Is Homology Evidence for Evolution?

Is homology due to common descent or common design? Is descent with modification overwhelmingly obvious? The standard definition of homology is the similarity of the structure, physiology, or development of different species of organisms based upon their descent from a common evolutionary ancestor- the structural identity of parts in distinct species such as the human hand, the wing of a bird, and the flipper of a seal. But is this really the case?

The answer: “Homology can’t be used as evidence for evolution because it assumes the very thing it’s trying to prove.” In other words, Homology therefore evolution, evolution therefore homology. “And when biologists try to fix this by pointing to DNA or other areas it only further undermines the case.”

Full EVOLUTION VS. CREATION playlist 👇
https://rumble.com/playlists/XO0fSfj7xbY

Video credit: Discovery Science on YouTube

ALL PLAYLISTS page, where you can find deep-dives on ALL of the most important topics facing our world today 👇
https://rumble.com/user/benwehrman/playlists

🌐 My website, where you can find my blog, podcast, and all other projects focused on bringing awakening content to as many truth-seeking souls as possible:
https://benwehrman.com/

📢⚡️ Join the free speech revolution on NOSTR, the decentralized social media network of the future:
https://rumble.com/playlists/IKTigOwaaQ4

👕🔥 Shop Red Pill Merch - conversation-starting shirts:
https://www.redpillthreads.com/ben