Actually Sovereign - Fair Use Edit

Media portrays legal challengers as unhinged while dodging their core arguments—blocking exploration of concepts that jeopardize authority.

The 1969 Credit River case exposed banks creating money through mere bookkeeping. Foreclosures proceed despite lenders lacking original notes—a crucial defect conveniently overlooked.

The film contrasts private travel (innate right) with commercial driving (mere privilege)—a distinction the Supreme Court validates yet mainstream labels "fringe." It shows how 1873 Slaughter House Cases established dual citizenship tiers with divergent rights.

Why portray this knowledge as perilous? Perhaps because citizens comprehending the law hierarchy—Divine > Natural > Constitutional > Statutory—embody the ultimate threat to systems dependent on implied consent.

Concealed patterns materialize when investigating these assertions through founding texts and judicial precedents.

Source:
https://rumble.com/user/Disclosurehub