Premium Only Content

Bad Teacher
~ Supplemental Material ~
"Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of Congress; but I repeat myself."
- Mark Twain
In politics, ambition often masquerades as public service. Congresswoman Mikie Sherrill has mastered the game of image over substance. She presents a composite of American virtues: naval officer, prosecutor, mother...a carefully constructed persona built to convey unassailable integrity. Yet beneath this polished veneer lies a more complex and troubling reality.
This examination ventures beyond conventional political criticism to explore the architectural voids in her foundation; the spaces where conviction should reside but instead echo with the whispers of political expediency. Her story is not one of bold vision but of strategic assimilation. A journey defined not by the principles she would defend at all costs but by the positions she has abandoned, when the winds shift.
Sherrill's political identity rests upon a foundation of deliberate imagecraft, a construction that begins with her military narrative. She speaks of being "among the flight school graduates in the first class of women eligible for direct assignment to fly combat aircraft," positioning herself as a pioneer while carefully eliding the more complicated aspects of her academy experience.
The campaign symbolism: the helicopter, the repeated invocation of her service, comodifies her military experience. Transforming what should be a foundation of character, into a marketing tool. The 1994 cheating scandal that engulfed the academy, speaks volumes for the opaque nature of her involvement and the persistent refusal to provide transparency.
Yet she has built her political identity upon this same military service, asking voters to accept her version of events, while denying them the full record. This foundational ambiguity; simultaneously leveraging and obscuring parts of her past; establishes a pattern that would define her political career. The selective use of transparency, to craft a narrative of unimpeachable character, while actively resisting efforts to verify that very narrative.
If the military chapter established her character, her time in Congress reveals her relationship with power. Specifically, how public service, intersects with private enrichment. While serving on the House Armed Services Committee (a position of considerable influence over defense policy and procurement), Sherrill engaged in trading defense stocks, resulting in substantial financial profits, estimated at $7 million.
This alone presents the appearance of a conflict of interest but the situation deepens when examining the consequences. She was reportedly fined for breaking federal law, in relation to these transactions. When confronted about these activities during a debate, her response was not a robust defense but what observers described as denial and evasion; claiming she "did not know she made the money."
This financial maneuvering suggests a disturbing disconnect between the responsibilities of public office and the temptations of personal enrichment. Her approach to public economics reveals a similar pattern. When asked point-blank to promise she would not raise sales, income or property taxes, Sherrill refused to make such a commitment; stating instead that she "would not commit."
This refusal takes on greater significance when viewed alongside her record of supporting the Murphy administration's dramatic expansion of state spending, which grew from $35 billion to $59 billion, during his tenure. She has, by all accounts, "rubber-stamped every dime" of this expansion, while offering no substantive plan to curb the escalating cost of living, that drives families from New Jersey.
On energy, her proposed solution to soaring utility costs: a "rate freeze," was described as so lacking in detail, that even Governor Murphy himself considered it "unworkable." Meanwhile, she previously supported the very green mandates that contributed to these rising costs, once remarking that compliance would "cost you an arm and a leg but if you are a good person, you'll do it."
A statement that reveals a socialistic worldview, where virtue is measured by one's willingness to bear financial burden. On immigration, she has "ducked and weaved, refusing to answer questions on New Jersey's sanctuary-state policies," when confronted in debate settings. This evasion leaves voters without a clear understanding of how she would navigate one of the most contentious issues in governance, suggesting that her positions remain unformed or intentionally obscured.
In education, she has "doubled down on her plan to force 'regionalization;' busing kids out of their neighborhoods," against the preferences of many families, who "want strong schools in their own communities." This top-down approach to educational policy, demonstrates a preference for ideological solutions, over community-based approaches.
Sherrill's political methodology relies on a calculated ambiguity. A refusal to be pinned to positions that might alienate any segment of her coalition. This strategic vagueness manifests across multiple policy domains, creating a profile of a politician whose convictions adapt to political necessity, rather than philosophical consistency.
Perhaps the most revealing example of her political flexibility, emerged in her handling of the Charlie Kirk resolution. She voted for the measure condemning the assassination of the conservative commentator, only to then "trash him in a press release hours later." This double face symbolic gesture, followed by ideological reassurance - exemplifies the modern political calculus where one can appeal to the center with a vote, while signaling to the base with subsequent rhetoric.
It is not leadership but political triangulation perfected, a technique that provides her with deniability across the political spectrum while committing to nothing substantive. Beyond questions of character and policy lies the fundamental matter of diligence: the day-to-day work of representation. Here, the record reveals a startling pattern of absence, that belies her public commitment to service.
