Affidavit: Charges & Bill of Complaint vs. American Bar Association.

Andrew Hamilton Pritchard, American Man, delivers his Statement of Truth against the American Bar Association, the "ENEMY", for America's homeowners. Restitution - Bill of Complaint December 10, 2025: Total $6,264,510,000,000.00

American Bar Association
c/o President Michelle A. Behnke
1050 Connecticut Ave. N.W., Suite 400
Washington, D.C. 20036

Date: December 11, 2025
Dear President Michelle A. Behnke,

AFFIDAVIT: STATEMENT OF TRUTH

Subject: American Bar Association (ABA) and Connecticut Bar Association (CBA) weaponized the US Judicial Branch from top to bottom executing upon “We the People” of America through pirated power affirmed by “ENEMY” Courts [Title 50 U.S. Code § 2204 – Definitions “ENEMY”, Title 18 U.S. Code 2441 War Crimes].

I, Andrew Hamilton Pritchard, Sui Juris, Living American, Beneficiary in Equity-Executor of 9 Sylvester Court, Norwalk, Connecticut delivers my testimony, so help me God.
To validate my claims, I will use “Foreclosure” which requires a “Trial by Jury” to demonstrate the weaponized attack on our property, freedom, and America.

1) The American Bar Association (ABA) and Connecticut Bar Association (CBA), the “ENEMY” of complicit Judges and Attorneys, are in control of our legal system; and thus, control our country.
CONGRESS HAS NEVER GIVEN RIGHTS TO THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION, NEVER (source aanl.net).
“It’s just a club with restricted membership. The only legal rights it has have been stolen from the other 325 million of us.
The United States Department of Education recognizes the Council of the ABA Section on Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar as a professional accrediting agency for law schools in the U.S. American law schools that are accredited by the council are termed “approved” by the ABA. That’s it for their authority.”
THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION IS NOTHING MORE THAN A CLUB WITH MEMBERSHIP RESTRICTED TO LAWYERS (source aanl.net)
“The ABA was founded on August 21, 1878 (89 years after self-representation rights were established by Congress. It was founded by 75 lawyers from 20 states and the District of Columbia.
According to the ABA website: The American Bar Association (ABA) is a voluntary bar association of lawyers and law students; it is not specific to any jurisdiction in the United States. The ABA’s stated activities are:
1. the setting of academic standards for law schools, and
2. the formulation of model ethical codes related to the legal profession.”
VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW (11 Va. L. Rev. 264 1924-1925)
THE LAWYER AS AN OFFICER OF THE COURT
Again, it is to be borne in mind that the judges are selected from the ranks of lawyers. The purity of the Bench depends upon the purity of the Bar.
"The very fact, then, that one of the co-ordinate departments, of the government is administered by men selected only from one profession gives to that profession a certain preeminence which calls for a high standard of morals as well as intellectual attainments. The integrity of the judiciary is the safeguard of the nation, but the character of the judges is practically but the character of the lawyers. Like begets like. A degraded Bar will inevitably produce a degraded Bench, and just as certainly may we expect to find the highest excellence in a judiciary drawn from the ranks of an enlightened, learned and moral Bar.” [“WARVELLE, LEGAL ETHICS”]
CONNECTICUT “RACKETEERING” IN THE OPEN BY CHIEF JUSTICE.
Chief Justice of the Connecticut Supreme Court, Chase Rogers (Ret. 2018), established the Bench Bar Foreclosure Committee in October 2007 which enabled "Racketeering" and "Railroading" with no restraints, rogue power.
Here is the issued press release that she was creating a Foreclosure Bench Bar Committee. http://www.jud.ct.gov/external/news/press250.htm
Here is the handpicked first Foreclosure Bench Bar Committee members list that includes judges, attorneys and Judicial Branch employees. Other members include: Judge Salvatore C. Agati; Attorney Ronald M. Bender; Attorney Adam L. Bendett; Attorney Jessica L. Braus; Attorney Denis R. Caron; Attorney Robert F. Frankel; Judge Samuel Freed; Attorney Peggy George; Judge Robert G. Gilligan; Judge Arthur A. Hiller, who is chief administrative judge of civil matters; Ms. Catherine Lapolla; Attorney Leanne M. Larson; Attorney Richard M. Leibert; Attorney Geoffrey Kent Milne; Judge Patty Jenkins Pittman; Judge Richard A. Robinson; Danbury Chief Clerk Therese Servas; Judge Theodore R. Tyma; Attorney Thomas W. Witherspoon; and Attorney Louis C. Zowine.
