Premium Only Content
Supreme Court Case Could END Democrats Forever
Supreme Court Case Could END Democrats Forever
The Supreme Court is hearing Louisiana v. Callais this week, a case that could upend American politics overnight. Since 1986, Democrats have used Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act to draw majority-minority districts through racial gerrymandering, gaining an estimated 30-seat edge in the House. Now, the conservative Court is questioning whether these race-based maps violate the 14th and 15th Amendments. A ruling against gerrymandering could hand Republicans 17–30 seats instantly. We explain how Democrats weaponized civil rights law into a political cheat code, why the Left is panicking, and what this means for Congress. With Trump’s Supreme Court picks and redistricting in GOP states, the stage is set for a historic shift in power.
#trump #news #supremecourt
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*DISCLAIMER*
Proceed with caution: You're about to experience the wild musings of a certified nutcase. Designed purely for entertainment purposes, chuckles and grins, the views expressed in this video are solely those of a man whose love for sarcasm is only outmatched by his inability to pass up a good Philly cheesesteak.
The content on this channel may cause sudden bouts of laughter, eye-rolling, or, in extreme cases, enlightenment. You listen at your own risk, especially if you are prone to missing jokes or allergic to different opinions.
You've been warned.
---------------------------------------
This video may include copyrighted material used for educational and informational purposes, such as parody, commentary, and criticism. Such use is protected under the “fair use” doctrine outlined in Section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law. Relevant case law includes Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F. Supp. 3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017), Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. (510 U.S. 569, 1994), Equals Three, Kelly v. Arriba-Soft (336 F.3d 811, 9th Cir. 2003), LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015), and Fisher v. Dees (794 F.2d 432, 9th Cir. 1986), and others.
© 2025 Copyright Jabberhouse Media, LLC, DBA RPW Media
-
8:51
RPWMedia
3 days agoTrump Wins Big in Georgia and Sends Fani Willis a Bill
211 -
LIVE
Drew Hernandez
23 hours agoTYLER ROBINSON APPEARS IN COURT IN PERSON LAUGHING?
1,114 watching -
24:17
Robbi On The Record
3 hours ago $0.34 earnedDating Apps and Period Apps Are Playing the Same Game | ft Cybersecurity Girl
8.25K5 -
59:39
efenigson
1 day agoCash Controls, App-Store Censorship & the Battle for Privacy - Lea Petrasova | Ep. 110
13K -
2:47:01
Laura Loomer
5 hours agoEP161: Oh Brother! Ilhan Under Investigation For Immigration Fraud??
24.7K4 -
2:38:47
TimcastIRL
5 hours agoErika Kirk Tells Candace Owens STOP, Candace Says NO | Timcast IRL
324K197 -
3:22:59
Alex Zedra
4 hours agoLIVE! New Game | Cursed Companions
27.7K3 -
52:12
T-SPLY
4 hours agoMembers of Congress MELTDOWN Over Federal Agents and Arrests!
25.4K18 -
2:45:28
Barry Cunningham
7 hours agoLIVE BREAKING NEWS: President Trump Speech at the Congressional Ball | AlphaWarrior Interview
47.4K36 -
LIVE
DLDAfterDark
4 hours ago $0.73 earnedDan Crenshaw Suing Shawn Ryan - Gun Talk With A Stranger - 300BLK VS 556 for PDW
336 watching