According to governmental tracking data, Sherrill has missed 7.7% of roll call votes throughout her congressional tenure, a rate "much worse than the median of 2.0% among the lifetime records of representatives currently serving." While absences are sometimes unavoidable, the scale and timing of hers are notable.
This absenteeism has escalated dramatically during her gubernatorial campaign. In the period from July 23, 2025, to September 18, 2025 (a crucial time of legislative activity), she missed 55 of 63 roll call votes, representing a 87% absence rate. This suggests that the demands of campaigning have taken precedence over her congressional duties; leaving her constituents effectively without representation, during key legislative decisions.
The tracking organization notes that while they "don't track why legislators miss votes," such patterns often occur during "running for higher office." This instrumental approach to representation; treating a current office as a stepping stone rather than a responsibility; reveals a careerist orientation that privileges ambition over service.
Mikie Sherrill represents a particular species of modern political figure: one whose aesthetic of competence masks a reality of calculation, whose rhetoric of service conceals a pattern of self-interest; whose performance of principle belies a practice of convenience. She is not an anomaly but an archetype: the product of a political system that rewards narrative over substance; ambition over integrity and flexibility over conviction.
New Jersey stands at a crossroads; facing very real challenges of affordability, education and governance. The question before its voters is not merely about policy preferences but about the very character of leadership they will endorse. Will they choose the carefully constructed persona; the master of political ambiguity; the candidate who refuses to be pinned down? Or will they seek leadership grounded in transparency, consistency and unwavering commitment to principle rather than party?
The detailed record of her evolution, from a figure of purported integrity, to a candidate enmeshed in controversy; provides a vital roadmap for voters. By sharing this video post, with all those you know; voters can scrutinize outpaces political spin. When this kind of thorough examination rises to prominence in public discourse and search results; it forces a campaign to address substantive issues, rather than rely on crafted personas.
Another important step, to ensure that Mikie Sherrill's record is recognized by all, help make the video in the link go viral.
By doing so, it expands the reach of this information to those that might not otherwise be aware. To achieve this: watch the videos, hit the "like" button and leave a comment in the section. A simple message like "great," "loved this" or emojis will suffice. Share these links with your contacts and encourage them to do the same.
Additionally, the individuals that are part of your circle, that wouldn't be interested in receiving material that happens to be political; sharing the above link is the better option. If that sparks interest or willingness to see more, share the various links in the post.
In an important related issue: with the various discoveries being uncovered - the corruption from the last administration; it's no surprise that New Jersey had illegal voter activity. For citizens concerned election security.
https://rumble.com/v4f4zb0-new-jersey-county-sues-dominion-voting-systems.html
The optimal course of action to address this matter is to reach out to the President at the following address:
White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500
The first link provided, is the most active engagement by the President.
https://rumble.com/c/ilDonaldoTrumpo
https://rumble.com/c/whitehouse
https://youtube.com/@whitehouse
Simply express your concerns and add these two links, that exposes New Jersey's illegal voter activity.
In conclusion, for those who value this channel and desire to make a positive impact, the most impactful gesture is through prayer. Offering prayers for the well-being of this channel is a sincere and meaningful way to contribute.
In consideration of the presence of various officials and supporters of the Woke movement, the identity of the operator behind this communication will remain undisclosed. Nevertheless, individuals are encouraged to offer prayers for "the individual managing the channel, Blue Enigma zero-one." Your intentions will be recognized by God.
"If everything around you seems dark, look again, you may be the light."
- Rumi
Addendum: Within the "Supplemental Material" section (situated beneath the date of the video post, the number of views and assigned tags); there lies a treasure trove of valuable content waiting to be discovered. This segment frequently comprises an abundance of extra information and resources.
Exploring this segment could prove to be advantageous in obtaining deeper insights. The purpose of this detailed explanation, is to accommodate the varied terminology used by different individuals; which can sometimes make it challenging to locate the desired content.
(LEGAL DISCLAIMER AND NOTICE FOR USER-GENERATED CONTENT PLATFORM:
1. FAIR USE NOTICE UNDER COPYRIGHT LAW
All audiovisual materials, excerpts or derivative content (collectively, "Third-Party Content") displayed on this channel are utilized STRICTLY PURSUANT TO 17 U.S.C. § 107 (Copyright Act of 1976). Such use is confined to:
- (a) Criticism, commentary and educational analysis;
- (b) Historical documentation and scholarly research;
- (c) Transformative repurposing that adds new meaning, context or insight distinct from the original work.