On the list of handpicked attorneys were the owners and partners of the two largest foreclosure mill law firms at that time Hunt Leibert Jacobson PC and Reiner Reiner and Bendett.
PC1: Attorney Richard Leibert, Attorney Geoffrey Milne and Attorney Adam Bendett.
At the time Justice Rogers chose these attorneys and during their continued tenure on the Foreclosure Bench Bar Committee, the attorney firms have been charged, investigated and settled for running illegal kickback schemes, inducement schemes, double billing schemes and other fraudulent activities.
For instance, at the time Adam Bendett was chosen to sit amongst the Judges armed with the Constitutional Power of deciding foreclosure cases in this State, Reiner, Reiner and Bendett PC was charged, investigated and would eventually settled on December 10, 2007 with the Office of the Attorney General, the Insurance Commissioner and the Department of Consumer Protection of the State of Connecticut for running "Illegal kickback and Inducement Schemes." See link: http://www.ct.gov/cid/lib/cid/Reinerkickbacksettlement.pdf
It should be noted that Foreclosure Bench Bar Committee Member Judge Richard A. Robinson was named Chief Justice upon the retirement of Chief Justice Chase Rogers.
The Judicial Foreclosure Weapon to seize American property is fully operational.
2) The American Bar Association (ABA) and Connecticut Bar Association (CBA), the “ENEMY” of complicit Judges and Attorneys, operate our legal system by the Bench-Bar acting in unity as the “Ultimate Sovereign” with the power of “Ultimate Sanctions”.
VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW (11 Va. L. Rev. 264 1924-1925)
THE LAWYER AS AN OFFICER OF THE COURT
In the field of jurisprudence we find the influence of the legal profession even more strongly felt than in that of legislation, for it is here that the Law receives its practical application to specific cases as they arise in the courts. Speaking of this phase of the subject, Judge Sharswood continues:
"With jurisprudence lawyers have most, nay, all to do. The opinion of the Bar will make itself heard and respected on the Bench. With sound views, their influence for good in this respect may well be said to be incalculable. It is indeed the noblest faculty of the profession to counsel the ignorant, defend the weak and oppressed, and to stand forth on all occasions as the bulwark of private rights against the assaults of power, even under the guise of law; but it has still other functions. It is its office to diffuse sound principles among the people, that they may intelligently exercise the controlling power placed in their hands, in the choice of their representatives in the legislature and of judges, in deciding, as they are often called upon to do, upon the most important changes in the Constitution, and above all, in the formation of that public opinion which may be said in these times, almost without a figure, to be the ultimate sovereign." [" SHARSWOOD, LEGAL ETHICS, 54.”]
CHIEF JUSTICE EDWARD D. WHITE AT THE ANNUAL DINNER OF THE ASSOCIATION, September 5, 1919
“I say, Mr. President, our profession, because although it happens that the line of my duty for many years has been judicial, that fact instead of weakening has strengthened the ties which make me one of the profession and has caused me to feel more and more every day of my life the indispensable unity which makes the Bench and Bar one and indivisible in the accomplishment of the great responsibilities which rest upon them.
