Killing Farmers to Please WHO & UN? We Offered Real Solutions — They Said No Part 5

Part 5

Transcript:
As long as we have birds in the sky, we will always have each other.

So what are we going to do?
Are we going to kill all of our animals — all of our livestock — wipe out our small farmers across Canada just to appease a non-elected governing body that’s been influencing Canada for the past seven years: the World Health Organization, taking directives from the UN?

Or are we going to protect our own country?

Right now, we’re letting these non-elected directives control and ruin our industries.
They show no consideration or respect for what we’re losing as a nation.

And I keep saying:

This is about our children.
This is about our grandchildren.
This is about protecting animals that live outdoors.

They’ve made it very clear in their management conferences that “all animals outdoors are at risk because they’re exposed to migratory birds.”

What does that tell you?
It means your dog, your cat, your cow, your pig — none of them are safe anymore… because we have birds.

We even came up with a solution.
We’ve been working with Japan’s leading scientists — incredible minds doing groundbreaking work with ostrich antibodies. His science is being used right now in Japan.

We proposed using our ostrich antibodies to develop a fogging machine that could safely treat migratory birds — boosting their natural immunity instead of spreading fear and destruction.

We even suggested filtration systems for barns — real, practical solutions that could help in a crisis.

But we were met with resistance at every step.

For 10 months we’ve been punished and blocked, despite our willingness to collaborate.

In the past, Canada worked closely with the U.S., the FDA, and the NIH.
But now, when the next threat arises, they refuse to work together.
There’s no common sense. Something doesn’t smell right.

We even had to fight for something as basic as where to send the remains.
In November, we begged the local landfill board not to take a contract that would force them to accept the bodies of our birds.

We pleaded with them:

“These animals are over 35 years old.
They’ve lived long, healthy lives.
Test them first to prove they’re sick before putting them in your landfill — don’t just assume they’re infected.”

Thankfully, the RGCK District boundaries voted unanimously not to accept the birds without Canadian-agency testing to prove the virus actually existed in the animals.

That was a major win for us.