8th Dynamic - OMNI Fundamentals

Theta Flow conference Mikhail Fedorov, the 8th Dynamic and OMNI Fundamentals, 2021

Show more

8th Dynamic – OMNI Fundamentals (Mikhail Fedorov)

International THETA Flow Webinar

(0:00–0:35) Opening and Recording Agreement

Fedorov opens the International CETA Forum session, establishes consent for recording and publishing the webinar, and introduces the lecture topic: The Eighth Dynamic in Scientology.

(0:41–1:19) Definition of the Eighth Dynamic
He compares dictionary definitions:

Russian Scientology Dictionary – Survival through a superior entity or eternity.

English definition – “Superior life beings” as a dynamic.
The Eighth Dynamic is framed as an existing, active dynamic involving higher or superior life forms.

(1:19–2:29) Religious Models of God and Creation
Fedorov reviews how religions define “God”:

Monotheism (Christianity, Judaism, Islam) – One supreme creator.

Polytheism – Multiple gods (Greek, Egyptian, Hindu).
This establishes a comparative framework for understanding “superior beings” in relation to the Eighth Dynamic.

(3:03–4:12) Taoism and the Source Concept
He introduces Tao as:

The origin of all things
The law underlying existence

The non-material spiritual foundation of phenomena
This is positioned as parallel to Scientology’s concept of Source.

(4:15–6:12) Scientology Factors, Static, and Axioms
Fedorov connects Tao to Scientology’s Factors and Axioms:

Factor One – Before the beginning was a cause whose purpose was the creation of effect.

Static – No mass, wavelength, time, or position; complete equilibrium.

Axiom One – Life is a static.

Axiom Two – Static can create, postulate, and consider.

Axiom Three – Space, energy, objects, and time are products of consideration.
Conclusion: All conditions and existence arise from static via postulates and agreements.

(6:20–7:56) Levels of Determination
He defines three states of causation:

Other-determined – Controlled by others.
Self-determined – Controls self.
Pan-determined – Can regulate multiple identities and viewpoints.
This leads into the concept of OMNI as a higher operational condition.

(8:23–10:07) OMNI State (Captain Bill Robertson Definition)
OMNI is described as:

A pan-determined operational state

Agreed upon in the original source condition

Full responsibility for all players and their creations
Ethical use is emphasized: misuse results in loss of Omni access and descent in condition.

(10:33–11:03) Auditing as Ethical OMNI Use
Auditing is framed as pan-determined and ethical application of OMNI:

Used to free players from aberrations and charge

Never to dominate or harm other players

(11:11–12:17) Solo vs. OMNI Processing Model
Fedorov contrasts:

Solo Processing – One thetan addressing own somatic.

OMNI Processing – Extending awareness beyond the MEST universe to the Source Static, engaging all players who created the universe.

(12:20–13:31) Instant As-Is and Healing Mechanism
With “10 to the 40th degree players” viewing a somatic:

The condition is as-ised instantly

This parallels religious accounts of instant healing
Justification is tied directly to Axiom Three.

(13:47–14:36) Ethical Application of OMNI
OMNI is presented as a tool for:

Disappearance of mental mass and aberration

Easing original intentions that created conditions

(14:41–16:24) Safety, Egregores, and Misuse Warnings
Questions addressed:

True OMNI involves pure static, not entities within the universe

Contacting internal “higher players” or composites leads to underdetermination

Proper OMNI has no wavelength, no mass, pure theta

(16:48–17:55) Responsibility and Accessibility
OMNI is described as a fuse for every player:

Anyone can use it ethically to exit aberration

Ethical use improves the game without harming others

(19:27–20:29) Clearing Formulas Compared
Three models:

Dual Processing: PC + Auditor > Bank

Solo Processing: Pre-OT + C/S > Bank

OMNI Processing: PC + OMNI State + Tech > Bank
OMNI allows self-clearing using recorded or written tech.

(20:32–21:43) Concept and Understanding
Defines concept as:

Thought without symbols or pictures

Direct knowing rather than representation
Uses smartphones as a modern example of conceptual understanding vs. mechanical knowledge.

(21:46–22:55) Tone 40 and Concept Transmission
Tone 40 is defined as absolute postulate with no counter-intention.
OMNI communication is done by:

Sending conceptual intention, not words or symbols

Direct theta projection

(23:01–24:57) TRs, Faith, and the Eighth Dynamic
TR0 is linked to approaching static presence.
Christian faith is reframed as Tone 40 postulation.
Scientology is presented as restoring lost Eighth Dynamic technology.

(25:07–26:18) Three OMNI Processes Introduced
OMNI As-Is of Mental Mass

OMNI Ideal Duplication (exact copy to discharge mass)

Restoration of Heaviness (to rebalance the body after mass loss)

(26:21–27:15) Definitions: Mental Mass, MISEmotion, Charge
Mental Mass – Weight and form in mental image pictures

MISEmotion – Anger, fear, grief, apathy, antagonism

Charge – Harmful stored energy in the reactive mind

(27:20–28:14) OMNI As-Is Procedure
Steps:

Find the charge
Enter OMNI state
Exert Tone 40 intention
As-is the condition

(27:34–28:14) OMNI Entry Drill
Guided expansion:
Earth → Solar System → Galaxy → Mass Universe → Source Static

(28:18–29:14) Practical Application
Participants locate a somatic or mental mass, define it, and send Tone 40 conceptual intention to Omni statics to as-is it, layer by layer.