Undoubtedly our forefathers sought by the government which they created to save us from the misery and anguish which had, as a necessary consequence, ever resulted from the despotism of the one over the many or the tyranny of the many over the few. To this end their purpose was to make human freedom perpetual by guaranteeing the great rights of life, liberty and property to each and every individual and thus secure those precious blessings to all under the free and representative government which they established. To accomplish these objects the constitutional structure which they erected had a duplex character, national on the one hand and state on the other, each designed to move in its respective sphere of action without interfering with the powers of the other, both being restrained by the fundamental guaranties or prohibitions which were ordained to prevent the abuse of the powers which were recognized or granted and to confine their operation in their appropriate area. Simple and resourceful as were the institutions thus provided, it is apparent that standing alone they are wholly inefficacious because they were without ultimate sanction, that is, without any regulating power having authority to restrain wrongful or mistaken exertions of the powers given, and thereby to prevent the crash and confusion which would necessarily be the consequence of mistake or error in their exercise.
It is, I submit, further not to be doubted that the Fathers, contemplating this situation, determined to provide a remedy for it. Seeking to accomplish that result and bringing into mind the traditions of our race as to the benefactions which had come to it from the wisdom, the courage, the fidelity, the integrity and the restraint by which the law of the land had been administered through lawyers and courts, they made that law as construed and applied by the courts in justiciable controversies the final sanction by which the powers conferred were in the ultimate sense to be tested when called into play. How simple 'and yet how remarkable was the conclusion thus adopted a conclusion which today challenges the admiration of the world and stands virtually as the abiding hope for the protection of individual right and the perpetuation of free government. Yes, my brethren, it must be recognized from what I have said that the American lawyer, from the public point of view, is especially dedicated to the preservation of human liberty and upon him and the faithful discharge of his duties rests the hope of all the ages for its perpetuation. Ah! let us recognize this great truth and let us resolve the more and more as we go about the daily affairs of our lives to carry it in our minds and hearts in order more fully to meet the great responsibilities which rest upon us. Let its consciousness admonish us to put aside the fallacious suggestion that the Constitution has outlived its use fulness, that the country has outgrown the restraints which the Constitution creates, that as individual right is inimical to progress and liberty and a free government, such right should be destroyed, to be replaced by some strange combination of the many to the obliteration of all individual freedom.”
The American Bar Association (ABA) members are the “Ultimate Sovereigns” with the power of “Ultimate Sanctions” and “Final Sanction” because they say so?!
I ask, “Who died and made ABA members King?”
Please note: Property requires a “Trial by Jury”.
The Connecticut Judicial Branch press release below affirms the claims above.
EXTERNAL AFFAIRS DIVISION
231 Capitol Avenue
Hartford, Connecticut 06106
(860) 757-2270, Fax (860) 757-2215
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE October 23, 2007
Quick Links
Chief Justice Rogers Appoints Bench-Bar Foreclosure Committee
Chief Justice Chase T. Rogers announced today that she has appointed a Bench-Bar Foreclosure Committee that will review current practices and practices in the courts regarding foreclosure cases, and make recommendations on ways to improve those procedures and practices.
The Honorable Douglas C. Mintz, Administrative Judge for the Danbury Judicial District, will chair the committee. "The purpose of the committee is to promote cooperation between the bench and the bar in this sensitive area," Judge Mintz said.
'The number of foreclosure cases added in court during the 2005-06 fiscal year totaled 11,764. That number increased to 15,773 for the 2006-07 fiscal year," Chief Justice Rogers said. "Whether this is a trend that will continue remains to be seen, but I believe that our state courts must be as well prepared as possible to process these cases."
The first meeting of the committee will be Thursday, Oct. 25, 2007, at 2 p.m. in the Attorney Conference Room, located in the Supreme Court Building, 231 Capitol Ave, Hartford. The meeting is open to the public.
The “ENEMY’s” Foreclosure War Machine is seizing our property and thus our Freedom with willful disregard to the law and our rights.

