Soaring In The Polls As Pauline Hanson’s Burqa Act Was Justified After Bill Was Denied For Debate

A Wake Up Call To All America Muslim Women Who Are Still Alive Today (A Top Imam Leader In USA Said* "Ware Your Hijab Or Burqa Now Or Die In 2026 Period ?") Soaring In The Polls As Pauline Hanson’s One Nation Party *Burqa Act Was Justified After Bill Was Denied For Debate Australian Senate Floor Chambers On November 24, 2025? Pauline Hanson, leader of the One Nation party, wore a burqa in the Australian Senate chamber on November 24, 2025, after her bill to ban burqas and other face coverings in public places was denied debate.

Show more

She framed the act as a justified protest against what she described as undemocratic suppression of discussion, stating, “If Parliament will not ban it, then I will display this oppressive, radical, non-religious head-garment... on the floor of our Parliament so that every Australian knows what's at stake”.

Hanson argued that the refusal to allow a debate while simultaneously prohibiting her from wearing the hijab or burqa in Parliament was hypocritical, especially in the absence of a formal dress code.

Her actions sparked immediate backlash, with cross-party condemnation. Foreign Minister Penny Wong, who leads the government in the Senate, accused Hanson of mocking and vilifying a faith observed by nearly one million Australians, calling the act divisive and damaging to social cohesion.

Minister for Multiculturalism Anne Aly also condemned the stunt as unacceptable and an attempt to divide the nation.

In Islam, a husband holds several rights over his wife, which are derived from the Quran and authentic Hadith. These rights are intended to maintain harmony, stability, and mutual respect within the marital relationship. The following are the 13 rights of a husband over his wife as commonly cited in Islamic teachings:

Wake Up Women: A Rights Of A Husband Over His Wife In America Islamic And Sharia Laws Today! - https://rumble.com/v725yfm-wake-up-women-a-rights-of-a-husband-over-his-wife-in-america-islamic-and-sh.html

We 8 Chinese's Christian women at this channel want to stress... We don't hate Muslims and I don't want you to hate Muslims. That's not the problem here.

My problem is with radical Muslims. If you're the kind of person that comes to this country, you work hard, you pay your taxes, you don't force religion down people's throats, then I don't have a problem with you.

But if you think you're going to come here to this country and force religion down the people's throats and tell people how to live their lives, you got another thing coming.

And if you're the kind of person where you're sad or you're uncomfortable living in America when it's not a Muslim country in the first place, well, I'd be more than happy to show you or tell you the directions to the airport today.

#01. Can the Wife Go out without Husband’s Permission in Islam?

I want to ask to what degree the husband’s duties towards his wife’s family extend. My question is because I am suffering a serious problem with my husband, because he treated my mother very badly when she came to visit us (because of an argument that took place between my mother-in-law and my mother); in the end my husband virtually threw my mother out. As a result of that, I had to leave the house with my mother, against my husband’s wishes as he wanted me to stay with him. Please note that I used to live in another country and I travelled with my mother to our country. My husband treats me very well, but I got angry when he treated her in this manner. He regretted it the next day, but she will not forgive him. Is what I did correct, or did I fail to obey my husband as enjoined by Allah, may He be exalted and glorified?

It is prohibited for a woman to go out of the house without the husband’s permission except in cases of necessity, or Shar`i obligations. With regard to a woman travelling without a Mahram, this is also prohibited.

Praise be to Allah, and blessings and peace be upon the Messenger of Allah:

Upholding family ties and treating in-laws kindly

The husband should uphold ties with his wife’s family and treat them well. This is part of treating his wife kindly, because doing that makes her happy and earns him respect in her eyes, and increases the love and affection between them.

Allah says (interpretation of the meaning): “…and live with them honourably.” [An-Nisa’ 4:19]

Ibn Kathir said:

“I.e., speak kindly to them, treat them well and pay attention to your deeds and your appearance as much as you can; as you would like her to do for you, do the same for her. Allah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“And they (women) have rights (over their husbands as regards living expenses) similar (to those of their husbands) over them (as regards obedience and respect) to what is reasonable.” [Al-Baqarah 2:228]

The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: “The best of you is the one who is best towards his family; and I am the best of you towards my family.” (Classed as authentic by Al-Albani in As-Silsilah As-Sahihah, 285." (Tafsir Ibn Kathir, 1/477 )

The role of apology and forgiveness in marriage

With regard to your husband throwing your mother out of his house, he has apologised for that, and if a person apologises, the apology should be accepted and his mistake should be overlooked.

The married woman should remember that obedience to her husband takes precedence over obedience to her parents. A man should not give precedence to anyone over his mother with regard to kind treatment, and a woman should not give precedence to anyone over her husband with regard to obedience. That is because of the greatness of the rights that he has over her. Part of the greatness of men’s rights over women is that Shari`ah almost commanded women to prostrate to men, were it not for the fact that it is not permissible for anyone to prostrate to any human being.

The husband has no right to prevent his wife’s family from visiting their daughter , unless he fears that they may cause some mischief to her or encourage her to be willfully defiant towards him (Nashiz). In that case, he may prevent visits.

#02. Wife going out without the husband’s permission in Islam?

You made two mistakes and went against Shari`ah by doing them. The first mistake was going out of the house without your husband’s permission , and the second was travelling without a Mahram.

Going out of the house without the husband’s permission is a prohibited action; Allah has even forbidden women who are revocably divorced (first or second divorce) from going out of their houses, so how about women who are not in that position? Allah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“O Prophet! When you divorce women, divorce them at their `Iddah (prescribed periods) and count (accurately) their `Iddah (periods). And fear Allah your Lord (O Muslims). And turn them not out of their (husband’s) homes nor shall they (themselves) leave, except in case they are guilty of some open illegal sexual intercourse. And those are the set limits of Allah. And whosoever transgresses the set limits of Allah, then indeed he has wronged himself.” [At-Talaq 65:1]

Shaykh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah said:

“Zayd ibn Thabit said: The husband is the master according to the Book of Allah, and he recited the verse in which Allah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“They both found her lord [sayyid] (i.e. her husband) at the door.” [Yusuf 12:25]

`Umar ibn Al-Khattab said: “Marriage is slavery, so be careful with regard to whom you give your daughter for enslavement.” In At-Tirmidhi and elsewhere it is narrated that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: “I urge you to treat women well, for they are prisoners with you.”

So a woman is like a slave or prisoner of her husband, and she cannot go out of his house except with his permission, whether her father, her mother or anyone else tells her to do that, according to the consensus of the imams." (Al-Fatawa Al-Kubra, 3/148)

Ibn Muflih Al-Hanbali said:

“It is prohibited for a woman to go out of her husband’s house without his permission, except in cases of necessity, or Shar`i obligations." (Al-Adab Ash-Shar`iyyah, 3/375)

With regard to a woman travelling without a mahram , this is prohibited. This is stated in authentic Hadiths from the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him).

