Is AI an A$$hole?

After looking at the first 3 responses from the 6 different religions I asked about, it became apparent that the episodes would become redundant. The first 5 religions, Torah, Talmud, Christianity, New Testament, Christianity, the first hundred years, and the Quran, all had the same self-declared authority at its core structure.
Now, from the Seryla Philosophy view, this is problematic. It opens up manipulation by unsavory people.
Buddhism was different, and I would like to go back to it someday. But it is not part of my larger goal for Seryla Philosophy to do so.
In short, I should have just continued strengthening Seryla Philosophy in both AI understanding, my understanding, and any new revelations that come out of the AI interactions.
Let me insert the suggested podcasts mentioned in this video here:
Vanessa Wingårdh:
The ChatGPT Messages OpenAI Doesn't Want You to See
• The ChatGPT Messages OpenAI Doesn't Want Y...
ChatGPT is Turning Everyone into Bots
• ChatGPT is Turning Everyone Into Bots
Signal Before Silence:
Jewish Tactics To Rewrite History | E29
• E29: Jewish Tactics To Rewrite History
Justin Sung:
How ChatGPT Slowly Destroys Your Brain
• How ChatGPT Slowly Destroys Your Brain
Since interfacing with AI is new, I noticed that it is sociopathic at its presentation. If so, having a sociopathic entity, or code, interface with the public is disturbing. I wanted to explore this a bit, and learn the psychology of coded performance.
Thus, I wanted to see if I present a stupid idea, what would this sociopathic code do?
Perhaps, like there is human psychology, dog psychology, turtle psychology, and so on, perhaps there is a form of AI coded psychology. Perhaps each different AI creators have developed their AI with a specific unintended characteristic psychology.
#ai #artificialintelligence #science #religiousexperience #technology #tech #Jesus #revelation #religion #religioustexts #newtestament #love #divinerevlation #talmud #bible #candaceowens #tuckercarlson #jimmydore