The Daily Breakdown: "Infighting" on the right

Infighting within a political party or social movement is often seen as a sign of weakness, but under certain circumstances, it can serve a constructive purpose. When a party experiences internal conflict, it can bring existing tensions, problematic behaviors, and ideological inconsistencies to the surface. This process can ultimately help a movement identify and remove bad actors who are undermining its credibility or goals.

Here’s why infighting can sometimes be beneficial:

Exposes Hidden Problems: Internal disputes often reveal corruption, incompetence, or hypocrisy that might otherwise remain concealed. When these issues are aired, the movement can take steps toward accountability.
Clarifies Principles and Goals: Internal debates force members to articulate their core values and priorities. This can make it clear which individuals are acting in bad faith or are misaligned with the movement’s mission.
Strengthens Long-Term Credibility: By confronting and removing bad actors, a party demonstrates a commitment to integrity. This can strengthen its reputation both internally and with the public.
Promotes Healthy Leadership Change: Infighting sometimes clears the path for new leaders who are more effective, ethical, or better aligned with the movement’s principles.

While infighting must be managed carefully to avoid weakening the party’s overall unity, in the long term, these conflicts can serve as a form of self-correction that purges the movement of elements that could harm it from within

show notes:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2025/oct/27/hurricane-melissa-jamaica-cuba-caribbean-haiti-dominican-republic-live-news-latest-updates

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/federal-workers-brace-missed-paycheck-shutdown-enters-5th-week

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/oct/27/javier-milei-president-far-right-party-wins-argentina-midterm-elections