Why Studies Matter and Why Turkesterone Needs More Human Data

Save 10% at Tigerfitness.com with coupon code "MAHA"

Here’s the real talk on supplements, science, and Turkesterone. Claims are easy. Proof is hard. In this video I break down why solid human studies are the only way to separate hype from results—and why Turkesterone specifically needs more high-quality human data before anyone crowns it the next big muscle builder.

What you’ll learn:

What actually counts as evidence (observational vs. randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trials)

How good trials are built: preregistration, sample size/power, control of training and diet, validated outcomes

The difference between mechanisms, animal/in-vitro data, and real-world human results

The state of Turkesterone research today—and the gaps that still need to be filled

A practical checklist you can use to judge ANY supplement claim

If we were designing the Turkesterone trial we all want:

Participants: trained lifters, not beginners

Standardized program + protein intake, compliance tracked

Dosing verified (third-party assay), multiple arms (low, high, placebo)

Outcomes that matter: DEXA/ultrasound lean mass, 1RM/rep strength, performance, safety labs

Timeline long enough to see changes (≥12 weeks), then replication by an independent lab

My stance:

No data, no deal. Mechanism is interesting, but humans lifting weights over months is the proof. Until solid human RCTs land, treat Turkesterone as unproven and manage expectations (and your wallet).

If you’re into evidence-based training and supplementation, hit subscribe and drop your thoughts below—what would YOU want to see in the definitive Turkesterone study?

#Turkesterone #EvidenceBased #fitnessscience #Supplements #Muscle #Hypertrophy #StrengthTraining