Carolyn Yeager ~Dreyfus Was Guilty!

With echoes of Leo Frank and the ADL, the Dreyfus affair shows how Jews organize to protect their criminals by bullying their way into getting the verdict they want. n 1894 in France, a Jewish artillery captain, Alfred Dreyfus, was accused of passing secrets to the Germans. It was followed by a long judicial process. The "Dreyfus affair" vehemently divided France, with accusations of bribery, perjury, forgery, and even murders. In 1906, Dreyfus was finally acquitted. The affair has continued to be controversial. It has been interpreted in the context of both anti-Semitic influence and Jewish influence. Some have argued for a strong case for Dreyfus being guilty. See the "External links" section. Margaret Huffstickler brings us a detailed examination of the Dreyfus Affair in turn-of-the-century France, including new information coming forth suggesting that Jewish Army Officer Alfred Dreyfus was indeed guilty as charged. The evidence against Dreyfus was very strong, yet a certain element in society insisted on his innocence; The head rabbi of France tells the Paris Police Chief that if Dreyfus is prosecuted it will create a war that will split France in two;
35 million francs pour into France for Dreyfus' defense, mainly from England and Germany, and many new newspapers spring up for the same purpose;
After Dreyfus goes to prison, a long campaign begins to appeal the verdict, which is not above carrying out bribery, perjury, forgery and even murder;
Even after Dreyfus is pardoned, his Jewish supporters continue on to get him declared legally innocent of all charges.
The whole affair was as we have so oftten seen before when a Jew is in trouble wih the law, was characterized as antisemitism, pure and simple, and even today that is universally presented as the one and only lesson of the Dreyfus Affair; From it the League of the Rights of Man was launched in France, the counterpart of the ADL in the U.S.