(29:15–29:59) Participant Feedback
Attendees report recognition points and partial discharge, discussing initial successes and challenges in contacting the Omni state.

(30:14–30:59) First-Hand Reports of Omni State
Participants describe entering Omni-condition as:

Loss of mass, location, volume, and human sensory reference

A feeling of nothing and everything simultaneously

Contact with static as infinite potential or a “field of potential”
This is aligned with Scientology’s definition of Static: no mass, no wavelength, no time, no location.

(31:02–31:38) Validation of Static Experience
Fedorov confirms commonality of reports:
“Being nothing and everything at the same time”

Dissolving existence into present-time static and theta
This frames Omni as present-time as-isness, not a distant or mystical condition.

(31:52–32:44) Training to Extend into Omniscience
He presents Omni access as a trainable ability, comparable to building a muscle:

Static is not “out there”—it is here and now

The being is static and can feel its high-frequency presence

Static exists everywhere and nowhere in the MEST universe

(32:47–33:01) Gradient Requirement and Case Readiness
Warning is given:

If a person cannot feel or contact static, Omni access may be difficult

Proper gradients and preparatory work are sometimes necessary

(33:09–34:10) Two-Point Expansion Drill (LRH Reference)
A classic space-extension process is presented:

Hold two points in a room

Extend them beyond walls → across the city → across the planet → between planets → between stars
Purpose: Break mass-universe fixation and approach the edge of MEST to reach Omni-state.

(34:19–34:41) Meditation-Based Gradient
Alternative path using meditative practices:

Attention placed into Earth

Extended upward through chakras

Moved outward beyond the layers of the universe
This is framed as another route to Omni contact.

(34:48–35:30) Beginner Gradient and Mock-Up Drills
Beginners are advised to:

Start with small objects (e.g., a flower)

Mock up and un-mock repeatedly

Progress to larger creations
This follows LRH’s gradient scale principle for increasing causation.

(35:33–36:32) Missemotion Omni Process
Live exercise:

Locate a missemotion in the body
Define its location, shape, and boundaries
Enter Omni-state

Apply Tone 40 intention to as-is the condition
Result: Chains erased in seconds instead of standard session length

(36:46–37:00) Development Origin of Omni Tech
Clarification:

Not part of OT Levels

Developed by Captain Bill Robertson after LRH’s death

Used in other spiritual systems, recently adopted in Scientology Freezone circles

(37:13–38:12) Havingness and Static Effects

Discussion of mental mass loss:

Without havingness, PCs can feel discomfort

Physical signs reported: yawning, somatic relief, emotional neutrality
Static experience is described as knowingness without emotion.

(38:26–39:43) Defining Mental Mass
Mental mass includes:
Somatics and misemotion
Mental image pictures and “screens”

Any unpleasant or uncomfortable condition
Everything that is not the “perfect you” is categorized as reactive mind content and workable via Omni-processing.

(39:50–40:18) Omni vs. Exteriorization
Distinction made:

Exteriorization – The thetan leaving the body by a distance

Omni-state – Going beyond the universe to contact Source Static
Defined as the maximum degree of exteriorization

(41:01–41:42) Case Accessibility and Bridge Position
Fedorov states:
Any level on the Bridge can access Omni
Some beings require TRs and Objectives first
Omni use is a natural right of a thetan

(41:56–43:31) ARC Break Handling via Omni
ARC breaks are identified as heaviest charge.
Process:

Find a disappointment with self
Define the mental mass
Enter Omni-state

Direct static attention to as-is it
Warning: Do not restimulate if Omni cannot be reached, as this can worsen the case.

(43:45–44:56) Earliest Disappointment Chain
Participants are guided to:
Locate earliest childhood disappointment
Define mass shape and location
Apply Tone 40 Omni intention
Wins reported include visualized “holes” closing and emotional discharge

(46:29–48:37) Second Dynamic Processing (Partners)
Omni applied to:

Disappointments with partners

Current → earlier → earliest incidents
Each mass is located, viewed from Omni, and as-ised.

(48:38–50:47) Second Dynamic Processing (Children)
Extension of process to:

Disappointments regarding children or lack of children

Case layers acknowledged—multiple strata may appear beneath initial discharge
Participants are instructed to continue Omniing layer by layer

(51:35–52:37) Rights and Case Stability
Fedorov emphasizes:

Omni use is permitted at any bridge level

Rapid mass loss can cause disorientation due to loss of “stable data”
This explains temporary confusion after big wins.

(53:09–54:07) Cognitions and Engram Chains
Cognitions arise because:

Mental mass is a chain of engrams

Erasing the chain produces multiple realizations
Big wins should be followed by rest and enjoyment, not overrun.

(54:18–55:19) Ethical Use on Others
Caution given:
Working on others’ cases can pull their aberrations into your own

Best practice is to teach them Omni-state, not handle their case directly
Consent and respect for beingness rights are emphasized.

