Premium Only Content
Supreme Court Case Could END Democrats Forever
Supreme Court Case Could END Democrats Forever
The Supreme Court is hearing Louisiana v. Callais this week, a case that could upend American politics overnight. Since 1986, Democrats have used Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act to draw majority-minority districts through racial gerrymandering, gaining an estimated 30-seat edge in the House. Now, the conservative Court is questioning whether these race-based maps violate the 14th and 15th Amendments. A ruling against gerrymandering could hand Republicans 17–30 seats instantly. We explain how Democrats weaponized civil rights law into a political cheat code, why the Left is panicking, and what this means for Congress. With Trump’s Supreme Court picks and redistricting in GOP states, the stage is set for a historic shift in power.
#trump #news #supremecourt
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*DISCLAIMER*
Proceed with caution: You're about to experience the wild musings of a certified nutcase. Designed purely for entertainment purposes, chuckles and grins, the views expressed in this video are solely those of a man whose love for sarcasm is only outmatched by his inability to pass up a good Philly cheesesteak.
The content on this channel may cause sudden bouts of laughter, eye-rolling, or, in extreme cases, enlightenment. You listen at your own risk, especially if you are prone to missing jokes or allergic to different opinions.
You've been warned.
---------------------------------------
This video may include copyrighted material used for educational and informational purposes, such as parody, commentary, and criticism. Such use is protected under the “fair use” doctrine outlined in Section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law. Relevant case law includes Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F. Supp. 3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017), Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. (510 U.S. 569, 1994), Equals Three, Kelly v. Arriba-Soft (336 F.3d 811, 9th Cir. 2003), LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015), and Fisher v. Dees (794 F.2d 432, 9th Cir. 1986), and others.
© 2025 Copyright Jabberhouse Media, LLC, DBA RPW Media
-
3:07:55
RPWMedia
1 day agoLIVE: 12/12/2025 No-Spin Conservative News Breakdown | RPW Media
22 -
RealMetatron
4 hours agoGaming and React Night
20.2K3 -
1:44:37
RiftTV
5 hours agoIs It OKAY to be WHITE? Elon Musk Controversy ERUPTS! | Guest: Postman | SLIGHTLY OFFENSIVE
16.7K7 -
2:16:50
BlackDiamondGunsandGear
5 hours agoAfter Hours Armory / Are we getting Sued?
18.7K -
6:42:01
SpartakusLIVE
8 hours agoSaturday SPARTOONS || NEW Mode - AMPED w/ Grapplehooks! ARC Later?!
113K4 -
12:07
GBGunsRumble
9 hours agoGBGuns Range Report 13DEC25
17.5K1 -
8:19
Hollywood Exposed
8 hours agoBill Maher Destroys AOC And Bernie Over Their Socialist Agenda
13.8K7 -
2:16:50
DLDAfterDark
5 hours ago $3.67 earnedClash Of Conservatives! Dan Crenshaw Vs. Shawn Ryan - Who's Side Are You On? Why? And Gun Talk
19.3K2 -
2:31:09
Quite Frankly
8 hours agoSaturday Night Christmas Lounge | Quite Frankly
90.8K15 -
41:27
The Why Files
10 days agoThey Walk Among Us | The Human-Alien Hybrid Program
86.2K76