There is no way he is this stupid

Leaflit reacts to @SecretScholars : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fBgnWQJs_EE

NEW ALBUM: https://distrokid.com/hyperfollow/leaflit/beep-boop-weeaboop-2/

Support me ♥ https://www.patreon.com/leaflit
Watch me ♥ https://www.twitch.tv/Leaflit
Kick me ♥ https://www.kick.com/Leaflit
Follow me ♥ https://twitter.com/Leaflit
See me ♥ https://www.tiktok.com/@leaflitvt
Discord ♥ https://discord.com/invite/leaflit
TTRPG ♥ https://rpg.angelssword.com/
MERCH ♥ https://shop.angelssword.com/

Hey everyone — it’s Leaflit! In this video I’m reacting to Warren Smith’s video “Professor EXPOSES Pretentious Leftist Star in Front of His Own Audience”, where a professor visiting Vaush’s stream absolutely dismantles one of his arguments about gender and reality by grounding it in basic, undeniable facts — like water being H₂O, even before we knew chemistry.

Vaush responds with something that sounds ridiculous — claiming in response that “in Mexico it’s Aqua” — as if translating a word changes the actual nature of the thing itself. That’s not just a silly misstep — it’s a refusal to accept simple reality and a sign of intellectual laziness instead of honest debate.

Here’s how I see it:

I’m critical of Vaush. When a professor brings real, scientific reality — like how water exists as H₂O regardless of our words for it — and someone replies with a translation joke instead of engaging the point, that’s not debate — that’s distraction. It shows Vaush was more interested in rhetoric than the actual substance of the argument.

I’m supportive of the professor. He didn’t get flustered, he didn’t dodge the issue, and he didn’t fall for rhetorical games. He brought clarity and logic to a topic that often gets muddled by emotion or ideology. That’s how honest discussions should go — grounded in reality first, not slogans.

Debate culture often gets lost in clever phrasing or identity points, but facts like water’s molecular structure aren’t opinions — they’re the foundation of reality. When someone refuses to acknowledge that in a serious discussion, it undermines the whole point of having a debate in the first place.

If you think argument should follow logic and reality — not confuse listeners with word games — hit Like, Subscribe, and ring the bell. Then tell me in the comments: Have you ever seen a moment in a debate where someone clearly lost the logic — and what was the impact?

Vaush debate reaction, water H2O debate, Warren Smith clip reaction, Vaush exposed by professor, leaflit reacts logic vs rhetoric, gender debate fiasco, stupid argument moment, critic of rhetorical tricks, support for honest debate, Vaush reaction video, debate logic critique, professor exposes Vaush, water is H₂O reality, word vs reality debate, Warren Smith reaction, critical thinking discussion, flawed argument reaction, Leaflit commentary, Vaush gets schooled reaction, leaflit on ridiculous debate lines, H2O vs “Aqua” moment, professor logic wins debate, gender discussion breakdown

If you are the owner of the original video and you want this video removed, please contact: [email protected]

#gaming #vtuber #reaction