Gavin Newsom’s Manipulation FAIL Against JD Vance — Daily Persuasion with Joshua Lisec Ep. 324

Would you like to write a persuasive BOOK? One that changes minds and influencers behavior for years to come? Start with a GOLDEN book idea. Let NEW YORK TIMES bestselling author Joshua Lisec teach you: https://lisecghostwriting.com/golden

ABOUT TODAY'S EPISODE:

What happens when a politician tries to copy someone else’s style—and ends up looking like a cover band instead of a headliner?

In Daily Persuasion with Joshua Lisec Ep. 324: Gavin Newsom’s Manipulation FAIL Against JD Vance, Lisec dives deep into why Gavin Newsom’s attempt to imitate JD Vance fell flat, and what it teaches us about political communication strategy.

The episode unpacks how Gavin Newsom tried to build rapport with his audience by using recycled lines and watered-down insults. Instead of sounding authentic, he sounded like a parody. As Lisec explains, how politicians build rapport depends on originality, timing, and alignment with the audience’s language. When Newsom tried to borrow from Trump JD Vance 2025 rhetoric, he missed the mark because he wasn’t speaking the way his audience actually talks.

Lisec highlights moments when vp JD Vance nailed his messaging. From the now-iconic “I don’t really care, Margaret” line to the blunt dismissal of criticism about taking out drug cartel boats, Vance connects with his base by echoing their exact words and sentiments. He doesn’t filter. He doesn’t water down. He channels the raw authenticity of his audience. That’s why it works—and why Gavin Newsom’s Manipulation FAIL was so obvious.

This episode is more than just political commentary on Gavin Newsom vs JD Vance. It’s a masterclass in persuasion techniques. Lisec shows how persuasion psychology plays out in real time when politicians use or misuse language. The key lesson: if you want to know how to persuade someone to do something, don’t mimic your opponent—mirror your supporters.

Lisec breaks down several persuasion examples from recent political debates and interviews, showing how Vance leverages authenticity while Newsom relies on borrowed lines. He compares this to examples of persuasion in advertising, where knockoff brands fail because they sound like cheap copies instead of confident originals. In the same way, Newsom’s rhetoric came across as secondhand.

Throughout Ep. 324, Lisec ties these observations to persuasive techniques that apply far beyond politics. Whether you’re writing speeches, selling products, or creating content, the principle is the same: originality wins. Copying your competition only exposes your lack of connection with your audience. Lisec even compares this to techniques of persuasion in writing, where echoing a reader’s thoughts is powerful—but lifting someone else’s phrasing is weak.

Key takeaways from Daily Persuasion Ep. 324: Gavin Newsom’s Manipulation FAIL Against JD Vance include:
• Why Gavin Newsom’s approach to political rhetoric backfired.
• How JD Vance and Donald Trump build rapport by speaking like their audience.
• The importance of listening before you speak—whether in politics, sales, or leadership.
• How to apply persuasion techniques to your own communication without sounding fake.
• Why authenticity beats imitation in every arena.

Lisec also explores the deeper implications for the 2025 political landscape. With Trump JD Vance 2025 on the horizon, politicians who fail to resonate with their base risk being overshadowed by those who do. And as this episode shows, failing at persuasion isn’t just embarrassing—it’s politically costly.

By the end of this episode, you’ll see exactly why Gavin Newsom’s Manipulation FAIL is more than a gaffe—it’s a blueprint for what not to do. And you’ll understand how Lisec uses Daily Persuasion to turn political missteps into universal lessons in communication.

Watch now to learn how not to sound like the cover band—and how to connect with your audience the way JD Vance does.