ILLEGAL CONSIDERATION -- FORECLOSURE DENIED | Montgomery vs Daly, and the Credit River Decision | The Credit River Case - First National Bank of Montgomery v. Daly Exposed That Banks Create Money out of THIN AIR

Taken from: FORECLOSURE DENIED: Montgomery vs Daly, and the Credit River Decision - Defeating the Globalist Crime Syndicate on Their Own Turf Can Be A Perilous Undertaking
https://rumble.com/v29116a-montgomery-v-daly-and-the-credit-river-decision-defeating-the-globalist-cri.html?e9s=src_v1_cbl%2Csrc_v1_upp_a
.
Jerome Daly is one of the few men to take on the might of the Federal Reserve in the courts and win. 40 years ago, a Minnesota bank attempted to foreclose on Daly's mortgage but he humiliated them, thanks to his profound knowledge of Fractional Reserve Banking and a courageous, scrupulously honest judge. The judge delivered a dynamite decision that blasted the Federal Reserve and National Banks as unconstitutional and fraudulent. Understandably, the bankers have tried to bury this case and keep the controversial decree from public knowledge.
.
Those of you who may be facing the grim prospect of foreclosure on your mortgage, or if you know someone who is facing foreclosure, then the incredible story of Jerome Daly will delight and amaze you.
.
Jerome Daly was an attorney in Minnesota in the 1960s. In May, 1964, he took out a mortgage for $14,000 with The First National Bank of Montgomery, Minnesota, on a property described as Lot 19, Fairview Beach, Scott County, Minnesota.
.
Somehow, three years later, Mr. Daly fell behind on his mortgage payments and the bank initiated proceedings to foreclose. The case was heard before a jury in Credit River Township, Scott County, Minnesota, at 10 a.m. on December 7th, 1968. The trial justice was Martin V. Mahoney, a remarkable, no-nonsense man of great integrity and fair-play.
.
Jerome Daly, being a lawyer, defended himself. The main witness for the prosecution was a Lawrence V. Morgan, President of The First National Bank of Montgomery.
.
The main issues were whether or not the loan transaction constituted a legal “consideration” and whether or not Mr. Daly waived his rights to complain by having paid his loan for three years.
.
For any loan transaction to be legal and binding a lawful “consideration” must be brought to the table by both parties. Mr. Daly said that as a consideration he put up his property of Lot 19, Fairview Beach. Mr. Daly further asserted that the bank provided no consideration but merely created the money out of thin air!
.
Read document HERE: https://dailynewsfromaolf.substack.com/p/the-credit-river-case-first-national?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1300612&post_id=172876901&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=x2sr&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email