An-Nawawi said:

“Everything that is called travelling, it is forbidden for a woman to do without her husband or a mahram, whether it is three days, two days or one day, or Barid (a distance equivalent to approximately twenty kilometres) or anything else, because of the Hadith of Ibn `Abbas, according to which the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: “No woman should travel without a Mahram.” This includes everything that is called travel. And Allah knows best.” (Sharh Muslim, 9/103)

And Allah knows best.

https://www.fajralquran.com/blog/islamic-laws-for-women/

#03. Is the First Look at Women Allowed?

I know it is absolutely forbidden to gaze at women. If one accidentally catches my eyes sometimes I keep looking for a second or two and then I remember Allah's command and immediately look down.

My question is: for that very little time that I do look at the lady, do I earn sins?

Deliberately looking at a non-Mahram woman and continuing to look after a first accidental glance is prohibited. It is forbidden to look at any part of her body, whether you think she is beautiful or not, whether it provokes sexual desire or not, whether it is accompanied by evil thoughts or not, and whether it leads to immoral deeds or not.

Praise be to Allah, and blessings and peace be upon the Messenger of Allah:

Jarir ibn Abdullah (may Allah be pleased with him) said: "I asked the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon Him) about an accidental glance at a woman . He commanded me to turn my gaze away." (Narrated by At-Tirmidhi, who said: This is an authentic Hadith. See As-Sunan, 2700).

Commenting on this Hadith, Al-Mubarakpuri (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

"Accidental means that his gaze fell on a non-Mahram woman unintentionally . He commanded me to turn my gaze away means that he was not to look a second time, because the first glance was not by choice and would be forgiven, but any further glances would be counted as sin, and he should heed the words of Allah (interpretation of the meaning): Tell the believing men to lower their gaze (from looking at forbidden things) [An-Nur 24:30]"

The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon Him) said: "O `Ali, do not follow a glance with another, for you will be forgiven for the first, but not for the second." (Narrated by At-Tirmidhi, 2701; see Sahih Al-Jami`, 7953)

In At-Tuhfah, it says: "The words ‘do not follow a glance with another’ mean do not look again after the first glance. You will be forgiven for the first means that you will be forgiven if the first glance was unintentional, and but not for the second means that because the second glance was by choice, it will be counted against you."

So it is clear that deliberately looking at a non-Mahram woman and continuing to look after a first accidental glance is prohibited. It is forbidden to look at any part of her body, whether you think she is beautiful or not, whether it provokes sexual desire or not, whether it is accompanied by evil thoughts or not, and whether it leads to immoral deeds or not.

We ask Allah to protect you and us from all forbidden deeds. Allah is the One Who guides to the Straight Path.

For more details, please see the following answers: 113996 , 49024 , 21784 , and 37654 .

And Allah knows best.

#04. Shaking Hands with Non-Mahram Women?

I would like a detailed answer on the ruling on a man shaking hands with a woman, and the views of the four imams and the majority of scholars on that.

It is not permissible for a man to touch the hands of a woman who is not one of his Mahrams. It is not permissible to shake hands even with a barrier in between such as shaking hands from beneath a garment and the like. The same ruling applies to shaking hands with old women.

Praise be to Allah, and blessings and peace be upon the Messenger of Allah:

Shaking hands with non-Mahram women
It is not permissible for a man who believes in Allah and His Messenger to put his hand in the hand of a woman who is not permissible for him or who is not one of his Mahrams. Whoever does that has wronged himself (i.e., sinned).

It was narrated that Ma`qil ibn Yassar (may Allah be pleased with him) said: the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: “For one of you to be stabbed in the head with an iron needle is better for him than that he should touch a woman who is not permissible for him.” (Narrated by At-Tabarani in Al-Kabir, 486. Shaykh Al-Albani classed it as authentic in Sahih Al-Jami`, 5045.)

This Hadith alone is sufficient to deter and to instil the obedience required of us by Allah, because it implies that touching women may lead to temptation and immorality.

It was narrated that `A’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) the wife of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: “When the believing women migrated to the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him), they would be tested in accordance with the words of Allah (interpretation of the meaning):

{O Prophet! When believing women come to you to give you the Bay`ah (pledge), that they will not associate anything in worship with Allah, that they will not steal, that they will not commit illegal sexual intercourse} [Al-Mumtahanah 60:12]

`A’ishah said: Whoever among the believing women agreed to that had passed the test, and when the women agreed to that, the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said to them: “Go, for you have given your oath of allegiance.` No, by Allah, the hand of the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) never touched the hand of any woman, rather they would give their oath of allegiance with words only.” And `A’ishah said: “By Allah, the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) only took the oath of allegiance from the women in the manner prescribed by Allah, and the hand of the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) never touched the hand of any woman. When he had taken their oath of allegiance he would say, `I have accepted your oath of allegiance verbally.`” (Narrated by Muslim, 1866)

It was narrated from `Urwah that `A’ishah told him about the women’s oath of allegiance: “The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) never touched any woman with his hand. He would explain to the woman what the oath of allegiance implied, and when she accepted, he would say ‘Go, for you have given your oath of allegiance.’” (Narrated by Muslim, 1866)

This infallible one, the best of mankind, the leader of the sons of Adam on the Day of Resurrection, did not touch women. This is despite the fact that the oath of allegiance was originally given by hand. So how about men other than the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him)?

It was narrated that Umaymah the daughter of Raqiqah said: The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said, “I do not shake hands with women.” (Narrated by An-Nasa`i, 4181 and Ibn Majah, 2874; classed as authentic by Al-Albani in Sahih Al-Jami`, 2513)

#05. Can you shake hands with non-Mahram women with a barrier in between?

It is not permissible to shake hands even with a barrier in between, such as shaking hands from beneath a garment and the like. The Hadith that was narrated allowing that is inauthentic.

It was narrated from Ma`qal ibn Yassar that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) used to shake hands with women from beneath a garment.” (Narrated by At-Tabarani in Al-Awsat, 2855)

Al-Haythami (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

“This was narrated by At-Tabarani in Al-Kabir and Al-Awsat. Its chain of narration includes `Atab ibn Harb, who is weak.” (Majma` Al-Zawa`id, 6/39)

Wali Ad-Din Al-`Iraqi said:

“The words of `A’ishah, “He used to accept the women’s oath of allegiance by words only” mean that he did so without taking their hands or shaking hands with them. This indicates that the Bay`ah of men was accepted by taking their hands and shaking hands with them, as well as by words, and this is how it was. What `A’ishah mentioned was the custom.

