Rob D’Amico on Trump Indicting Opponents: ‘It’s Hard to Refute That It’s Not Revenge’

RUSH TRANSCRIPT:
WITT: “So who are these others? And how do you interpret his claim that this is not revenge?”

D’AMICO: “Well, it’s.Hard to. Refute that. That it’s not revenge because he said it. He’s he’s it’s his own words. But I think John Brennan is going to be one. In the. And I think. Even if. He can find something on General Milley, those are prominent ones that he really disliked on how they they went public on certain things. So I think that but they, they also expect it. And this is scary, that the fact that you could have even very supportive people, ag bondi and the dag and the us attorney who was doing the bidding, saying it was a and then firing that U.S. Attorney and getting one that has no prosecution experience to actually seek an indictment. I think the risk of some some legal malpractice probably in there, but it’s showing that it doesn’t even like even with the professionals, not a strong case can bring an indictment. But what I don’t know, you know, the people that are supporting this, don’t they think, like when the roles are reversed and the Democrats eventually the democratic president’s going to come in, do they not expect that? Like this? Kash Patel? Not expect to be charged or whatever. It reminds me of like when we went into Iraq. We got rid of saddam hussein, a Sunni. And our mistake was we thought we were bringing the shiites in and that they would say, wait, we’re prosecuted for so long that they’re going to expect fair treatment back to sunnis. And they did the exact opposite. They took revenge on them. And I think I just don’t want to see that in the future. I don’t want to see revenge. Tit for tat. But I think that’s what it’s going to end up being, because this is opening up the cards to just like, again, going after political enemies. And I think it’s going to have to naturally take the next course on the next administration.”