They are coming..

Original by @AsmonTV : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFxQ03dlrvI

Support me ♥ https://www.patreon.com/leaflit
Watch me ♥ https://www.twitch.tv/Leaflit
Kick me ♥ https://www.kick.com/Leaflit
Follow me ♥ https://twitter.com/LeaflitVT
See me ♥ https://www.tiktok.com/@leaflitvt
Discord ♥ https://discord.com/invite/leaflit
TTRPG ♥ https://rpg.angelssword.com/
MERCH ♥ https://shop.angelssword.com/

I just watched Asmongold’s video “The internet was not lying about this…” and one part stood out: a woman on social media saying she’ll go into a store, grab up whatever she wants, and walk out without paying — if her SNAP benefits are cut. In this reaction, I’m calling that out. Threats of theft and intimidation aren’t a legitimate way to respond to policy. They undermine the conversation, the system, and the people we should actually be helping.

Threatening theft is not protected protest—it’s coercion. “If my benefits stop I’ll just steal from the store” isn’t a statement of hardship, it’s a threat. That kind of language shifts the system from dialogue to intimidation.
Retailers and innocent consumers get caught in the crossfire. The result: higher prices, more security, less trust, stores closing, people fired, less jobs
If you believe benefits are being cut unfairly, you undermine your argument when you threaten theft. Policy change happens through advocacy, voting, the courts—not looting.
The posts saying “we’ll walk out with carts and not pay” provide ammunition to critics who say welfare recipients are irresponsible—which may hurt those genuinely in need.
Stores facing threats may raise prices, reduce services, or need more policing—all of which can affect low-income communities the most.
Taxpayers who fund SNAP expect the system to work—not be associated with violence or theft. Threats reduce goodwill.

In this video I discuss SNAP benefits threats theft posts, reaction to social-media looting threats if food-stamps cut, Asmongold reaction video SNAP controversy, why theft threats over public assistance are dangerous, supporting reform but rejecting intimidation tactics, retailers lock down after SNAP looting threats, Leaflit reacts to SNAP cut threats conversation, public-policy debate vs mob-threats welfare, food-stamps cuts 2025 controversy, taxpayer fairness and threat rhetoric welfare debate, Leaflit reacts, SNAP cut threats, food stamps looting threat, Asmongold SNAP reaction, theft threats welfare cuts, reaction video SNAP controversy, public assistance reform, retail looting threats, taxpayer fairness welfare debate, welfare threat rhetoric

If you are the owner of the original video and you want this video removed, please contact: [email protected]

#gaming #vtuber #reaction