King James Bible vs the devil's bible

Here’s the straight, documented truth about **Brooke Foss Westcott** (1825–1901) and **Fenton John Anthony Hort** (1828–1892), the two men whose Greek text is the foundation of **EVERY** modern Bible version (NIV, ESV, NASB, NLT, CSB, etc.).

These are not conspiracy theories. These are their own words from their letters, books, and biographies.

### 1. They Rejected the Inerrancy of Scripture
- Hort wrote: “The Bible is in many respects a most confusing book… I am obliged to reject the idea of infallibility or inerrancy in the ordinary sense.”
(Life of Hort, Vol. 1, p. 420–421)

- Westcott said the idea of “verbal inspiration” (every word inspired) was “a dangerous superstition.”

### 2. They Denied a Literal Hell and Eternal Punishment
- Hort: “The notion of eternal torment is a monstrous and intolerable idea… I believe it is a doctrine of demons.”
He openly taught annihilationism or universal salvation.

- Westcott refused to preach on hell and said the idea of eternal punishment was “repulsive.”

### 3. They Questioned the Virgin Birth and Bodily Resurrection
- Hort wrote to a friend: “The virgin birth is a doctrine that I find it hard to accept in the literal sense.”
(Life of Hort, Vol. 2, p. 50)

- Westcott called the bodily resurrection “a stumbling block to many.”

### 4. They Rejected the Blood Atonement of Christ
- Hort: “The popular doctrine of substitutionary atonement is a foul and vulgar conception.”
(He hated the idea that Jesus had to shed literal blood to pay for sin.)

- Westcott called the blood atonement “carnal” and “butcher-work theology.”

### 5. They Were Deep Into the Occult and Anglo-Catholicism
- Both were founding members of secret societies:
- The **Ghostly Guild** (investigating ghosts and the paranormal)
- The **Hermes Club** (esoteric and occult studies)
- Westcott started the **Society for Psychical Research** (studying séances and spiritualism).
- Hort wrote: “I have been a convinced socialist and communist for years.”

### 6. They HATED the King James Bible and the Received Text
- Hort called the Textus Receptus (Greek text behind KJV) “villainous” and “vile.”
- Their entire life’s work was to overthrow it and replace it with two questionable manuscripts (Vaticanus and Sinaiticus) that disagree with each other over 3,000 times in the Gospels alone.

### 7. They Believed in Evolution and Denied Genesis
- Westcott openly taught theistic evolution and called Genesis 1–11 “mythological.”
- Hort said Adam was “not a historical figure.”

### 8. They Believed Mary Should Be Worshipped
- Both were Anglo-Catholics who venerated Mary.
- Westcott wrote prayers to Mary and called her “the Mother of God” in a worship sense.
- Hort said: “Mary worship has its rightful place.”

### Bottom Line (Their Own Words Summarized)
- No literal hell
- No blood atonement
- No inerrant Bible
- No literal virgin birth
- No bodily resurrection
- Yes to evolution
- Yes to occult research
- Yes to praying to Mary

And these are the two men whose Greek text is in **your** modern Bible.

So when people say “it’s just a translation difference,” remind them:
The difference is between two men who loved Jesus and two men who spent their lives trying to undermine everything He taught.

Choose your Bible.
Choose your Jesus.

Drop a ✝️ if you’re staying with the King James.
Support the channel, support the testimony, and stay visible while you walk through the fire.

Get yours right here:
https://my-store-10ca473.creator-spring.com/

Tag @SirSensitivity when you wear it. Let the world know: THAT’S RIGHT.🙏🔥