They are attacking us..

Leaflit reacts to @MattWalsh : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_52BmDKFls

Support me ♥ https://www.patreon.com/leaflit
Watch me ♥ https://www.twitch.tv/Leaflit
Kick me ♥ https://www.kick.com/Leaflit
Follow me ♥ https://twitter.com/Leaflit
See me ♥ https://www.tiktok.com/@leaflitvt
Discord ♥ https://discord.com/invite/leaflit
TTRPG ♥ https://rpg.angelssword.com/
MERCH ♥ https://shop.angelssword.com/

Hey everyone — it’s Leaflit here. Today I’m reacting to a pretty wild and disturbing Matt Walsh video about a controversial bio-ethics proposal: that we could breed trillions of ticks that give people a meat allergy—and that some in the climate crowd actually support it in the name of saving the planet.

Here’s what’s going on: certain academics have floated the idea of using the lone star tick to spread alpha-gal syndrome (AGS), a real, potentially serious allergy to red meat. Instead of fighting these ticks as a disease risk, some argue they should be used as a tool to force people not to eat meat anymore. According to them, inducing this allergy could help reduce meat consumption globally, and that’s somehow “morally obligatory.”

I can’t just sit quietly about this:

It’s dehumanizing. Prioritizing the planet over individual health and bodily autonomy is a slippery slope. Deliberately spreading a disease—or at least a serious medical condition—is not “bio-enhancement,” it’s coercion.

It’s dangerous. AGS isn’t just a mild food allergy. According to the CDC, it can be life-threatening.

It shows a terrifying worldview. These “climate ethicists” are essentially saying some people’s biology should be re-engineered—or “enhanced”—without their consent, for a political / environmental goal. That’s playing with people’s lives as if they’re lab experiments.

It erodes trust. When “fixing” the planet becomes more important than respecting human health, what’s next? If these ideas catch on, who gets to decide which diseases are “useful”?

In this reaction I walk through:

What Matt Walsh is exposing and where this proposal even came from.

The real science behind alpha-gal syndrome: how tick bites cause it, what the risks are, and why it’s not something to toy with.

Why the idea of spreading disease for an ideological goal is deeply unethical.

If you care about bioethics, climate overreach, or just want to call out dangerous ideology — please like, subscribe, and hit the bell. And comment below: Do you think these ideas are “hypothetical ethics thought experiments,” or a very real threat?

alpha gal syndrome debate, lone star tick climate plan, climate extremists bioethics ticks, forced meat allergy proposal, AGS climate change, tick-borne allergy climate solution, ethics of bio-engineering ticks, reaction to Matt Walsh tick episode, climate ideology health risk, bioethicist tick engineering, alpha gal syndrome, tick-borne allergy, climate bioethics, forced allergy proposal, meat allergy climate plan, lone star tick, bioengineering ticks, climate extremist ethics, human rights health, pathogen as climate tool, AGS risk, public health coercion, climate ideology critique, Leaflit reaction, Matt Walsh commentary, Matt Walsh tick meat allergy, forced allergy for climate change, climate bioethics tick proposal, AGS tick engineering debate, lone star tick climate idea, reaction to tick engineering, climate ideology health threat, tick-borne meat allergy discussion

If you are the owner of the original video and you want this video removed, please contact: [email protected]

#gaming #vtuber #reaction