CITIZENSHIP OBSESSION (Citizen v. National) DEBUNKED!!!

22 days ago
273

In this video, UnderstandContractLawAndYouWin.com (UCL) debunks the idea that "all you have to do is change your nationality from a CITIZEN to a National, and you have a different status under the law and can't be prosecuted". This is simply not true, as Citizenship is only ONE factor out of many, in the test of claims of jurisdiction and immunity.

What you'll learn in this presentation, from the study of the ENTIRE JURISPRUDENCE of issues on Citizenship and Nationality:
1. NATIONALS can also be Indicted. Citizenship is NOT the determining factor for immunity from laws.
2. You'll learn the difference between General and Specific Jurisdiction
3. What cases defined the term "minimum contacts"?
4. Physical presence in the United States - what does it mean? A very important Justice Scalia opinion that still stands
5. Cases discussed: Helicopteros Nacionales de Colombia v. Hall, Perkins v. Benguet Mining Co., Burnham v. Superior Court of California,
6. The Zippo test
7. Jurisdiction and Commercial Activity - yours and the State's (both scenarios)
8. In rem, subject-matter, and in personam jurisdiction
9. Different kinds of Immunity - Special, Witness, Use, Transactional/blanket/total, Diplomatic, General, State, and Sovereign Immunity

UCL has debunked over 85 theories, and back up all claims with real world examples of WINS and FAILS in real world court scenarios. There are some things that do work, but 90%+ of the info on the internet is incorrect. Get with a real team to help you sift through and analyze every idea for the golden nuggets. Don't expriment on yourself, and hold onto the proper techniques near and dear to your heart...

Check out our EDU Courses and Empower Yourself Pack:
https://understandcontractlawandyouwin.com/edu-courses/

Loading 2 comments...