Austrian Analysis of 4 Million Shows 4 Doses Mean 7.3x the Infection Risk of the Unvaccinated

What If the Core Promise of mRNA Vaccines Was Backwards? An Austrian Analysis of 4 Million Shows 4 Doses Mean 7.3x the Infection Risk of the Unvaccinated.

The foundation of global mRNA vaccine policy is cracking. A major observational study—tracking four million Austrians over eight months—has produced a finding that demands a fundamental rethink of the official narrative.

The core promise was that vaccination would reduce transmission and infection. The Austrian data reveals the opposite: individuals who received four doses were 7.3 times more likely to become infected than their unvaccinated counterparts.

This is not a minor anomaly. As public health specialist Dr. Alberto Donzelli argues, this real-world evidence aligns with two alarming global trends: a collapse in public trust and a rise in all-cause mortality that can no longer be ignored.

Why is this reality not dominating headlines? The truth is being obscured because critical data is withheld. Accurate analysis depends on two conditions that authorities consistently avoid:

1. Transparency: Governments must publish all-cause mortality data stratified by vaccination status. Instead, this data is rarely released and often discontinued when questions arise.

2. Rigorous Science: The four principal systematic errors in epidemiology must be corrected for, not ignored, to get a true signal from the noise.

The Austrian study is a beacon, illuminating a path away from flawed models and toward honest science. It confirms that the prevailing public health message was not just optimistic—it was dangerously incorrect.

The movement for medical integrity is no longer just questioning the narrative; it is providing the data that shatters it.