Some of the commentators of the Quran mentioned that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) called for a vessel of water and dipped his hand in it, then the women dipped their hands in it. And some of them said that he did not shake hands with them from behind a barrier and had a Qatari cloak over his hand. And it was said that `Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) shook hands with them on his behalf. None of these reports are sound, especially the last one, "How could `Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) have done something that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him), who was Ma`sum (infallible), would not do?” (End quote from Tarh At-Tathrib, 7/45)

Shaykh Ibn Baz (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

The most correct view is that this (i.e., shaking hands with women from behind a barrier) is not allowed at all, because of the general meaning of the Hadith, according to which the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said, “I do not shake hands with women;” and so as to ward off the means that may lead to evil. (Adapted from Hashiyat Majmu`at Rasa`il fi`l-Hijab was-Sufur, p. 69)

#06. Can men shake hands with old women?

The same ruling applies to shaking hands with old women; this is also prohibited because of the general meaning of the texts on this issue. The reports that say it is permissible are inauthentic.

Al-Zayla`i (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

“As for the report that Abu Bakr used to shake hands with old women, it is also inauthentic.” (Nasab Ar-Rayah, 4/240)

Ibn Hajar (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

“I cannot find this Hadith.” (End quote from Ad-Dirayah fi Takhrij Ahadith Al-Hidayah, 2/225)

Views of the four imams on shaking hands with non-Mahram women

With regard to the views of the four imams, they are as follows:

The Hanafi Madhhab:
Ibn Nujaym (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

“It is not permissible for a man to touch a woman’s face or hands even if there is no risk of desire because it is prohibited in principle and there is no necessity that would allow it.” (End quote from Al-Bahr Al-Ra’iq, 8/219)

The Maliki Madhhab:
Muhammad ibn Ahmad (`Ulaysh) (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

“It is not permissible for a man to touch the face or hand of a non-Mahram woman, and it is not permissible for him to put his hand on hers without a barrier. `A’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) said: “The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) never accepted a woman`s oath of allegiance by shaking hands with her; rather he (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) used to accept their oath of allegiance by words only.” According to another report, “His hand never touched the hand of a woman, rather he would accept their oath of allegiance by words only.” (End quote from Minah Al-Jalil Sharh Mukhtasar Khalil, 1/223)

The Shafa`i Madhhab:
An-Nawawi (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

“It is not permissible to touch a woman in any way.” (End quote from Al-Majmu`, 4/515)

Wali Ad-Din Al-`Iraqi (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

“This indicates that the hand of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) did not touch the hand of any woman apart from his wives and concubines, whether in the case of accepting the oath of allegiance or in other cases. If he did not do that despite the fact that he was infallible and beyond suspicion, then it is even more essential that others heed this prohibition. It appears from the texts that he refrained from doing that because it was prohibited for him to do so. The jurists among our companions and others said that it is prohibited to touch a non-Mahram woman even if that is not touching parts of her body that are not `Awrah, such as her face. But they differed with regard to looking when there is no desire and no fear of Fitnah. The prohibition on touching is stronger than the prohibition on looking, and it is prohibited when there is no necessity that would allow it. If it is the case of necessity, e.g. medical treatment, removing a tooth or treating the eyes, etc., if there is no woman who can do that, then it is permissible for a non-Mahram to do that because it is the case of necessity.” (End quote from Tarh At-Tathrib, 7/45, 46)

The Hanbali Madhhab
Ibn Muflih (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

“Abu `Abdullah – i.e., Imam Ahmad – was asked about a man who shakes hands with a woman. He said, No, and was emphatic that it is prohibited. I said, "Should he shake hands with her from beneath his garment?" He said, “No.”

Shaykh Taqiy Ad-Din also favoured the view that it is prohibited, and gave the reason that touching is more serious than looking.” (End quote from Al-Adab As-Shar`iyyah, 2/257)

And Allah knows best.

#07. What is the ruling on looking at the faces of hijabi women?

I live in an area where there are a lot of hijabi women, and out of necessity I have to speak to one of them from time to time. Can I look at their faces when speaking to them, or is averting the gaze obligatory even if they are wearing hijab?

Praise be to Allah, and blessings and peace be upon the Messenger of Allah:

Allah, may He be exalted, has commanded men to avert their gaze from that which is haraam and is not permissible for them to look at. One of the things that is forbidden to them is looking at women who are not their mahrams, just as the same command is also addressed to women, to avert their gaze from that which Allah, may He be exalted, has forbidden. One of the things that is forbidden to women is to look at men who are not their mahrams. Allah, may He be exalted, says (interpretation of the meaning):

“Tell the believing men to avert their gaze and guard their private parts. That is purer for them. Indeed, Allah is Acquainted with what they do.

And tell the believing women to avert their gaze and guard their private parts…”

[an-Noor 24:30-31].

It is permissible to look at a non-mahram woman when there is a need to do so, which includes looking at her when buying and selling, giving testimony, giving or receiving medical treatment, and proposing marriage. As for looking with desire, that is forbidden according to scholarly consensus.

See the cases in which it is permissible to look at a non-mahram woman in the answer to question no. 2198.

The questioner did not mention the reason why he needs to look at hijabi women in his city. If what he meant was any of the reasons that we have mentioned which make it permissible to look, then there is nothing wrong with that, so long as he looks only as much as is necessary and does not go beyond that, because the basic principle is that he should avert his gaze, as mentioned in the verses quoted above.

If he wants to look at them because he is simply talking to them without there being any of the cases of necessity that we have mentioned above, or similar reasons, then he is clearly enjoined to also avert his gaze from the one who is speaking to him, especially if she is young and there is no guarantee that there will be no temptation; in fact temptation and its causes are widespread.

See the answer to question no. 114196 for further explanation. Among other things, we said there:

With regard to a hijabi woman who uncovers her face only – despite the fact that she is going against the more correct shar‘i ruling which dictates that it is obligatory for a woman to cover her face – when there is a need for a man to deal with her for the purpose of buying, selling, helping, teaching, medical treatment, testimony, proposing marriage and so on, it is permissible to look at her face as much as is necessary, on condition that that is not accompanied by desire and there is no fear that he will be tempted.… End quote.

And Allah knows best.

#08. Ruling on women looking at men.?

Is it permissible for a woman to look at men who are not her mahrams, or is that haram?.

Praise be to Allah, and blessings and peace be upon the Messenger of Allah:

Shaykh Muhammad ibn Saalih ibn ‘Uthaymeen (may Allah have mercy on him) was asked:

What is the ruling on a woman looking at a man on TV or looking in an ordinary fashion in the street?

