms investigative negligence. This episode highlights how victims must push for accountability, ensure their cases are properly reviewed, and document failures for civil rights and federal claims.

⚠️ Disclaimer
This video is for educational and informational purposes only. It does not provide legal or financial advice. Viewers should consult a qualified attorney for legal guidance.