Public AFFIDAVIT OF DECLARATION NOTICE Systematic Corruption and Judicial Injustice in Pennsylvania

Public Silence Is The Real Threat.. THE IMPACT OF FALSE ACCUSATIONS ON INDIVIDUALS:

Innocent person are winding up with significant effects on his/her life, including, having to change his or her daily activities, Having this allegations & restraining order on file on an innocent person’s reputation and implicate him or her in future crimes simply because this perceived violent record, In fact under, Mr. Mouratidis's case & inter alia. Damages to Character & Reputation: Loss of Subsidized Housing, Loss of Professional employments. Loss of Professional employment after proper schooling for a career, Upon, false judgments, false civil injunction, depriving persons civil rights, psychological emotional abuse, intentional inflection of emotional abuse loss of opportune of potential employment.

The physical facts of one who’s lost in the world of outside social order.
​
a) Its about having a chance,
​
b) Its about having trained in schools for career opportunities[s], not a dead end job!!!
​
c) Its about the self respect that comes w/ a paycheck,

d) For a career that pays real wages & yes, that is what where all about,
​
e) Its about feeding ones own, independent, w/money that is earned after a future of your choosing,
​
f) The full loss of human social activities,
​
g) The loss of human life as a hole.

Michael R. Durr, Denied all Pa. Const. Art. 1. Sec. 9.

Full Defense: A Right to & for an Unimpeded Criminal Defense:
ReFilig under Pa.Cost.Art.1. Sec. 9..6th Amend: U.S.C.A.

COMMONWEALTH EVIDENCE OR LACK THERE OF
COMPONENT LEGAL REMEDIES TO CHALLENGE THE STATE'S EVIDENCE
FOLLOWING BY COMPETENT *IN PRO PER* DEF. LEGAL DEFENSE’S WHICH

NO BAR MEMBER CAN EXECUTE COMPLETELY BY COMPETENT *IN PRO PER* DEF.

Man Michael Durr, Def. in pro per, RIGHTS TO A FULL UNIMPEDED
CRIMINAL DEFENCE

PA.CONST. ART. 1. SEC. 9.
SIXTH AMEND: U.S.C.A.
Ferrata vs. calf. 95 s.ct. 2525

EVEN W/IN PA.R CRIM.P. R. 121 COMMENT TO RULE

Pa.R.Crim.P.R.101(B):... rules secure, fair & elimination of unjustifiable delay,

Pa.R.Crim.P.R.101(A):... determination criminal proceeding,

Pa.R.Crim.P.R.121(A):.... waive counsel> 95 S.Ct 2525,

Pa.R.Crim.P.R.116:....... judicial districts in compliance w/Pa.R.Crim.P

Pa.R.Crim.P.R.570:....... pretrial conference,

Pa.R.Crim.P.R.570(A)(2):. factual admissibility of Ev

Pa.R.Crim.P.R.570(A)(3):. qualification, as evidence to avoid delay,

Pa.R.Crim.P.R.570(A)(6):. disposition of proceeding,

Pa.R.Crim.P.R.570 comment (a)(2): time & place of corpus delicti,

Pa.R.Crim.P.R.570(A)(3):. qualifying, pictures, documents, records.

Pa.R.Crim.P.R.570(A)(9):. suppression,

Pa.R.Crim.P.R.573(D):.... compel.

Pa.R.Crim.P.R.581:........ suppress, failure to file w/in time waiver,

Pa.R.Crim.P.R.586(1):..... demur, public interest,

Pa.R.Crim.P.R.586(2):..... demur, R.507 violation DR 7-103(a).

Pa.R.Crim.P.R.578(3):..... omnibus pretrial, suppression of Ev.

Pa.R.Crim.P.R.578:........ omnibus pretrial, motion in limine

Pa.R.Crim.P.R.578:....... earliest submission on motions encouraged.

Pa.R.Crim.P.R.587(a):.... demur, interest of justice,

Pa.R.Crim.P.R.575:........ motions & answers,

Pa.R.Crim.P.R.576(2)(b):.. filing & service,

Pa.R.A.P. R.1542:......... evidentiary hearing,

Pa.R.A.P. R.1513:.......... petition for review, 2 petitions for review,

Pa.R.A.P. R.902, 903, 905:. notice of appeal.

Whenever any officer of the court commits fraud during a proceeding in the court, he/she is engaged in "fraud upon the court. "In Bulloch v. United States, 763 F.2d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir. 1985), the court stated "Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury. ... It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is attempted or where the judge has not performed his/her judicial function ---
thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted."

"Fraud upon the court" has been defined by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals to "embrace that species of fraud which does, or attempts to, defile the court itself, or is a fraud perpetrated by officers of the court so that the judicial machinery can not perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented for adjudication." Kenner v. C.I.R., 387 F.3d 689 (1968); 7 Moore's Federal Practice, 2d ed., p. 512, ¶ 60.23. The 7th Circuit further stated "a decision produced by fraud upon the court is not in essence a decision at all, and never becomes final."

Fraud Upon the Court........ is where the Judge (who is NOT the "Court") does NOT support or uphold the Judicial Machinery of the Court. The Court is an unbiased, but methodical "creature" which is governed by the Rule of Law... that is, the Rules of Civil Procedure, the Rules of Criminal Procedure and the Rules of Evidence,........ all which is overseen by Constitutional law. The Court can ONLY be effective, fair and "just" if it is allowed to function as the laws proscribe. The sad fact is that in MOST Courts across the country, from Federal Courts down to local District courts, have judges who are violating their oath of office and are NOT properly following these rules,
(as most judges, do NOT as well & are usually grossly ignorant of the rules judges, are playing a revised legal game w/their own created rules) and THIS is a Fraud upon the Court, immediately removing jurisdiction from that Court, and vitiates (makes ineffective - invalidates) every decision from that point on. Any judge who does such a thing is under mandatory, non discretionary duty to recuse himself or herself from the case, and this rarely happens unless someone can force them to do so with the evidence of violations of procedure and threat of losing half their pensions for life which is what can take place.