Before disciplinary proceedings. Before tribunals. Before years of unresolved investigations. There was a healthcare worker speaking out in real time. This video documents the sequence that often follows when healthcare professionals raise concerns about policy, patient safety, or ethics. It is not a verdict on beliefs. It is not a finding of guilt. It is an examination of process, power, and consequence. When public speech leads to scrutiny, and scrutiny escalates into regulatory proceedings, the sequence itself does not imply wrongdoing. Yet under administrative law, the process can become the punishment. This documentary explores: • How regulatory systems operate under administrative law • The imbalance between publicly funded enforcement and personal legal cost • The chilling effect prolonged proceedings have on informed consent and patient advocacy • Why silence, not safety, becomes the outcome You do not have to agree with every statement made to recognize a structural problem. When oversight shifts from protecting patients to enforcing compliance, patient rights are quietly eroded. Taxpayers should ask a simple question: Are public resources being used to protect patients — or to silence dissent? ⸻ 🔗 SUPPORT & CONTACT Website: https://www.sarah4freedom.com/ Interac E-Transfer: 📧 [email protected] Social Media: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/sarah.choujounian/ X (Twitter): https://x.com/sarahchoujounia ⸻ This is the Canadian Citizens Journal.