Premium Only Content
Unambiguous Policy Language Applied
Only Vehicles Listed on Policy as a "Covered Auto" Are Entitled to Defense or Indemnity
Post 5198
ATV Not a Covered Auto
In Acuity, a Mutual Insurance Company v. Peak View Roofing Co., Jeffrey Pierce, and Ty Smith, Civil Action No. 24-cv-01300-MDB, United States District Court, D. Colorado (September 23, 2025) resolved an insurance coverage dispute concerning the duty of the insurer to defend a civil lawsuit.
KEY FACTS:
Parties Involved:
The case involves Plaintiff Acuity, Defendant Smith, Defendant Pierce, and Peak View Roofing Co. (PVRC) .
Underlying Action:
Defendant Smith alleges he was injured on August 19, 2022, while riding as a passenger in a 2018 Polaris Rzr ATV owned by Bluethread Services, LLC d/b/a Peak View Roofing, LLC and operated by Defendant Pierce.
Insurance Policy:
The Rzr was insured under the Policy as "equipment" rather than a "business auto". Plaintiff Acuity sought a determination that it has no duty to defend or indemnify Pierce or PVRC .
LEGAL PRINCIPLES:
Contract Interpretation:
An insurance policy is a contract that should be interpreted in line with well-settled principles of contract interpretation. Courts should give the words in the contract their plain and ordinary meaning unless contrary intent is evidenced in the policy. Courts construe coverage provisions liberally in favor of the insured to provide the broadest possible coverage.
Policy Terms:
The policy specifically states that coverage applies only to those autos shown as covered autos. The Rzr is listed as "Scheduled Contractor's Equipment" under the Policy's Commercial Inland Marine Coverage and is not, therefore, a covered auto.
Undisputed Material Facts
The Rzr was not listed on the Policy as a “Business Auto.” The Rzr is listed in the Policy as “Scheduled Contractor's Equipment” under the Policy's Commercial Inland Marine Coverage. The Contractor's Equipment Coverage Form does not include coverage for bodily injury or create a duty of defense or indemnity on the part of Acuity.
ANALYSIS
Whether there is a genuine dispute as to a material fact depends upon whether the evidence presents a sufficient disagreement to require submission to a jury or conversely, whether the evidence is so one-sided that one party must prevail as a matter of law.
Here, the threshold question was whether the Court should look beyond the explicit terms of the Policy-which lists the Rzr as equipment-in an attempt to uncover some underlying intent to include the Rzr as a covered auto. The Court saw no basis for doing so.
While it is true that a court should look to the parties' intent to resolve “ambiguities” in an insurance policy, this is not a case of ambiguity. Indeed, there can be no dispute over the meaning of certain Policy terms. The language is explicit and clear, the Rzr is covered as equipment. Courts may not force an ambiguity in order to resolve it against the insurer.
Based on the undisputed Policy language and declarations, the Rzr was equipment, not a covered auto at the time of the accident. Therefore, Plaintiff does not have a duty to defend or indemnify Defendant Pierce or PVRC in the Underlying Action.
Plaintiff Acuity's Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 56 was granted.
ZALMA OPINION
If the plaintiff's wanted the Rzr ATV to be considered a covered auto they only needed to ask Acuity to insure it as such not as "equipment." Since the plaintiff intended to insure the ATV as equipment accidents causing injury due to the operation of the Rzr there was no coverage for defense or indemnity under the auto liability insurance.
(
c) 2025 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.
Please tell your friends and colleagues about this blog and the videos and let them subscribe to the blog and the videos.
Subscribe to my substack at https://barryzalma.substack.com/subscribe
Go to X @bzalma; Go to Barry Zalma videos at Rumble.com at https://rumble.com/account/content?type=all; Go to Barry Zalma on YouTube- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCysiZklEtxZsSF9DfC0Expg; Go to the InsuranceClaims Library – https://lnkd.in/gwEYk.
-
7:47
Insurance Law
26 days agoInsured Can't Assign Bad Faith Claim
291 -
LIVE
LFA TV
19 hours agoLIVE & BREAKING NEWS! | MONDAY 11/3/25
2,870 watching -
1:31:18
Graham Allen
5 hours agoErika Fights Back: Vows To EXPOSE TRUTH & DEMANDS Trial Goes Public!! Left Says Her Grief Is FAKE!
130K80 -
2:08:47
Badlands Media
9 hours agoBadlands Daily: November 3, 2025 – Tariff Wars, SNAP Panic & Brennan Gets Confronted
53.9K15 -
2:59:32
Wendy Bell Radio
8 hours agoThings Will Get Worse Before They Get Better
78K106 -
1:18:28
The Big Mig™
5 hours agoICE Will Use Private Bounty Hunters, LFG
20.1K13 -
1:08:17
Chad Prather
11 hours agoHow to Get Along With People You Don’t Even Like (Most of the Time)
113K33 -
1:45:29
MTNTOUGH Podcast w/ Dustin Diefenderfer
11 hours agoTaya + Colton Kyle: Can American Marriages Survive 2025? | MTNPOD #140
26.2K -
1:12:23
MikeMac - Say Something
19 hours agoSay Something Beyond W/MikeMac: JOKER - Ep.12
25.6K1 -
1:30:13
Game On!
17 hours ago $10.53 earnedChiefs Dynasty OVER, New Longest FG RECORD, and Patriots Are Winning The Super Bowl!
45.2K4