3) The Constitution of the American Bar Association (ABA) defines the method of attack on our Constitution for the united states of America, Treason.
American Bar Association (ABA) willfully disregards the Constitution for the united states of America. Fact: The U.S. Constitution is NOT included anywhere in the CONSTITUTION AND BY-LAWS OF THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION, Adopted September 5, 1919.
Effectively, the ABA has Standing Orders to “Procure” Every Law by the Association.
By-Law X:
It shall be the duty of each Vice-President and member of the General Council to endeavor to procure the enactment by the legislature of his state of every law recommended by the Association, and the Secretary shall furnish them with copies of every recommendation and of every bill recommended and a copy of this by-law; and whenever the Association shall by resolution recommend the enactment of any law, the Secretary shall furnish as soon as possible, a copy of the resolution to the President of each State Bar Association, with the request that such Association cooperate with the local vice-president and member of the General Council of this Association and the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws of such state in having a bill introduced in the legislature of its state in conformity with the recommendation of this Association, and use proper means to procure the enactment of the same into law. In every state where there is no State Bar Association, a copy of such resolution, with a similar request, shall be sent to the President of the Bar Association of the principal cities in the state; and in every instance where the form of bill has been recommended, a copy thereof shall also be sent with the resolution.
To put it simply, ABA as ultimate sovereign with ultimate sanction will tell you what laws to make or be sanctioned.
Connecticut’s complicit Judges and Attorneys are at the front of the line telling the legislature what laws to put in place to enable the Foreclosure War Machine to operate more efficiently and faster.
“Perfection” of chain of title or issues of fraud are willfully disregarded by Judges and Attorneys so they can hit their target/objective of seizing the home.
America is attacked every day in every way by the weaponized judicial system.
A Trial by Jury verdict is law.
The “ENEMY” knows this, avoids this, and assaults us with “Opinions”.
The “ENEMY” commits fraud everyday as Attorneys claim to have a law license; claim they are officers of the court; and fraudulently represent “Attorney-Client” privilege that does not exist.
Maxim of Law – “Fraud vitiates everything.”
The Supreme Law of the United States of America states unambiguously, “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government and shall protect each of them against Invasion.” Art 4, Sec 4, U S Constitution.
The obvious and most basic violations of Human and Constitutional Rights result in extraordinary irreparable harm and death to so many Americans and people of the world.
Personally, my home of twenty-nine years was seized by a planned Police Military raid by over 50+ Complicit Officers without claim (Federal Reserve Act Sec.13-13), proper appearance of Plaintiff, or compensation; and fraudulent charges for trespassing with twenty-five years of jail time (Default past due).
All above about Foreclosure is just one of the targets of the “ENEMY” Judicial War Machine.
The horrors executed by the “ENEMY” in Probate Court, Child Protective Services, Guardianship, and anywhere justice of the is required is beyond comprehension!
It is for this reason that I have focused on remedy and restitution in Foreclosure which is administrative in nature to set a floor as to what comes after.
Obviously, the damage and harm done by the Judicial War Machine to those innocents in Probate Court, Child Protective Services, Guardianship, and more are more significant.
Back to Foreclosure, the 2008-2009 Mortgage Crisis Settlement between State Attorney Generals such as current U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal and U.S Attorney General Pamela Bondi was finalized in 2012.
Please remember that every expert came to Washington D.C. in 2009 to testify to Congress about all the fraudulent documents, titles, and unlawful financial applications that they said would take decades to clear up if at all.
Yet, since 2012 the very same fraudulently represented Mortgage is placed with Americans and Foreclosures are executed with military precision and even at times Police Force in a civil matter.
I have used all Mortgages issued since July 2012 to April 2025 as the basis of the financial claim of remedy and restitution for all of America’s homeowners.
Remedy - Charges:
American Bar Association (ABA) and Connecticut Bar Association (CBA) are violating Title 18 U.S. Code 2441 War Crimes; Title 18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy; Title 18 U.S. Code § 2331 – Definitions “Domestic Terrorism”; Title 18 U.S. Code § 2332b - Acts of terrorism transcending national boundaries; Title 18 U.S. Code § 175 - Prohibitions with respect to biological weapons; Title 18 U.S. Code § 1091 – Genocide; Title 18 U.S. Code § 2382 - Misprision of treason; and Title 18 U.S. Code § 2381 – Treason by a weaponized the US Judicial Branch from top to bottom executing upon “We the People” of America through pirated power affirmed by Title 50 U.S. Code § 2204 – Definitions “ENEMY” Courts.
Restitution - Bill of Complaint December 10, 2025:
I, Andrew Hamilton Pritchard, demand the charges above be executed by the proper Authority of “We the People”, and demand Restitution for “American Homeowners” … Total Damages Due: $6,264,510,000,000.00
It is upon “the People” to ensure justice prevails when those in positions of power reveal themselves to be an enemy of those who put their trust in them.
CASE LAW & MAXIMS OF LAW:
Rotella v. Wood et al., 528 U.S. 549 (2000)
"The object of civil RICO is thus not merely to compensate victims but to turn them into prosecutors, "private attorneys general," dedicated to eliminating racketeering activity. 3 Id., at 187 (citing Malley-Duff, 483 U.S., at 151) (civil RICO specifically has a "further purpose [of] encouraging potential private plaintiffs diligently to investigate"). The provision for treble damages is accordingly justified by the expected benefit of suppressing racketeering activity, an object pursued the sooner the better."
Salinas v. United States, 522 U.S. 52, 63,64 (1997)
Conspiracy "A conspiracy may exist even if a conspirator does not agree to commit or facilitate each and every part of the substantive offense."
It is "the common-law principle that, so long as they share a common purpose, conspirators are liable for the acts of their co-conspirators."
Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S. Ct. 1401 (1958)
Note: Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the supreme law of the land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason. The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that "no state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it". See also In Re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (188); U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S. Ct. 471, 66 L. Ed. 2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L. Ed 257 (1821).
Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 US 390 - Supreme Court 1923
Take judicial notice of an adjudicated fact by the Supreme Court, that writ of habeas corpus--may be invoked if the petitioner is free from bodily restraint and thereby the court is prohibited from dismissing this petition on the grounds the petitioner is not a prisoner or jailed.

