Tucker Carlson ⚡Be skeptical of the Charlie Kirk Assassination Investigation

Tucker Carlson announces we should be skeptical of the Charlie Kirk assassination investigation

This isn’t because her doesn’t trust Kash Patel or Dan Bongino, he does. This is because the FBI bureaucracy goes against leadership and hides things

“I’ve known Dan Bongino for a long time, for example, and I like Dan. I don’t for a second imagine he would ever intentionally cover up the murder of someone. I simply don’t believe that.

But Dan Bongino and Kash Patel, for that matter are at the top of the org chart now. The FBI is a massive organization, and parts of it routinely act independently of leadership. That’s the nature of bureaucracy.

So saying “I like Dan Bongino and don’t think he would deliberately would do anything wrong” (which is exactly how I feel) doesn’t mean I automatically trust the entire FBI. And why on earth would I?

If there’s one clear lesson from the 2024 election, it’s that many of our largest institutions are rotten and in desperate need of reform. And as if we needed more proof, we’ve now learned what many of us suspected for years: January 6 was, in effect, a setup, and the FBI played a key role in that setup. To this day, it’s still not clear that everyone involved in orchestrating it has been fired or held accountable.

No American is under any moral obligation to believe everything the government tells them especially not agencies with a long, factually documented track record of committing crimes, illegally meddling in our political system, manufacturing crimes, entrapping people, and distorting justice. That is the precise opposite of the FBI’s job. Its actual job is to pursue justice through facts and then transparently show the rest of us how it arrived at its conclusions, so we can be confident the right people are being punished.

We are not required to accept “trust us” as an answer. Of course we shouldn’t invent conspiracy theories to discredit the FBI, but it’s also isn’t enough for government officials to simply declare, “This is the truth.” We have every right probably an obligation to respond, “Prove it.” And if they can’t or won’t, we are under no duty to believe them.

That’s why one thing bothers me more than anything else about the current debate surrounding the Charlie Kirk investigation: in all the arguing over what happened, we risk letting our largest federal law enforcement agency off the hook. It is the FBI’s job to find out what happened and to tell the rest of us not to hide behind “national security” or anonymous “sources.”

Their job is to show us what happened and convince us with evidence. Anything less is unacceptable, and we should never settle for it.”

“I love Charlie and I want justice to be done in this case, but the rest of us should remain skeptical. We have a duty to remain skeptical and we should not be ashamed of our skepticism”

*Fair Use Statement:
"This content is provided for informational, educational, and/or news reporting purposes under the principles of fair use as outlined in Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act. The material used here is intended for commentary, criticism, research, or teaching, and is not meant to infringe upon the rights of the original copyright holder."

h/t
https://x.com/WallStreetApes/status/1998854059185574134?s=20