He replied:

When women look at men, whether that is on TV or otherwise, one of the following two scenarios must apply:

1 – Looking with desire and enjoyment, which is haram because of the evil and fitnah (temptation) involved

2 – Simply looking with no desire or enjoyment; there is nothing wrong with this according to the correct scholarly view, and this is permissible because it was proven that ‘Aa’ishah (may Allah be pleased with her) watched the Ethiopians when they were playing in the mosque, and the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) was screening her from them, and he approved of her doing that.

Women walk in the markets and look at men even when they are wearing hijab, so a woman may look at a man even when he does not look at her, on condition that there be no feelings of desire or fitnah (temptation). If there are any feelings of desire or fitnah (temptation) then it is haram to look, whether the man is on TV or otherwise.

#09. Evidence Prohibiting of Mixing of Men and Women.?

My husband and I wanted to know if it were permissable to take Arabic classes at a college where the classes are mixed (men-women). We understand that there is no mixing between the sexes, but confused about the definition of "mixing". Please tell us what is permissible, what is not and give proof.

Praise be to Allah, and blessings and peace be upon the Messenger of Allah:

The meeting together, mixing, and intermingling of men and women in one place, the crowding of them together, and the revealing and exposure of women to men are prohibited by the Law of Islam (Shari'ah). These acts are prohibited because they are among the causes for fitnah (temptation or trial which implies evil consequences), the arousing of desires, and the committing of indecency and wrongdoing.

Among the many proofs of prohibition of the meeting and mixing of men and women in the Quran and Sunnah are:

Verse No. 53 of Surat al-Ahzab, or the Confederates (Interpretation of the meaning); "...for anything ye want, ask them from before a screen: that makes for greater purity for your hearts and for theirs..."

In explaining this Verse, Ibn Kathir (May Allah have mercy on him) said: "Meaning, as I forbade you to enter their rooms, I forbid you to look at them at all. If one wants to take something from them, one should do so without looking at them. If one wants to ask a woman for something, the same has to be done from behind a screen."

The Prophet (May peace and blessings be upon him) enforced separation of men and women even at Allah’s most revered and preferred place, the mosque. This was accomplished via the separation of the women’s rows from the men’s; men were asked to stay in the mosque after completion of the obligatory prayer so that women will have enough time to leave the mosque; and, a special door was assigned to women. Evidence of the foregoing are:

Umm Salamah (May Allah be pleased with her) said that after Allah’s Messenger (May peace and blessings be upon him) said "as-Salamu ‘Alaykum wa Rahmatullah’ twice announcing the end of prayer, women would stand up and leave. He would stay for a while before leaving. Ibn Shihab said that he thought that the staying of the Prophet (May peace and blessings be upon him) was in order for the women to be able to leave before the men who wanted to depart." Narrated by al-Bukhari under No. 793.

Abu Dawood under No. 876 narrates the same hadith in Kitab al-Salaat under the title "Insiraaf an-Nisaa’ Qabl al-Rijaal min al-Salaah" (Departure of Women before Men after the Prayer). Ibn ‘Umar said that Allah’s Messenger (May peace and blessings be upon him) said: "We should leave this door (of the mosque) for women." Naafi’ said: "Ibn ‘Umar never again entered through that door until he died." Narrated by Abu Dawood under No. 484 in "Kitab as-Salah" under the Chapter entitled: "at-Tashdid fi Thalik".

Abu Hurayrah said that the Prophet (May peace and blessings be upon him) said: ""The best of the men’s rows is the first and the worst is the last, and the best of the women’s rows is the last and the worst in the first." Narrated by Muslim under No. 664.

This is the greatest evidence that the Law of Islam (Shari'ah) forbids meeting and mixing of men and women. The farther the men are from the women’s rows, the better, and vice versa.

If these procedures and precautions were prescribed and adhered to in a mosque, which is a pure place of worship where people are as far away as they ever are from the arousal of desire and temptation, then no doubt the same procedures need to be followed even more rigorously at other places.

Abu Usayd al-Ansari narrated that he heard Allah’s Messenger (May peace and blessings be upon him) say to the women on his way out of the mosque when he saw men and women mixing together on their way home:
‘Give way (i.e., walk to the sides) as it is not appropriate for you to walk in the middle the road.’ Thereafter, women would walk so close to the wall that their dresses would get caught on it. Narrated by Abu Dawood in "Kitab al-Adab min Sunanihi, Chapter: Mashyu an-Nisa Ma’ ar-Rijal fi at-Tariq."We know that the intermingling, mixing and crowding together of men and women is part of today’s unavoidable yet regrettable affliction in most places, such as markets, hospitals, colleges, etc., but:

· We will not willfully choose or accept mixing and crowding, particularly in religious classes and council meetings in Islamic Centers.

· We take precautions to avoid meeting and mixing of men and women as much as possible while at the same time achieving desired goals and objectives. This result can be achieved by designating separate places assigned for men and women, using different doors for each, utilizing modern means of communication such as microphones, video recorders etc., and expediting efforts to have enough female teachers to teach women, etc.

· We show fear of Allah as much as we can by not looking at members of the opposite sex and by applying self-restraint.
There follow some of the results of a study on mixing undertaken by some Muslim social science researchers.

#10. When we put the following question: What is the Islamic ruling on mixing as far as you know? The results were as follows:

76% of respondents said “It is not permitted.”

12% said, “It is permitted” – but moral, religious, etc. restrictions apply…

12% said, “I don’t know.”

Which would you choose?

If you had the choice between working in a mixed workplace and working in another where there was no mixing, which would you choose?

The responses to this question were as follows:

76% would choose the workplace where there was no mixing.

9% preferred the mixed workplace.

15% would accept any workplace which suited their specialties, regardless of whether it was mixed or not.

Very embarrassing

Have any embarrassing situations ever happened to you because of mixing?

Among the embarrassing moments mentioned by respondents in this study were the following:

I was at work one day, and I went into one department where one of my female colleagues who wears hijaab had taken off her hijaab in front of her female colleagues. My entrance took her by surprise and I was very embarrassed as a result.

I had to do an experiment in the lab at university, but I was absent on the day of the experiment. I had to go to the lab on the following day, and I found myself the only male among a group of female students, in addition to a female teacher and a female lab technician. I was very embarrassed and felt very awkward with all those female eyes glaring at me.

I was trying to take a feminine towel out of one of the drawers when I was surprised by a male colleague standing behind me, who wanted to take something from his own private drawer. He noticed that I was embarrassed and he left the room quickly to avoid my embarrassment.

It so happened that one of the girls at the university bumped into me when turning a corner in a crowded corridor. She was walking quickly, going to one of the lectures. As a result of this collision, she lost her balance, and I caught her in my arms, as if I was embracing her. You can imagine how embarrassed I and this girl felt in front of a group of careless young people.

