BBC had targeted Donald Trump with the same playbook they've using it against China

Video with English Subtitles: It's revealing to see US media outlets and the BBC had targeted Donald Trump with the same playbook they've using it against China for 40+ years: propaganda and fake news. 影片有英文字幕: 看到美國媒體與 BBC 如今以過去四十多年對付中國的同一套手法, 宣傳假新聞, 來針對川普，實在耐人尋味.

The effectiveness of this is personal. Despite my decades of experience in Asia and an award from President Bush in 2008 at the White House East Room for my work in China helping US companies, my own children dismiss my views, believing media narratives over my firsthand knowledge. The success of this misinformation in erasing legitimate expertise is not just a societal problem, it's a profound personal insult.

Trump sued the BBC for at least US$1 billion, provoking the wrong person by faking the news.

The BBC, known as the global benchmark, resigned within one day! This is not an honorable retirement, but a "resignation" forced into a corner by Trump!

All of this stems from an internally leaked "editing memorandum" that thoroughly exposed how the BBC used malicious editing to remove the keywords "peaceful and patriotic" to frame Trump's shocking scam of inciting riots on Capitol Hill.

Just the day after the executive resigned, Wang Mingwang filed a "billion-dollar" lawsuit, directly pushing the century-old BBC house to the brink of collapse. This is not just about a lawsuit, but also about:

Significance to the world: How Trump's philosophy of "using evil to control evil" tore open the last fig leaf of Western media's "objective neutrality" and exposed the ironic reality of European and American public broadcasters transforming into "Ministry of Truth".

What it means to us: In the face of those international rogue media who are accustomed to "replacing flowers and taking them out of context", our counterattack must not stop at verbal condemnation! Trump's ruthlessness proves that "tit-for-tat" is the only justice to curb malice.

Will the BBC admit compensation, or will it stick to the end? This "media vs. president" confrontation is the cruelest survival rule in the post-truth era.

看到美國媒體與 BBC 如今以過去四十年對付中國的同一套手法, 宣傳與假新聞, 來針對川普，實在耐人尋味。

這件事對我而言更是切身的。儘管我在亞洲有數十年的經驗，並曾因工作在 2008 年於白宮東廳獲得布希總統頒發的獎項，表彰我幫助美國公司在中國開展業務, 但可惜連我自己的孩子都否定我的工作和看法, 寧願相信媒體敘事，也不願相信我的親身知識。這種錯誤資訊能抹煞真正專業的現象，不僅是社會問題，更是深深對父親的個人侮辱。

川普向 BBC 提出至少 10 億美元的訴訟，因為 BBC 以造假新聞的方式得罪了不該得罪的人。

被視為全球標杆的 BBC，竟在一天內宣布高層辭職！這並不是光榮退休，而是被川普逼到牆角的“被迫下台”！

而這一切，源自一份內部外流的「剪輯備忘錄」。這份文件徹底揭露 BBC 如何惡意剪輯、刪掉「和平、愛國」等關鍵字，將川普栽贓為煽動國會山暴動的驚天騙局。

就在高層辭職的隔天，王明旺遞交了一份「十億美元級」的訴狀，直接把這家百年 BBC 推向崩潰邊緣。這不僅是一場訴訟，更代表著：

對世界的意義： 川普以「以惡制惡」的方式，撕開了西方媒體「客觀中立」最後的遮羞布，暴露出歐美公共媒體淪為「真理部」的諷刺現實。

對我們的啟示： 面對那些慣於「移花接木、斷章取義」的國際流氓媒體，我們的反擊不能只停留在口頭譴責！川普的手段證明，「以牙還牙」才是遏制惡意的唯一正義。

BBC 會選擇認賠，還是抗到底？這場「媒體 vs. 總統」的對決，是後真相時代最殘酷的生存法則。