Why did HILLARY CLINTON and her State Department intervene

Why did HILLARY CLINTON and her State Department intervene to protect officials routinely soliciting SEXUAL ACTIVITIES with CHILDREN?

They only acknowledged it after insiders called them out for covering it up and when the story got attention.

Why do crimes against children always seem to revolve around the same group of people? After awhile, you can't deny the repetitive patterns.

The ambassador who came under investigation "routinely ditched his protective security detail in order to solicit sexual favors from both prostitutes and minor children," according to documents obtained by NBC News.

The alleged misconduct took place during former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s tenure, which also say those activities may not have been properly looked into to purposely protect select individuals from prosecution.

Top state department officials directed investigators to "cease the investigation" into the ambassador’s conduct, according to the memo.

A state department spokesperson would not confirm the specific investigations, but told NBC News "the notion that we would not vigorously pursue criminal misconduct in a case, in any case, is preposterous." Even though they did cover it up until someone blew the whistle on them.

"The notion that any or all of the cases contained in news reports would not be investigated thoroughly by the department is unthinkable."

But not until they got caught protecting the individuals first, then they "do their job." So would they have even done anything if they didn't get caught protecting them and if the story didn't get any attention?

How many more cases, lies, corruption, and crimes are there that these people have gotten away with?

These types of crimes, especially involving children, always seem to happen and involve the same players. The patterns don't lie, people do. Pay attention.

Join: @JudyByingtonQ (https://t.me/judybyington_q)