One of my female colleagues fell on the stairs in the university and her clothes fell open in an extremely embarrassing fashion. She landed upside down and could not help herself; the young men standing nearby had no option but to cover her and help her to get up.

I work in a company and I went in to give some papers to my boss. When I was going out, my boss called me back. I turned around and saw him with his face turned away. I was waiting for him to ask me for a file or for more papers, and I was surprised by his hesitancy. I turned away to the left side of his office, pretending to be busy with something, and he spoke to me at the same time. I thought that this boss would say anything except what he actually said, which was to point out that my garment was stained with menstrual blood. Can the earth open up and swallow a human being at the moment of making sincere supplication? For I prayed that the earth would open up and swallow me.

Victims of mixing… True stories

Lost hope

Umm Muhammad, a mature woman over the age of 40, tells her story.

I lived a life of modest means with my husband. There was never any closeness and harmony, and my husband did not have the kind of strong personality that a woman would hope for, but his good nature made me overlook the fact that I was the one who was responsible for most of the decision making in the family.

My husband often used to mention the name of his friend and business partner, and he would talk about him in my presence, and I often used to meet with him in his office which was originally part of our apartment. This went on for many years, until circumstances led to us exchanging visits with this person and his family. These family visits were repeated and because of his close friendship with my husband, we did not notice how the number of visits increased and how many hours a single visit would last. He often used to come on his own to sit with us, me and my husband, for long visits. My husband’s trust in him knew no bounds, and as days passed I got to know this person very well, and saw how wonderful and decent he was. I began to feel a strong attraction towards this man, and at the same time I began to sense that the feeling was mutual.

Things took a strange turn after that, when I realized that this man was the kind of person I had always dreamed about. Why had he come along now, after all these years? The more this man’s status increased in my eyes, the more my husband’s status diminished. It was as if I had needed to see the beauty of his character in order to discover how ugly my husband’s character was.

The matter between this person and myself did not go beyond these persistent thoughts which were occupying my mind night and day. Neither he nor I ever voiced what we felt in our hearts… until today. Yet despite that my life is over and my husband is little more than a weak man with no self-esteem. I hate him and I do not know how all this hatred towards him started to boil over. I wonder how I put up with him all these years, bearing all these burdens by myself, facing life’s problems on my own.

Things got so bad that I asked him for a divorce, and he divorced me at my request. After that he became a broken man. Even worse than that is that after my marriage was wrecked and my children and husband were devastated, problems arose in this man's family. His wife, with her feminine intuition, realized what had been going on in his heart of hearts, and his life became hell. She was overwhelmed with jealousy to the extent that one night she left her house at 2 a.m. and came to attack my house, screaming, weeping and hurling accusations. His marriage was also about to collapse.

I admit that the lovely gatherings which we used to enjoy gave us the opportunity to get to know one another at a time that was not appropriate at this stage in our lives.

His marriage has been wrecked and so has mine. I have lost everything, and now I know that my circumstances and his will not permit us to take any positive step towards coming together. Now I am more miserable than I have ever been, and I am looking for illusionary happiness and lost hopes.

Tit-for-tat

Umm Ahmad tells us:

My husband had a group of married friends, and because of our close friendship with them, we used to get together with them once a week in one of our houses, to enjoy an evening of chat.

Deep down in my heart I was never really comfortable with the atmosphere in which we would have dinner, sweets, snacks and drinks of juice accompanied by waves of laughter because of the jokes and chit-chats that often went beyond the bounds of good manners.

In the name of friendship, the barriers were lifted and every now and then one would hear suppressed laughter between a woman and the husband of another woman. The jokes were too much, dealing – with no sense of shyness –with sensitive topics such as sex and women’s private matters. This was usual and was even accepted and regarded as desirable.

Although I indulged in these things along with them, my conscience made me feel guilty. Then the day came when it became quite clear just how ugly and filthy this atmosphere was.

The telephone rang, and I heard the voice of one of the friends in this group. I said hello to him and apologized that my husband was not home. He replied that he knew that, and that he was calling to speak to me! After he suggested starting a relationship with me, I got very angry and spoke harshly to him and cursed him. All he could do was laugh and say, “Don’t try and show these good manners to me; go and check on your husband’s good manners and see what he is doing…” I was devastated by what he said, but I pulled myself together and said to myself, this person is only trying to cause the break up of your marriage. But he succeeded in planting the seeds of doubt concerning my husband.

Shortly after that, the major disaster struck. I discovered that my husband was cheating on me with another woman. It was the matter of life or death as far as I was concerned. I found my husband out and I confronted him, saying: “You are not the only one who can have a relationship. I have received a similar proposition.” And I told him all about his friend. He was stunned and absolutely shocked. (I said:) “If you want me to respond in kind to your relationship with that woman, then this is for that, tit-for-tat.” This was a huge slap in the face for him. He knew that I did not intend to do that in reality, but he realized the great disaster that had befallen our lives and the immoral atmosphere in which we were living. I suffered a great deal until my husband finally left that loose woman with whom he was having a relationship, as he admitted to me. Yes, he left her and came back to his family and children, but how can I ever feel the same towards him as I used to? Who will restore respect for him in my heart? This huge wound in my heart is still bleeding out of regret and rage at that filthy atmosphere; it still bears testimony to the fact that what they call innocent get-togethers are in reality anything but innocent. My heart still begs for mercy from the Lord of Glory.

Intelligence can also be a temptation (fitnah)

‘Abd al-Fattaah says:

I work as the head of department in one of the big companies. For a long time I admired one of my female colleagues, not for her beauty, but for her serious attitude towards her work, her intelligence and her excellent achievements – in addition to the fact that she was a decent and modest person who focused only on her work. This admiration turned into attachment, and I am a married man who fears Allah and never misses any obligatory prayer. I expressed my feelings to her and she rebuffed me. She is married and has children as well. She sees no reason why I should have any kind of relationship with her, whether it be friendship, as work colleagues or based on admiration… etc. Evil thoughts come to me sometimes, and deep down I wish that her husband would divorce her so that I could get her.

I started to put pressure on her at work and put her down in front of my bosses. Perhaps this was a form of revenge on my part, but she accepted it with good manners and did not complain or comment. She works and works; her performance speaks of her quality, and she knows this well. The more she resisted me, the stronger my infatuation grew.

I am not a person who is easily tempted by women, because I fear Allah and I do not overstep the mark with them and go beyond what is required by my work. But this woman attracted me. What is the solution?… I do not know.

Baby ducks know how to swim

N.A.A., a nineteen-year-old girl, tells us:

At that time I was a little girl. My innocent eyes watched those evening get-togethers when family friends would meet in the house. What I remember is that I could only see one man, who was my father. I watched him as he moved about the room, how his glances would devour the women present, looking at their thighs and chests, admiring this one’s eyes, that one’s hair, the other’s hips. My poor mother had no choice but to take care of these get-togethers. She was a very simple lady.

