Wikipedia Is Rigged and Anti-Conservative

In this short video, we explore the findings of Professor David Rozado, whose groundbreaking study reveals a deep and measurable political bias embedded in Wikipedia’s content — and how that bias is now infecting the AI systems we rely on.

Rozado conducted a large-scale sentiment analysis of Wikipedia articles covering hundreds of political figures — including U.S. presidents, senators, Supreme Court justices, governors, and journalists. His results were striking:

• Left-leaning figures were consistently described using positive emotional language — words linked to joy, admiration, and trust. • Right-leaning figures were framed with negative sentiment — words tied to anger, disgust, and fear.

The average effect size was 1 standard deviation (Cohen’s d) — a statistically significant skew.

Even more alarming: Rozado found that this bias has percolated into AI models, including large language models like ChatGPT, which are trained in part on Wikipedia’s corpus.

This means that political bias isn’t just shaping public perception — it’s being hardcoded into the algorithms that will define our future.

Subscribe to https://npov.substack.com/ for more in depth reports on the Wikipedia Crisis.

NPOV (Neutral Point of View) is a media outlet and investigative platform dedicated to exposing covert manipulation campaigns that distort the internet’s information infrastructure. NPOV is uncovering corruption inside Wikipedia, search engines, and AI systems — the platforms now responsible for shaping reputations, influencing purchasing decisions, and guiding political discourse.

NPOV was founded in 2025 by investigative journalist Ashley Rindsberg, whose reporting has helped shape global conversations about media integrity, censorship, and narrative warfare.

Subscribe on Substack: https://npov.substack.com/
Follow on X @npovmedia
Follow on Instagram @npovmedia