No, America Doesn’t Have to Take Millions from the Third World

This segment tackles one of the most controversial debates in U.S. politics: whether America is obligated to accept millions of migrants from the developing world.

The argument stresses that America has no inherent duty to absorb mass migration from the Third World.

Critics of open‑border policies argue that unchecked migration strains housing, healthcare, education, and wages, making affordability worse for working families.

Supporters of stricter immigration controls say the U.S. must prioritize sovereignty, security, and economic stability over globalist expectations.

The discussion frames immigration as not just a humanitarian issue but a fundamental question of national interest and responsibility.

The takeaway: America doesn’t have to take millions from the Third World — the debate is about sovereignty, affordability, and the future of U.S. policy.