Among the women present there was one woman who would deliberately try to attract my father’s attention, sometimes by coming close to him, and sometimes by making enticing movements. I would watch this with concern, whilst my mother was busy in the kitchen for the sake of her guests.

These gatherings stopped suddenly and I tried, young as I was, to understand and make sense of what had happened, but I could not.

What I remember was that my mother collapsed completely at that time, and she could not stand to hear my father’s name mentioned in the house. I used to hear mysterious words whispered by the adults around me: “Betrayal… bedroom… she saw them with her own eyes… despicable woman… in a very shameful position…” etc. These were the key words which only the adults could understand.

I grew up and came to understand, and I bore a grudge against all men. All of them were treacherous. My mother was a broken woman and accused every woman who came to us of being a man-snatcher who wanted to make my father fall into her trap. My father hasn’t changed. He is still practising his favourite hobby of chasing women, but now he does it outside the home. Now I am nineteen years old and I know lots of young men. I feel great pleasure in taking revenge on them, because every one of them is an exact copy of my father. I tempt them and entice them, without letting them get anywhere near me. They follow me in gatherings and in the marketplaces because of my movements and deliberate gestures. Sometimes my phone never stops ringing and I feel proud of what I do to avenge the sex of Hawwa’ and my mother. But sometimes I feel so miserable and such a failure that it almost chokes me. My life is shadowed by a huge dark cloud, and its name is my father.

Before it is too late

S.N.A. tells of her experience:

I never imagined that my work circumstances would force me to be in contact with the opposite sex (men), but this in fact is what happened…

In the beginning, I used to cover and screen myself from men by wearing niqaab (face-veil), but some of the sisters advised me that this dress was attracting more attention to my presence, and it would be better for me to take off the niqaab, especially since my eyes were somewhat attractive. So I removed the cover from my face, thinking that this was better. But by continuing to mix with my colleagues, I discovered that I was the odd one out because of my antisocial attitude and my insistence on not joining in the conversation and chatting with others. Everyone was wary of this “lone-wolf” woman (as they saw me), and this is what was stated clearly by one person who affirmed that he would not want to deal with such a snooty and stand-offish character. But I knew that I was the opposite, in fact, and I decided that I would not oppress myself and put myself in a difficult position with my colleagues. So I started to join in their chats and exchanges of anecdotes, and they all discovered that I could speak eloquently and persuasively, and that I could influence others. I could also speak in a manner that was determined yet at the same time was attractive to some of my colleagues. It was not long before I noticed some changes in the expression of my direct supervisor; with some embarrassment, he was enjoying the way I spoke and moved, and he would deliberately bring up topics in the conversation where I would see that hateful look in his eyes. I do not deny the fact that I started to entertain some thoughts about this man. I found it astonishing that a man could fall so easily into the trap of a woman who was religiously committed, so how must it be in the case of women who adorn themselves and invite men to commit immoral actions? In fact, I did not think of him in any way which went beyond the bounds of sharee’ah, but he did occupy a space in my thoughts for quite some time. But soon my self-respect made me reject the idea of being a source of enjoyment for this man in any way, shape or form, even if it was only psychological in nature, and I stopped getting involved in any kind of work that would force me to sit alone with him. In the end, I reached the following conclusions:

1- Attraction between the sexes can occur in any circumstances, no matter how much men and women may deny that. The attraction may start within the bounds of sharee’ah and end up going beyond those bounds.

2- Even if a person protects himself (by marriage), he is not safe from the snares of the Shaytaan.

3- Even though a person may be able to guarantee himself and he works with the opposite sex within reasonable limits, he cannot guarantee the feelings of the other party.

Finally, there is nothing good in mixing and it does not bear fruit as they claim. On the contrary, it corrupts sound thinking.

What now?

We may ask, what comes next, after this discussion on the matter of mixing?

It’s about time for us to recognize that no matter how we try to beautify the issue of mixing and take the matter lightly, its consequences are bound to catch up with us, and the harm it causes will have disastrous results for our families. Sound common sense refuses to accept that mixing is a healthy atmosphere for human relations. This is the sound common sense which made most of the people included in this survey (76%) prefer working in a non-mixed environment. The same percentage (76%) said that mixing is not permitted according to the sharee’ah. What makes us sit up and take notice is not this honourable percentage – which indicates the purity of our Islamic society and the cleanness of its members’ hearts – but the small number who said that mixing is permitted; they number 12%. This group, with no exceptions, said that mixing is permitted but within the limits set by religion, custom (‘urf), traditions, good manners, conscience, modesty, covering and other worthy values which, in their opinion, keep mixing within proper limits.

We ask them: is the mixing which we see nowadays in our universities, market-places, work-places and family and social gatherings, taking place within the limits referred to above? Or are these places filled with transgressions in terms of clothing, speech, interactions and behaviour? We see wanton displays of adornment (tabarruj), not proper covering; we see fitnah (temptations) and dubious relationships, with no good manners and no conscience and no covering. We can conclude that the kind of mixing that is happening nowadays is unacceptable even to those who approve of mixing in a clean atmosphere.

It’s about time for us to recognize that mixing provides a fertile breeding-ground for social poisons to invade and take over our society without anyone ever realizing that it is mixing which is the cause. Mixing is the prime element in this silent fitnah, in the shade of which betrayals erupt, homes are wrecked and hearts are broken.

We ask Allah to keep us safe and sound, and to reform our society. May Allah bless our Prophet Muhammad.

#11. Jizya Is A Tax Imposed On Non-Muslim Under Sharia Laws. Zohran Mamdani This Man In The Video Is Right... He Explains It Very Clearly: All American Need To Know... This Money Is Paid In Exchange For Your Life... Simply Because You Are Considered An "Enemy Of Allah" Here’s the thing: who is going to protect us from the Muslim sharia patrol? Consider the bigoted and genocidal Jew-hared central to Islamic texts and teachings today.

America Peoples also need to remember that 92% of Muslim immigration cum-ing into USA are military age men only... without bring are family with us... (no wife and no kids) to USA from third world Muslim majority countries. Remember In Islam we may have up to 4 wife's starting at age 6 yrs. Old and we are only having sex with white young teens as slave or a concubine Under Islamic & Sharia Law Only.

According to Islamic jurisprudence as presented in the provided sources, a Muslim man is permitted to have sexual relations with a female slave or concubine under specific conditions. This permission is derived from Quranic verses, such as Surah Al-Mu’minun 23:5-6 and Surah Al-Ma’aarij 70:30, which state that sexual relations are permissible with one's wives or with "those whom their right hands possess".

