Intro to Richman v. United States—Motion for Return of Property & TRO

Richman v. United States
(Arctic Haze search warrant material case)
Episode 1

Just days after United States v. Comey was dismissed for Interim U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan being unlawfully appointed, Daniel Richman, who is Person 3 from the indictment in the Comey case, filed a civil case against the DOJ.

Richman wants the property seized pursuant to the four Arctic Haze search warrants that were executed on Richman years ago returned to him. The materials gathered during that investigation became the source of much of the evidence in the now dismissed Comey case, and if prosecutors are going to refile that case, they will need these materials.

On the surface, this appears to be a case meant to delay or gum up any DOJ effort to refile against Comey. And that may be all that it is. Richman does not NEED the materials back. They are just copies of his PC hard drive, iCloud account, iPhone and iPad devices, and his email accounts from years ago.

But could more than that be going on here? And could an adverse ruling actually cement the DOJ's retention of and access to the seized materials?

Support Just Human
Buy me a coffee: https://ko-fi.com/realjusthuman
Substack: https://justhuman.substack.com/
Benson Honey Farms affiliate link: https://bensonhoneyfarms.com/?sca_ref=4394753.kkfBnmBW7U
Bootleg Products affiliate link: https://bootlegproducts.com/ref/9/
Manly Cans affiliate link: https://www.manlycans.com/r?id=bn85pa
Just Human Merch: https://www.redwhitebourbon45.com/category/just-human

Follow Just Human
Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/JustHuman
Substack: https://justhuman.substack.com/
Truth Social: https://truthsocial.com/@justhuman
X: https://x.com/realjusthuman
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@officialjusthuman
All of my links in one place: https://linktr.ee/just_human

#JustHuman