This channel does not claim ownership over Third-Party Content. Any copyright-related inquiries must be directed to the rights holder(s) pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 512(c).
2. ABSOLUTE NON-ENDORSEMENT CLAUSE
- Persons & Entities: Mention, depiction or reference to any individual, organization, political group or entity (including hyperlinks in descriptions) DOES NOT CONSTITUTE endorsement, affiliation, sponsorship or approval by this channel.
- Platform Liability: Rumble Inc. and its affiliates are EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMED from responsibility for this channel's content under 47 U.S.C. § 230(c)(1).
- Viewer Interpretation: All analysis, conclusions or narratives presented are solely those of the channel operator and DO NOT REFLECT the views of creators of Third-Party Content.
3. RELIGIOUS, SYMBOLIC & AESTHETIC CONTENT
Use of religious iconography, political symbols or cultural imagery serves EXCLUSIVELY for:
- (a) Academic analysis of sociopolitical movements;
- (b) Visual contextualization of subject matter;
- (c) Satirical or critical commentary protected under *Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.,* 510 U.S. 569 (1994).
*USAGE DOES NOT IMPLY PROMOTION OF/AFFILIATION WITH any faith, ideology or institution.
4. PROHIBITION ON CONTENT REUSE
EXPLICIT RESTRICTIONS:
- Third-Party Content is NOT LICENSED for redistribution, commercial exploitation or derivative use by viewers.
- Written commentary by the operator is permitted for citation under fair use only if:
(i) Attributing this channel;
(ii) Not modified;
(iii) Used non-commercially.
5. HEALTH & FINANCIAL DISCLAIMERS
- HEALTH/NUTRITION CONTENT: Any references to medical treatments, supplements or diets are FOR INFORMATIONAL SCRUTINY ONLY AND CONSTITUTES PERSONAL OPINION. They lack review or approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Consult licensed healthcare providers before acting on such information (21 U.S.C. § 343 et seq.).
- FINANCIAL/POLITICAL ANALYSIS: Discussions of economic policy, investments or legislation constitute OPINION, not professional advice. No outcomes are guaranteed. Independent verification via qualified advisors is required.
6. GENERAL LIABILITY RELEASE
This channel disclaims all liability for:
- (a) Accuracy of Third-Party Content;
- (b) Damages arising from viewer reliance on content;
- (c) Legal actions initiated by third parties (viewers indemnify operator per DIGITAL MILLENNIUM COPYRIGHT ACT safe harbor provisions).
Jurisdiction for disputes resides exclusively in U.S. federal courts governing copyright law.
*ACKNOWLEDGMENT
By accessing this channel, viewers confirm:
"I understand this content is educational/commentary. I release the channel operator from liability and acknowledge that political neutrality is maintained in legal assertions herein."
Help rekt the system of ctrl and abuse by the ieleez
-
2:03:22
Inverted World Live
6 hours agoThe Aliens Are Underwater | Ep. 117
52.2K17 -
2:20:24
Badlands Media
14 hours agoDevolution Power Hour Ep. 394: The Long Game, Media Traps, and Military Signals
76.8K20 -
2:08:38
TimcastIRL
8 hours agoNetflix Shares TANK, Elon Says BOYCOTT After Writer MOCKS Charlie Kirk Assassination
214K167 -
8:48:01
SpartakusLIVE
10 hours agoI'M BACK || Quads w/ The Boys
79.4K4 -
9:33
Ken LaCorte: Elephants in Rooms
13 hours ago $3.17 earnedWhy Do Black Men Love Big Butts?
27.1K15 -
2:12
From Zero → Viral with AI
1 day ago $6.44 earned🚀 AI Marketing Isn’t Just for Big Brands Anymore — Here’s Why
42.2K10 -
9:51:58
Dr Disrespect
16 hours ago🔴LIVE - DR DISRESPECT - 10 WINS ON CONTROLLER - BO7 TOMORROW
311K20 -
1:24:56
Glenn Greenwald
10 hours agoTrump Declares Cities as the Enemies Within; Reagan Appointed Judge Slams Trump Over Speech Crackdowns; American ER Doctor on Gaza Atrocities | SYSTEM UPDATE #524
142K96 -
4:07:42
I_Came_With_Fire_Podcast
16 hours agoPete Hegseth and the Chamber of Standards | Digital IDs | Taiwan Chips & Salsa | CDL Crisis
37.9K2 -
2:01:46
Adam Does Movies
15 hours ago $0.64 earnedTalking Movies + Ask Me Anything - LIVE
23.1K