The term "those whom their right hands possess" refers to female slaves acquired through lawful means, such as being captured as prisoners of war during a jihad, or purchased in a legitimate transaction.

The permissibility of sexual relations with a concubine is conditional upon the woman being in a state of ownership by the man. A female slave becomes permissible for sexual relations after her master has acquired her legally, and she must not be pregnant; if she is pregnant, intercourse is prohibited until she gives birth, and if she is not pregnant, she must menstruate at least once before intercourse is allowed.

The ownership of a slave is considered to grant the master the right to sexual relations with her, and this right is seen as a lawful benefit derived from ownership, analogous to other rights such as labor or sale.

#12. The Somali & Islamic saying "gabadh ama god hakaaga jirto ama gunti rag" loosely translates to "A Girl Should Either Be Married Or In A Grave".

Yes Most Muslim's And Far Left America And Pedophile's Love Sharia Law And It Is Better Than The American Following It Own U.S.A. Laws. It's Because The Age Of Consent To Get Married Is 6 Yrs. Old & Age To Have Sexual Intercourse With A Child Is 9 Yrs. Old Period And The Child Said About It? (You Promised Me A Happy Meal) As The Child Is Crying After Being Rape By Ten Men Daily... So This Is How It Will Work In America For Both Side Today. So All America Remember This That Islam Is A Religion Peace And Raping Gangs Is Cum-ing To A America City Near You Soon In 2026... Islam Has Officially Taken Over The People's Republic Of New York City-State Is Under Sharia Laws. ps. Remember In Islam Its not called raping a child... Its having sex with a slave or a concubine Under Islamic & Sharia Law.

Free Speech Under Siege: The Deadly Price of Criticizing Islam A Total Collapse In Its Entire 1,400 Years In World History Today.

https://stophindudvesha.org/free-speech-under-siege-the-deadly-price-of-criticizing-islam/

Throughout history, those who have criticized or questioned Islamic beliefs have often faced serious repercussions, including threats, violence, or even assassination. This ongoing suppression raises important concerns about free speech, personal safety, and the expanding influence of ideological extremism.

Yes Most Muslim's And Far Left America And Pedophile's Love Sharia Law And It Is Better Than The American Following It Own U.S.A. Laws. It's Because The Age Of Consent To Get Married Is 6 Yrs. Old & Age To Have Sexual Intercourse With A Child Is 9 Yrs. Old Period And The Child Said About It? (You Promised Me A Happy Meal) As The Child Is Crying After Being Rape By Ten Men Daily... So This Is How It Will Work In America For Both Side Today. So All America Remember This That Islam Is A Religion Peace And Raping Gangs Is Cum-ing To A America City Near You Soon In 2026... Islam Has Officially Taken Over The People's Republic Of New York City-State Is Under Sharia Laws. ps. Remember In Islam Its not called raping a child... Its having sex with a slave or a concubine Under Islamic & Sharia Law.

Praise Be To Allah, And Blessings And Peace Be Upon The Messenger Of Allah: Quran 5:38, Which States: "As for a man or woman who commits theft, cut off the hands of both to recompense them for what they earned, a deterrent from Allah. And Allah is Mighty, Wise". P.S. So To All The Muslin Peoples We Want You To Follow Your Own Laws And (Cut Off The Hand Of All The Person Who Did This Welfare Fraud & Raping Teens & Sex Slave & Rape Gangs Etc... Per Quran 5:38 Under Islamic And Sharia Laws Now).

The True Islam’s Hidden History And True Petra Theory And True Sacred City A Full Documentary - https://rumble.com/v6z9ntk-the-true-islams-hidden-history-and-true-petra-theory-and-true-sacred-city-a.html

The "Petra Theory," popularized by Canadian author and historian Dan Gibson in his documentary The Sacred City, posits that the original holy city of Islam was not Mecca in Saudi Arabia, but Petra in Jordan. Gibson argues that the first revelations of the Qur’an occurred in Petra, and that the early Muslim community, including the Prophet Muhammad, fled from there to Medina, with Mecca being established later during the Second Fitna (2nd Civil War).According to this theory, the Kaaba and the Black Stone were originally located in Petra, and the Black Stone was later moved to Mecca for safekeeping during the Umayyad campaigns.

A Central piece of evidence cited by Gibson is the orientation of early mosques. He claims that an analysis of over 200 mosques built between 622 and 922 AD shows that all 17 mosques constructed within the first 35 years of Islam (622–657 AD) faced Petra, Jordan, rather than Mecca. This pattern of orientation shifted over time, with a period of confusion from 657 to 747 AD, and by 872 AD, all mosques were built facing Mecca.

This shift is interpreted by Gibson as evidence that the religious focus moved from Petra to Mecca after the initial period of Islam. So Now Per Islamic Qur’an Teaching 1.8 Billion Muslim Are Praying 5 Times A Day Now Facing The Wrong Way Today... Why Is This Happening Today And Why Muslim's Are Not Following The True Teaching Of Muhammad Commanded That All Muslim's To Praying 5 Times A Day 1,400 Yrs. Ago Facing Petra In Jordan, Rather Than Not In Mecca Today.?

Dedication - https://al-islam.org/printpdf/book/export/html/121392

Truth about Agenda U.N. 21 and Plan to Control and Enslave the New World Order - https://rumble.com/v2ak54g-truth-about-agenda-u.n.-21-and-plan-to-control-and-enslave-the-new-world-or.html

Brief Outline Of The New World Order Plan UN Agenda 21 - https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf

U.S.A. Abandoned $85 Billions in Military Equipment in Afghanistan government and now sold all over Muslim world now to Jihad, Hamas, Khilafah, Isis, Islamic State Freedom Fighters Millions 2 Die Soon With Abandoned Weapons And Munitions Billions In Military Equipment.

Millions To Die In Middle East Now From 85 Billion Worth U.S.A. Military Equipment - https://rumble.com/v3ob59z-millions-to-die-in-middle-east-now-from-85-billion-worth-u.s.a.-military-eq.html

And Now 16 Billion Worth Of This Equipment Is Now In The Islamic State And Is Now In Muslim Hands All A Cross The 50 State In U.S.A. Today?

https://extremism.gwu.edu/sites/g/files/zaxdzs5746/files/IslamistHomophobiaintheWest090722.pdf

#13. The Urgent Fight Against Blasphemy Laws

Abolish Blasphemy Laws Statement by Ex-Muslims International

We must abolish blasphemy laws, Now!

They are archaic, oppressive, and designed to silence, punish, and kill those who dare to think freely. These laws are not about respect for the religious; they are a weapon used by theocratic regimes and extremist mobs to crush dissent, erase minority voices, and terrorize those who challenge religious dogma. In Iran, Pakistan, and beyond, people are languishing in prison cells, awaiting execution, or being lynched in the streets—just for speaking their minds or thinking differently.

