Brooks LaPlante-Olney #3 The Wounds

Pretty Good but some incorrect points IMHO
Horne does* say where the rear bullet ended, behind the nose without enough force left to penetrate front skull. as evidenced by damage inside the skull behind the nose.
High forehead wound being a frangible bullet would not necessarily have an exit since they disintegrate.
https://rumble.com/v6rlw8r-dr.-aguilar-and-josiah-thompson-it-wasnt-a-jacketed-bullet-it-was-a-hunting.html
Bullet wipe rules out all these theories that that could be an exit. But this is more of an exploration of multiple theories than a theory itself.
The guy in the photos may or may not even by Kennedy. Thompson is no longer a reliable guy to cite IMO
There's a pretty stiff debunk of his newer book on Costella's site re: David Wimp. It isn't that he got something wrong but had to know it was wrong & published disinfo. Then there's that disinfo short movie on Umbrella Man with the NYT. Then he says the kill shot hit from the rear without really acknowledging Chesser/Mantik & Horne's work showing the reverse.. to me, this guy looks like he takes money to Lie.
LaPlante OTOH engages with it whether or not he's right. I wish he had more presentations online in the public area. also gets into the "mystery photo"
anyway I take anything I hear from Thompson with a caveat. Doesnt mean he's never right, I quoted him in that link above.