GLASS VS BAMBOO🎍: INVULNERABILITY AND THE PRACTICE OF RESILIENCE

These sources collectively present an argument contrasting the creation of identity built on **invulnerability** against one rooted in **resilience**. All texts agree that an identity predicated on invulnerability—the denial of weakness and suppression of emotion—paradoxically leads to **rigidity, isolation, and fragility** under pressure. In contrast, the sources define resilience as the **adaptive capacity to absorb change,** embrace vulnerability, and grow through adversity, highlighting its sustainability and authentic nature. The distinction is frequently summarized using symbolic contrasts, such as invulnerability being a **brittle fortress or glass**, while resilience is a **flexible tree or bamboo**, emphasizing that true strength lies in the ability to bend rather than break.