Blasphemy Laws Are a Death Sentence for Free Thought

The right to question, challenge, and criticize the taboo and sacred is the foundation of freedom of expression and conscience. Yet, in many countries, daring to express an opinion outside religious orthodoxy is met with death sentences and mob violence:

Yousef Mehrdad and Sadrollah Fazeli Zarewere executed in Iran for promoting “atheism and insulting religious and Islamic sanctities.” Also, Mohammad Amin Mahdavi Shayesteh has been sentenced to death for “insulting Islamic sanctities.”

Four people have been sentenced to death in Pakistan for social media posts deemed “offensive.” Also, a mob claimed doctor Shah Nawaz insulted Muhammad, Islam’s prophet, and demanded his arrest. Whilst in custody, police orchestrated his killing.
These are not isolated incidents but part of a brutal system that thrives on fear and suppression.

This is state-backed terrorism, using violence for ideological and political goals, masquerading as justice. The death penalty for blasphemy is applicable outside of theocracies as in the recent assassination of Salwan Momika in Sweden by most likely a “foreign power.”

Make no mistake—these laws do not “protect” the religious. Many believers are also targeted by blasphemy laws. Also, religion, like any other idea, cannot be “protected,” it must be open to criticism and dissent, even when the dissent is deemed unpalatable, such as in Quran burning. Calls for blasphemy laws in Europe, such as in Sweden and the UK only further embolden the religious-Right, including those who carried out the murder of Samuel Paty, the Charlie Hebdo attack, and the threats against the Batley Grammar School teacher, who remains in hiding to this day.

The apology by the mother of an autistic boy in Wakefield after he accidentally dropped a Quran is another example of blasphemy hysteria, thanks to years of appeasement policies towards religion and the religious-Right in contravention of fundamental human rights.

#14. Islamic Justifications for the Death Penalty for Apostasy and Blasphemy

While the Quran does not explicitly prescribe execution for apostasy or blasphemy, classical Islamic jurisprudence and Hadith (sayings of Prophet Muhammad) have been used to justify capital punishment for those who leave or criticize Islam.

Quranic verses include:
Surah Al-Baqarah (2:217): “And whoever among you reverts from his religion and dies while he is a disbeliever – for those, their deeds have become worthless in this world and the Hereafter…”

Surah Al-Ma’idah (5:33): “Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger… is none but that they be killed or crucified…”

Surah An-Nisa (4:88-89): “But if they turn away, then seize them and kill them wherever you find them…”

Examples of Hadith include:
Sahih Bukhari (9:83:17): “The blood of a Muslim cannot be shed except in three cases: … the one who reverts from Islam and leaves the community.”

Sunan Abu Dawood (4:4340): “The Messenger of Allah said: ‘Whoever changes his religion, kill him.’”

Sahih Muslim (3:4131): Ali, the fourth caliph, executed a man for leaving Islam, saying the Prophet instructed it.

Sunan Abu Dawood (38:4348): “A blind man’s slave-mother used to abuse the Prophet. He killed her. The Prophet said: ‘Her blood is permissible.’”

Sahih Bukhari (5:59:369): “A man said: ‘O Allah’s Messenger! What about those who insult you?’ The Prophet replied: ‘Kill them.’”
These texts are the foundation of modern blasphemy laws in countries like Pakistan, Iran, and Saudi Arabia, where people are imprisoned or executed for questioning religion.

Religions are ideologies not sentient beings and do not warrant human rights. Human rights are for people, not religions and beliefs. The separation of religion from the state (Laicite) is a matter of life and death for those accused of blasphemy and apostasy and a minimum precondition for the respect of the rights to expression and conscience.

Jihadi Grape Are Teenage UK Or American Girl Muslim Grooming Gangs Criminality Filthy Ideology - https://rumble.com/v724328-jihadi-grape-are-teenage-uk-or-american-girl-muslim-grooming-gangs-criminal.html

UK grooming gangs are working full time with tens of thousands minor girls as young as 9 ears old were groomed, raped, beaten, and killed ? be-heading by millions Muslim predators across thousands cities all over the world as authorities turned a blind eye to everything now.

Islam is Not a Religion of Peace or The Truth About Islamophobia and Sharia Laws - https://rumble.com/v2gegm4-islam-is-not-a-religion-of-peace-or-the-truth-about-islamophobia-and-sharia.html

https://web.archive.org/web/20150703113256/http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/023-violence.htm

Truth About Islam Laws In USA All Death Penalty For Violations Today. So Why Are All Or Most Muslim So Dishonest In America Today And All Muslim In U.S.A. Need To Go Home Now Today? Tens Of Millions Live On Welfare Fraud, Sex Slave, Gang Raping* Terror Groups And Lying On Immigration Forms Etc. Etc.

The Idea That Muslim Women Cannot Work At All Under Islamic Laws Is Correct. Stealing and being dishonest are closely related behaviors that both involve a breach of trust and societal norms, often stemming from similar psychological and moral motivations. Quran 5:38, which states: "As for a man or woman who commits theft, cut off the hands of both to recompense them for what they earned, a deterrent from Allah. And Allah is Mighty, Wise". Thank You !

P.S. So To All The Muslin Peoples We Want You To Follow Your Own Laws And (Cut Off The Hand Of All The Person Who Did This Welfare Fraud... Per Quran 5:38 Under Islamic And Sharia Laws Now Today).

https://al-islam.org/printpdf/book/export/html/121392

Islam’s Biggest Problem Is? What Is The Islamic Dilemma? Its Own Jesus* Either Way, Islam Is False? -https://rumble.com/v72cxf6-islams-biggest-problem-is-what-is-the-islamic-dilemma-its-own-jesus-either-.html

Real Parallel Worlds Today - NAZI vs U.S.A. - COVID-19 - ANTIFA - SS vs FBI vs DEATH -https://rumble.com/v3g2oan-real-parallel-worlds-today-nazi-vs-u.s.a.-covid-19-antifa-ss-vs-fbi-vs-deat.html

World Economic Forum Great Reset Medical Tyranny, Woke Culture, Green Agenda -https://rumble.com/v3jfm06-world-economic-forum-great-reset-medical-tyranny-woke-culture-green-agenda.html

Yes The New World Order Year Zero... Its For The Greater Good, Greater Good, Greater Good, And God Bless You ALL... Yes Its For The Greater Good In 2026.

We at this channel would like to add this quote for everyone to open your own mind this year: Your body diet is not only what you eat. It is also what you watch, what you listen to, what you read, the people you hang out with and the things you subject your mind, body and soul too. Always be mindful of the things you put into your body emotionally, spiritually and physically. Thank You Everyone Who Watch Our 1162+ Video's To Help Other In 2026.

Show less