The Fair Use Right We Can't Get Wrong!

6 hours ago
2

Thomson Reuters v. Ross is quietly becoming one of the most important fair use battles happening right now. And despite what you've seen flying around online, no, it's not a case about generative AI.

In this video, we break down why the district court got it wrong, what the ten(!) new amicus briefs are saying, and why the Third Circuit appeal matters for the future of not only AI development, but for legal research and public access to the law.

We either move in the direction of fair use and open access, or secret courts and fascist authoritarianism.

Diverse Amici Support ROSS at the Third Circuit - Disruptive Competition Project
https://project-disco.org/intellectual-property/diverse-amici-support-ross-at-the-third-circuit/

Free Law Project | Making the legal ecosystem more equitable and competitive https://free.law/

⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯
💬Bᴏɢᴏsɪᴛʏ Dɪꜱᴄᴏʀᴅ: https://discord.bogosity.tv/
💬Lᴏʀᴅ Kɪʟʟɪᴀɴ'ꜱ Dɪꜱᴄᴏʀᴅ: http://bit.ly/LK-Discord
▶️YᴏᴜTᴜʙᴇ: https://www.youtube.com/shanedk
▶️Oᴅʏsᴇᴇ: https://odysee.com/%24/invite/@shanedk:4
▶️Rᴜᴍʙʟᴇ https://rumble.com/c/shanedk
💬Dɪꜱᴄᴏʀᴅ: http://bit.ly/LK-Discord
💰Dᴏɴᴀᴛᴇ ᴏʀ ꜱᴜʙꜱᴄʀɪʙᴇ: https://donate.bogosity.tv

0:00 - Intro
1:21 - Project Disco's Summary of Thomson Reuters Amicus Curiae Briefs
2:22 - Summary of Amici Opinions
3:27 - Can Westlaw Headnotes Even Be Copyrighted?
4:53 - Fair Use Factor 1: The Nature and Character of the Use
6:45 - Factor 2: Nature of the Work
7:29 - Factor 3: Amount and Substantiality of the Portion Used
8:10 - Factor 4: Effect on the Potential Market
10:02 - This Decision Would Also Cut off Access to the Law

Loading 1 comment...