(56:31–57:48) Disappointment with Scientology
Process applied to:

Disappointments with Scientology, auditors, ethics, or terminals
Participants locate and as-is these charges using Omni.

(58:58–59:21) Axiom 20 – Perfect Duplication
Axiom introduced:

Bringing the static to create a perfect duplicate causes the vanishment of any existence or part thereof.
Explanation: Two objects in the same space and time cause disappearance via perfect duplication.

(59:29–59:55) Axiom 20 Omni Process
Procedure:

Enter Omni-state
Locate an unwanted or fixed mental mass
Mock it up in the same space and time
Allow vanishment through perfect duplication

(1:00:00–1:01:21) Axiom 20 Drill – Perfect Duplication in Practice
Participants are guided to:

Locate a mental mass to be vanished
Define its size, shape, and boundaries
Extend awareness to the Omni-state

Intend for Omni to create an exact duplicate in the same space and time
This operationalizes Axiom 20: perfect duplication leads to vanishment.

(1:01:22–1:02:08) Emotion as Mass Recognition
Clarification that misemotion and sensations are also mental mass:

Not limited to physical somatics

Participants may mock up current stomach sensations or emotional charge as workable mass

(1:02:15–1:02:59) Participant Wins and Discharge Reports
Attendees report:

Clearing of residual mass from prior auditing cycles
Resolution of second dynamic material
Recognition of Omni as a rapid and practical clearing tool

(1:03:02–1:04:15) Omni-Havingness Process Introduced
Final process of the session:

Enter Omni-state
Create an incoming flow of energy from Source into the body and surrounding space
Fill with what the body needs to live and function optimally
Parallels drawn to:

Eastern practices (“fill with goodness”)
Christian imagery (Holy Spirit descent)

(1:04:22–1:05:49) Restoration and Havingness Feedback
Participants report:

Restoration of bodily essence and form
Feelings of wholeness, goodness, and healing
Sensations of coolness, power, and lightness
TA drops and case relaxation are noted.

(1:05:52–1:06:31) C/S for Self-Clearing – When to Stop
Guidelines for session end-point:

Stop when feeling serene, playful, or energetically “in the game”

If condition worsens, take it into Omni processing immediately
Positioned as a Case Supervisor model for solo Omni auditing

(1:06:40–1:07:22) Layered Case Structure (“Cabbage Model”)
Case is described as:

Multiple layers of mental mass

Some vanish instantly; others require repeated inspection
Another layer appearing means processing is working, not failing.

(1:07:26–1:08:06) Price of Freedom – Immediate Auditing Rule
LRH quote emphasized:

Constant alertness and immediate handling of any mental mass or restimulation
Rule: As soon as a condition worsens, audit it at once to maintain freedom.

(1:08:11–1:09:05) Omni vs. Standard Tech Comparison
Omni framed as:

Fast, accessible, and low-cost

Hard to create bypass charge because charge is addressed immediately
Standard tech described as longer, more expensive, and structured

(1:09:25–1:10:32) Course Results and Meter Wins
Graduates report:

Two weeks of Omni processing equaling months of standard auditing
Light needle and stable TA
Omni becoming a daily-life tool for handling situations in real time

(1:11:04–1:12:00) “Static Auditing” and Leverage Principle
Omni is described as:

Using “10 to the 40th degree auditors” (Source-level pan-determination)

A physics leverage analogy—more “auditors” = greater force = faster clearing

(1:12:10–1:12:49) Outreach and Future Webinars
Announcements:
Course start date and individual consult availability
Telegram and Facebook groups for community support
Free bi-weekly webinars planned for those unable to enroll

(1:13:37–1:14:07) Exteriorization and Training
Dianetics and Scientology framed as:
Exteriorization of the being to handle large quantities of aberration
A matter of education and gradient training, not mystical attainment

(1:14:15–1:15:05) Physics Analogy and Closing Cognitions
Participant reflections:

Mental masses likened to “knots in space” undone through Omni processing

Omni described as a future direction of Scientology
Session closes with gratitude, donation info, and webinar sign-off.

Framework Summary

This lecture positions OMNI processing as a direct Eighth Dynamic application, where the thetan extends beyond MEST and personal identity to Source Static and all players, using Tone 40 conceptual postulates to ethically as-is mental mass, charge, and aberration. It integrates Scientology Axioms, Pan-Determination, and Captain Bill’s OMNI doctrine into a practical self-clearing model.

Rapid ARC break handling

Layered discharge of Second Dynamic disappointments

Ethical boundaries in case work on others

Advanced application of Axiom 20 (Perfect Duplication) to erase fixed mental mass

The lecture reinforces Omni-state as the natural condition of the thetan, where Tone 40 conceptual intention and Source Static dissolve reactive mind content through as-isness and perfect duplication.

Introduces Omni-Havingness to restore body havingness after heavy discharge, and presents a solo C/S model for continuous self-clearing. The lecture frames Omni as static-level leverage—multiplying causation to rapidly dissolve layered mental mass while maintaining ethical and practical accessibility for any bridge level.

Show less