Premium Only Content
Supreme Court Case Could END Democrats Forever
Supreme Court Case Could END Democrats Forever
The Supreme Court is hearing Louisiana v. Callais this week, a case that could upend American politics overnight. Since 1986, Democrats have used Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act to draw majority-minority districts through racial gerrymandering, gaining an estimated 30-seat edge in the House. Now, the conservative Court is questioning whether these race-based maps violate the 14th and 15th Amendments. A ruling against gerrymandering could hand Republicans 17–30 seats instantly. We explain how Democrats weaponized civil rights law into a political cheat code, why the Left is panicking, and what this means for Congress. With Trump’s Supreme Court picks and redistricting in GOP states, the stage is set for a historic shift in power.
#trump #news #supremecourt
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*DISCLAIMER*
Proceed with caution: You're about to experience the wild musings of a certified nutcase. Designed purely for entertainment purposes, chuckles and grins, the views expressed in this video are solely those of a man whose love for sarcasm is only outmatched by his inability to pass up a good Philly cheesesteak.
The content on this channel may cause sudden bouts of laughter, eye-rolling, or, in extreme cases, enlightenment. You listen at your own risk, especially if you are prone to missing jokes or allergic to different opinions.
You've been warned.
---------------------------------------
This video may include copyrighted material used for educational and informational purposes, such as parody, commentary, and criticism. Such use is protected under the “fair use” doctrine outlined in Section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law. Relevant case law includes Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F. Supp. 3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017), Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. (510 U.S. 569, 1994), Equals Three, Kelly v. Arriba-Soft (336 F.3d 811, 9th Cir. 2003), LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015), and Fisher v. Dees (794 F.2d 432, 9th Cir. 1986), and others.
© 2025 Copyright Jabberhouse Media, LLC, DBA RPW Media
-
7:05
RPWMedia
7 days agoNew California Agenda Could DESTROY the State
16 -
1:31:09
Amy Dangerfield
2 hours ago $0.02 earnedJames Fishback at Seed to Table Naples Florida @jamesfishback
71 -
10:24
Clyde Do Something
7 hours ago $0.02 earnedPresident Trump EXPOSES Carney’s Plan to Sell Canada to CHINA
1622 -
LIVE
Flyover Conservatives
10 hours agoDR. BRYAN ARDIS | Newborn Babies. Monsanto. Transgenderism. What’s the Connection? You’re NOT Going to Believe it! | FOC Show
204 watching -
25:42
Jasmin Laine
2 hours agoFox News Panel ROASTS Mark Carney Over China Deal—“Canada Is Detached From Reality”
39512 -
18:20
Connor Tomlinson
7 hours agoWas George Orwell an Ethnonationalist?
135 -
LIVE
Sarah Westall
2 hours agoEpstein Was the Front to Something Bigger | Cathy O’Brien
219 watching -
LIVE
SpartakusLIVE
3 hours agoGames w/ Rall || #1 Spartan and Dragon DYNAMIC Duo
435 watching -
LIVE
megimu32
1 hour agoON THE SUBJECT: 2000s Things That Don’t Exist Anymore 👽
95 watching -
LIVE
CHiLi's Dojo
30 minutes agoTekken 8 | Fahk & Rank
34 watching