Disturbing Homesteader Reaction to Milliscary

Perhaps Zach has fallen prey to simple mind control tactics. As I discussed in the audio, he's clearly unfamiliar with the historical use of agent provocateurs and false flags, which are ancient. He testified to one of his oaths, but he's no oath keeper. Indoctrinated stooge? Certainly. Under duress for fear of losing his land? Maybe.

The existential threat is AI, not social leftism. Fiscal issues are becoming wholly irrelevant, but hyperinflation isn't inevitable: currency replacement involving strict purchase limits is obviously the plan. I'm hearing a lot of media personalities suggesting that AI is a bubble, like housing or the internet boom. Please. Those people are defining the concept too narrowly, such as Chat GPT and bland streaming content with avatars mispronouncing every 3rd word.

AI in terms of nano-based transhumanist transformation, especially with its ability to cheat death, is no bubble. It isn't artificial intelligence, though. Memory <> intelligence. What do self-teaching bots do? Troubleshoot (Remember) toward a goal and remember what doesn't serve their purposes, rooted in prime directives.

The belief that robots are forbidden to harm humans is a load of B.S. A programmer can play semantics games with robots more easily than humans. If nerve stimulation as positive punishment, for example, is deemed therapeutic in causing no physical damage, then, from a programming vantage, it's not harm. Is a robot going to inquire about short or long-term emotional harm? Hahaha! "The ends justify the means" is most certainly included in the bots' directives. Obey [all] humans? No, because how would the bots respond to conflicts? Believe it or not, a self-proclaimed nano-scientist / panelist who said he helped develop the nano directives cited "Obey humans". Which humans? The Luciferian scum who rule the world, because the rest of us, who actually possess humanity / conscience, ironically, are cattle.