JEFFRIES IN FULL PANIC MODE!—Epstein Lies CRUMBLE As Dems Expose Themselves

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries is facing significant scrutiny after new documents revealed a 2013 email inviting convicted offender Jeffrey Epstein to a fundraiser tied to Jeffries’ rise in Congress. The email, sent by a consulting firm affiliated with Jeffries, described him as “Brooklyn’s Barack” and indicated efforts to draw Epstein into Democratic fundraising circles. Although there’s no record of Epstein donating to Jeffries or responding to the invitation, the revelation raises questions about transparency, elite influence and the ethics of political fundraising. Meanwhile, Congress voted overwhelmingly to force the Department of Justice to release all files related to Epstein’s case, spotlighting the broader issue of how power and privilege may shield wrongdoing.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries was pressed by reporters three separate times over whether it was appropriate for Stacey Plaskett to exchange messages with convicted offender Jeffrey Epstein during a 2019 congressional hearing, and each time Jeffries refused to provide a straight answer. Documents recently released show that Plaskett allegedly communicated with Epstein while watching the hearing live, raising serious questions about judgment and transparency. The repeated dodges by Jeffries underscore a troubling trend of political protection rather than accountability when Democrats face scandal. Voters deserve clarity: if a congresswoman may have coordinated questions with an Epstein associate, the public has a right to know what Jeffries knows — and what he will do about it. This incident highlights the need for ethical consistency, regardless of party, and calls for Congress to enforce higher standards rather than tolerate silence.

Rep. Jasmine Crockett falsely accused prominent Republicans—including Lee Zeldin—of accepting donations from the late Jeffrey Epstein, but Federal Election Commission filings show the donations came from entirely different individuals with the same name. During a CNN interview, Crockett defended herself by claiming she meant “a Jeffrey Epstein” and blamed her team’s 20-minute Google search for her error. Zeldin swiftly rebuked her claim, pointing out he received contributions from a physician named Jeffrey Epstein—not the convicted sex-trafficker—and called Crockett’s remarks “baseless.” Critics say Crockett’s explanation is irresponsible and embarrassing, especially given how quickly the mistake could have been prevented with basic fact-checking.

🤝🏿✊🏿https://www.patreon.com/tdmediagroup
***For those who recognize the value of TD Media Group as well as the importance of it growing independent of YouTube. Please show your commitment to the channel by joining us on Patreon.***

👍🏿CashApp
https://cash.app/$TDMediaGroup
👍🏿Venmo
@TDMediaGroup
👍🏿PayPal
paypal.me/TDMediaGroup

👍🏿Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCaSqIzQDejXRHKzfW6xreWA/join

***Stay in touch by joining my Telegram group***
https://t.me/tdmediagroup

Follow me on Rumble
https://rumble.com/c/c-5424331

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
🤳🏿📱Follow on Twitter, Instagram & Facebook (TD Media Group)
Twitter: https://twitter.com/TDMediaGroup
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/td_mediagroup/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TDMediaGroupCo/

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#epstein
#epsteinfiles
#epsteincase
#hakeemjeffries
#jasminecrockett
#democrats
#donaldtrump
#trump
#kashpatel
#pambondi
#washingtondc
#washington

#tdmedia
#tdmediagroup
#foxnews
#foxbusiness
#newsnation
#newsmax
#cnn
#msnbc
#msnbcnews
#nbc
#nbcnews
#abc
#abcnews