As to LIBERTY, “While this court has not attempted to define with exactness the liberty thus guaranteed, the term has received much consideration and some of the included things have been definitely stated. Without doubt, it denotes not merely freedom from bodily restraint but also the right of the individual to contract, to engage in any of the common occupations of life, to acquire useful knowledge, to marry, establish a home and bring up children, to worship God according to the dictates of his own conscience, and generally to enjoy those privileges long recognized at common law as essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men.”
Maxim of Law – “The main objective of government is the protection and preservation of personal property, private rights, public liberties and upholding the law of God.” All aspects of “government” at all levels must be fully transparent and fully accountable to the people they swore to protect and serve.
Maxim of Law – “The government is to be subject to the law, for the law makes the government.”
AUTHORITY: As a living-breathing American Man, one of “We the People”, the Owners of Our Government, I, Andrew Hamilton Pritchard, Sui Juris, have the authority to address any felony that I witness firsthand (CGS 54-170 Arrest without Warrant). (King James Version) Galatians 6:7-8, Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap. For he that soweth to his flesh shall of the flesh reap corruption; but he that soweth to the Spirit shall of the Spirit reap life everlasting. Amen.
Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter.
Respectfully,

Andrew Hamilton Pritchard, Sui Juris
Living American
Beneficiary in Equity-Executor
9 Sylvester Court
Norwalk, Connecticut
Phone: (203)858-7949
Email: [email protected]

Tracking numbers for Certified Mail:
9589 0710 5270 3283 8244 07 American Bar Association President
9589 0710 5270 3283 8243 91 Connecticut Bar Association President
9589 0710 5270 3283 8244 14 Solicitor General of the U.S.